On Oct 30, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Discussion thread for the maven-plugins-1.0 release...
-Donald
Will the scm info in these two poms be updated when you create the tag?
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/maven-plugins/
branches/1.0/maven-emf-plugin/pom.xml
ht
Paul,
Awesome plan!
I've been tracking the improvements that have been going on with dojo
since I started work on the monitoring project, and would be very
excited to get 1.0 in for later use.
-Erik
Paul McMahan (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3300?page=com
As we get close to releasing Geronimo 2.1 and look beyond, I'd like to
discuss a few usability improvements we can do to G. I am
cross-posting this to the user-list so that we can get a direct
feedback from our dear users.
1. Dynamic status messages. Some operations may take a certain amount
of ti
BTW, dojox.charting was missing from 0.9 but 1.0 includes it,
refactored from 0.4 and now using the powerful dojox.gfx library.
Best wishes,
Paul
On Nov 2, 2007, at 11:21 AM, Erik B. Craig wrote:
Paul,
Awesome plan!
I've been tracking the improvements that have been going on with
dojo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12539609
]
Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-3300:
Let's hold off on this until Dojo 1.0 is released.
http://dojotoo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12539592
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-3582:
---
At revision: 591344
o LoginModule should not add
imo Revision: 591319 built with tests included
>
> See the full build-0900.log file at
> http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071102/build-0900.log
>
> Download the binaries from
> http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071102
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Viet Hung Nguyen resolved GERONIMO-3561.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1
The discussion about authenticating
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik B. Craig updated GERONIMO-3577:
Attachment: GERONIMO-3577.patch
Patch adds simple case ability to add new graphs to dbas
+1
Jay
Donald Woods wrote:
The maven-plugins are build tools used by the Eclipse Plugin and J2G
tools and are not included in either tool.
A 72 hour vote is being called for the following:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/maven-plugins/branches/1.0
Revision 590072
Bin
server/trunk/modules deleted via Revision 591372
server/trunk/configs deleted via Revision 591373.
This completes Geronimo-3565.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/31/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The restructured trunk has built successfully 3 times now. It has
> passed our testsuite and TC
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gert Vanthienen resolved SM-1124.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.2)
3.2.1
Added warning wh
+1
On Oct 30, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
The maven-plugins are build tools used by the Eclipse Plugin and
J2G tools and are not included in either tool.
A 72 hour vote is being called for the following:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/maven-plugins/
branches/1
+1. I ran RAT and inspected the binaries. All looked good. Thanks Donald!
--kevan
On 10/30/07, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The maven-plugins are build tools used by the Eclipse Plugin and J2G
> tools and are not included in either tool.
>
> A 72 hour vote is being called for the fo
Why not use the plugins portlet in the admin console? From the admin
console in tomcat6-jee5 I was able to stop the axis components and
then install the cxf and cxf-deployer plugins from the online
Geronimo plugin repository all within about a minute.
Best wishes,
Paul
On Nov 2, 2007, at
On 11/2/07, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Prasad Kashyap wrote:
> > As we get close to releasing Geronimo 2.1 and look beyond, I'd like to
> > discuss a few usability improvements we can do to G. I am
> > cross-posting this to the user-list so that we can get a direct
> > feedback from
+1 - 5 votes (4 by PMC members)
0 - none
-1 - none
Vote passes.
I'll start the remaining release steps. Thanks everyone.
-Donald
Donald Woods wrote:
The maven-plugins are build tools used by the Eclipse Plugin and J2G
tools and are not included in either tool.
A 72 hour v
On Nov 2, 2007, at 1:32 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Nov 2, 2007, at 10:14 AM, Paul McMahan wrote:
Why not use the plugins portlet in the admin console? From the
admin console in tomcat6-jee5 I was able to stop the axis
components and then install the cxf and cxf-deployer plugins from
the
On Nov 2, 2007, at 10:14 AM, Paul McMahan wrote:
Why not use the plugins portlet in the admin console? From the
admin console in tomcat6-jee5 I was able to stop the axis
components and then install the cxf and cxf-deployer plugins from
the online Geronimo plugin repository all within abou
On Nov 2, 2007, at 1:13 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Can you be more specific here? What operations and how does a
message
make things any more dynamic? Is this a web console only concern
or is
it also a command line concern?
Yes. Let me give you an example. Recently I was deploying a
confi
I made the plugin system support the condition expressions we've been
using to select a web service container but I can't see how to make
it work usefully so I wonder if we need a new approach.
Previously the conditions for axis2 and cxf we different in the jetty
and tomcat servers, so cxf
I'm pretty sure this is something no one has tried before.
The basic problem IMNSHO is explained clearly CommandSupport line 60:
protected CommandContext commandContext = null; //todo: this is
pretty bad; should add it into constructor
this should be private final.
I guess we need a jir
Just curious - Any news on this?
