On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 2:01 PM, André Malo wrote:
> * Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> > It seems that RedirectMatch isn't documented without the third (URL)
> > argument, unless in .
>
> Huh? Actually it is (or maybe I'm not getting something here). I checked at
> least back until 2.0.
>
> http://httpd.a
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:44 PM, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
> You ALWAYS preserve unset state. How else do you perform the THIRD merge?
>
To be more specific, httpd is allowed to merge whatever merges it likes.
If it wants
to optimize for the directory and then merge the base server to the merged
You ALWAYS preserve unset state. How else do you perform the THIRD merge?
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> This won't work for eg, this second level inheritance: server context
> is on, vhost and inner Location are unset.
> Location->inherit_before will be unset whereas i
This won't work for eg, this second level inheritance: server context
is on, vhost and inner Location are unset.
Location->inherit_before will be unset whereas it should be on.
We should not preserve the unset state IMHO.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 3:27 AM, wrote:
> Author: wrowe
> Date: Tue Jun 30
For 2.2/2.4 the delta is a one line change to trunk's behavior;
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 8:27 PM, wrote:
> Author: wrowe
> Date: Tue Jun 30 01:27:42 2015
> New Revision: 1688339
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1688339
> Log:
> Very difficult to read, and therefore was wrong.
>
> Assert that the S
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 8:06 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> Maybe defining (naming) inherit_before tristate values would help:
>
Not really...
+a->inherit_before = (over->inherit_before == INHERIT_ON
> + || (over->inherit_before == INHERIT_UNSET
> +
Maybe defining (naming) inherit_before tristate values would help:
Index: modules/filters/mod_substitute.c
===
--- modules/filters/mod_substitute.c(revision 1688331)
+++ modules/filters/mod_substitute.c(working copy)
@@ -68,6
I was literally switching between a dead and live box repairing a corrupted
boot volume, so you may be right or I might have studied a stale patch.
Will refresh trunk in a few minutes here with suggested changes.
On Jun 29, 2015 7:42 PM, "Yann Ylavic" wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 2:03 AM, Wi
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 2:03 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> I can't approve this semantic mess.
>
> EITHER it is inherit_before on trunk-2.4-2.2 with a change of default
> behavior, or it is inherit_after, again across all branches with a change of
> default behavior. The delta should consist of
I can't approve this semantic mess.
EITHER it is inherit_before on trunk-2.4-2.2 with a change of default
behavior, or it is inherit_after, again across all branches with a change
of default behavior. The delta should consist of a one line difference,
evaluating inheritance behavior within the me
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Michael Kaufmann
> wrote:
>> LimitRequestBody is broken in the (unreleased) Apache versions 2.4.13-2.4.15
>> because of this change: http://svn.apache.org/r1684515
>>
>> In http_filters.c, ap_http_filter(): The
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Michael Kaufmann
wrote:
> LimitRequestBody is broken in the (unreleased) Apache versions 2.4.13-2.4.15
> because of this change: http://svn.apache.org/r1684515
>
> In http_filters.c, ap_http_filter(): The variable "totalread" is
> uninitialized if readbytes is 0.
>
Hi,
LimitRequestBody is broken in the (unreleased) Apache versions
2.4.13-2.4.15 because of this change: http://svn.apache.org/r1684515
In http_filters.c, ap_http_filter(): The variable "totalread" is
uninitialized if readbytes is 0.
Messages similar to this one are logged: "AH01591: Read
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 01:47:45PM +0200, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 05:11:57PM +0200, Kaspar Brand wrote:
> > On 22.06.2015 10:37, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> > > Please find a new patch attached which I hope covers all the
> > > parts you've outlined, for SSL_CLIENT_SAN_OTHER_msUPN
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 05:11:57PM +0200, Kaspar Brand wrote:
> On 22.06.2015 10:37, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> > Please find a new patch attached which I hope covers all the
> > parts you've outlined, for SSL_CLIENT_SAN_OTHER_msUPN_*.
>
> Thanks. Your implementation assumes that only a single otherNa
15 matches
Mail list logo
