13/07/2022 15:26, David Marchand:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 3:36 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >
> > There is a layer violation in the vDPA API for getting the device name.
> > Instead of providing the name at vDPA level,
> > a function returns the low-level device object.
>
> Exposing a rte_device
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 3:36 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> There is a layer violation in the vDPA API for getting the device name.
> Instead of providing the name at vDPA level,
> a function returns the low-level device object.
Exposing a rte_device (as an opaque pointer) in upper device classes
From: Thomas Monjalon
> There is a layer violation in the vDPA API for getting the device name.
> Instead of providing the name at vDPA level, a function returns the low-level
> device object.
> The plan is to introduce a new function in 22.11, promote in 23.07, and remove
> rte_vdpa_get_rte_de
On 7/12/22 15:36, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
There is a layer violation in the vDPA API for getting the device name.
Instead of providing the name at vDPA level,
a function returns the low-level device object.
The plan is to introduce a new function in 22.11, promote in 23.07,
and remove rte_vdpa_
4 matches
Mail list logo