Jay
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I sent him a private ping as well just as a heads up.
On Oct 27, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Oct 27, 2007, at 5:13 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Oct 26, 2007, at 11:57 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I think that Geir h
Any ServiceMix Dev owners.. pl. reply.. I need to enhance the service mix
with this new mbean, however I am unable to find maven/ant way to compile
and deploy this along with server.
Regards,
Nagendra
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-write-and-deploy-a-service-which
Yes, I'll update those 2 sub poms when the tag is cut and published.
Thanks for catching it.
-Donald
Paul McMahan wrote:
On Oct 30, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Discussion thread for the maven-plugins-1.0 release...
-Donald
Will the scm info in these two poms be updated when yo
All,
I am wondering if anyone else has been using the deployer script to
deploy on a remote machine at all recently, and if so if you have
noticed any problems with it.
I am getting a NullPointerException on an attempt to deploy a plugin
from one machine to another with
./deploy.sh -u -p -
Review CertificateChainLoginModule
--
Key: GERONIMO-3582
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3582
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Comp
On Nov 2, 2007, at 10:27 AM, Paul McMahan wrote:
On Nov 2, 2007, at 1:13 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Can you be more specific here? What operations and how does a
message
make things any more dynamic? Is this a web console only concern
or is
it also a command line concern?
Yes. Let me g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Kashyap closed GERONIMO-3565.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Prasad Kashyap
http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jt
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
As we get close to releasing Geronimo 2.1 and look beyond, I'd like to
discuss a few usability improvements we can do to G. I am
cross-posting this to the user-list so that we can get a direct
feedback from our dear users.
1. Dynamic status messages. Some operations may t
On Nov 2, 2007, at 1:35 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Yes. Let me give you an example. Recently I was deploying a
configuration. For a while the wheels turned and then I received an
operation successful message. However, the deployment had spewn a
boatload of stack traces to the geronimo.log file.
In
I also like 2, 3, and 4. But with a twist, setting up server
configuration 'templates' and allowing users to do the same. Then
allowing the user/administrator to change which template their server
should morph to.
We would supply templates for all of our default builds (essentially a
copy o
Deployer.jar gets null pointer exception and hangs on attempt to install-plugin
on remote host
--
Key: GERONIMO-3583
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-35
no, I'll try again.
On Nov 2, 2007, at 1:46 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
Just curious - Any news on this?
Jay
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I sent him a private ping as well just as a heads up.
On Oct 27, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Oct 27, 2007, at 5:13 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12539684
]
Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-3573:
---
Viet,
A few comments:
1) SnapshotProcessor does not need to exten
OpenEJB trunk at 591319
Geronimo Revision: 591425 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071102/build-1500.log
Download the binaries from
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071102
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Yay :-)
--jason
On Nov 2, 2007, at 8:54 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
server/trunk/modules deleted via Revision 591372
server/trunk/configs deleted via Revision 591373.
This completes Geronimo-3565.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/31/07, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The restructured trunk h
Mmkay :-)
--jason
On Nov 1, 2007, at 7:44 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Move it ;-)
Kevan Miller wrote:
No, not in my opinion. I haven't heard of any dissenters. There's
been
plenty of time for someone to raise an objection. I say -- have at
it...
--kevan
On 11/1/07, *Jason Dillon* <[E
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12539689
]
Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-3523:
The two slashes '//' in the URL were a red herring. The problem
prasad/binaries/trunk/20071102/build-1500.log
>
> Download the binaries from
> http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071102
> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
> [INFO]
>
> [INFO] Total time: 29 minutes 5
The J2G 1.0.0 RC1 build is ready for a vote, now that the
maven-plugins-1.0 dependencies have been released (should appear on the
mirror repos in the next 24 hours.)
A 72 hour vote is being called for the following:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/j2g/branches/1.0.0
Revision
Starting discussion thread for Vote thread at -
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-J2G-1.0.0-RC1-tf4740253s134.html
-Donald
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Folks,
We added a bunch of tests in the last few days but we still need some
help identifying and reviewing the components. Please see the wiki
page ( http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Security+Review)
for latest updates.
Thanks,
Jarek
On 10/29/07, Jarek Gawor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Warner updated GSHELL-36:
---
Attachment: GShell-36AnnotationChange.patch
I gave it another shot with the annotation change. I like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12539734
]
Jason Dillon commented on GSHELL-36:
Cool, will take a look this evening. Thanks :-)
> The clp does not allow --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12539779
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3527:
--
GERONIMO-3577 patch applied in rev 591545.
> Monitor
David,
Thanks for the explanation. Could we add a line
PortOffset=0
in the Config-substitutions.properties file (please note that no #).
The rest can be added to a separate file (readme.txt?).
Thanks
Anita
--- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 31, 2007, at 7:49 PM, Anita
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12539786
]
Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-3523:
---
Found this: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JETTY-336. We might be
48 matches
Mail list logo