On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:10:08 -0500
William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> In general, the thread safety does work, but is not as efficient as it
> could be.
Last I looked, PHP throws in quite a kitchen-sink, including
components like old libraries (like libgif, libjpeg) written
back in the 1980s for comman
On Oct 27, 2015 05:38, "Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz" wrote:
>
> On Monday 26 of October 2015, Yehezkel Horowitz wrote:
> > First, thanks Nick for the feedback.
> >
> > I have submitted https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58550 as
> > you suggested.
> >
> > >If a threaded MPM really isn't an op
On Monday 26 of October 2015, Yehezkel Horowitz wrote:
> First, thanks Nick for the feedback.
>
> I have submitted https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58550 as
> you suggested.
>
> >If a threaded MPM really isn't an option (for most users the obvious
> >solution), then the question is
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Yehezkel Horowitz
wrote:
>
>>The following patch was recently backported to v2.4, how similar is your
>> patch to this one?
>
>> *) MPMs: Support SO_REUSEPORT to create multiple duplicated listener
>
> records for scalability. [Yingqi Lu ,
>
> Jeff Trawi
>Just to clarify, all updates to httpd need to be made to trunk first, which
>then allow it to be backported to v2.4, and then v2.2.
>The reason for this is we don’t want features added to v2.2 that then
>subsequently vanish when v2.4 comes out (and so on).
Understood. I just want to get some fe
First, thanks Nick for the feedback.
I have submitted https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58550 as you
suggested.
>If a threaded MPM really isn't an option (for most users the obvious
>solution), then the question is what works for you.
I can't use threaded MPM as PHP (at least my v
On 26 Oct 2015, at 10:45 AM, Yehezkel Horowitz wrote:
> Any chance someone could take a short look and provide me a feedback (of any
> kind)?
>
> I know your focus is on 2.4 and trunk, but there are still many 2.2 servers
> out there…
>
> Patch attached again for you convenience.…
Just to
On Mon, 2015-10-26 at 08:45 +, Yehezkel Horowitz wrote:
> Any chance someone could take a short look and provide me a feedback
> (of any kind)?
A patch posted here may get lost, especially if it's
not simple and obvious enough for instant review and
understanding. Posting it as an Enhancement
Horowitz
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 6:14 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Improve Apache performance on high load (prefork MPM) with multiple
Accept mutexes (Patch attached)
Hello Apache gurus.
I was working on a project which used Apache 2.2.x with prefork MPM (using
flock as mutex method
Hello Apache gurus.
I was working on a project which used Apache 2.2.x with prefork MPM (using
flock as mutex method) on Linux machine (with 20 cores), and run into the
following problem.
During load, when number of Apache child processes get beyond some point (~3000
processes) - Apache didn't
10 matches
Mail list logo
