[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2455:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2455_3x.patch
Patch applies Mike's comments. I think this is ready to go in. I'd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12871023#action_12871023
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2455:
bq. CFW's comment should be "make it 1 lower"
Ri
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Noble Paul updated SOLR-1870:
-
Attachment: SOLR-1870.patch
fixing JavabinCodec to write collection as array
> Binary Update Request (jav
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12871001#action_12871001
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-1870:
--
bq. "top level" there will be an Iterator of docs, so i
I am looking into collectDelta method in DocBuilder.java and I noticed that
to determine the deltaRemoveSet it currently loops through the whole
deltaSet for each deleted row. (Version 1.4.0 line 641)
Does anyone else agree with the fact that this is quite inefficient?
For delta-imports with a l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1923?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated SOLR-1923:
--
Attachment: SOLR-1923.patch
> add caverphone to phoneticfilter
>
>
>
add caverphone to phoneticfilter
Key: SOLR-1923
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1923
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Schema and Analysis
Affects Versions: 3.1
Hi,
I'm using the latest nightly build of solr (apache-solr-2010-05-24_08-05-13)
and am repeatedly experiencing a NullPointerException after calling delete,
commit, optimize. Stack trace below. The index is ~20Gb.
I'm not doing Lucene/Solr core development - I just figured this was a better
pl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2380:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2380.patch
New iteration attached.
I got Solr mostly cutover, at
The reason for this is simple. LCF keeps track of which documents it has
handed off to Solr, and has a fairly involved mechanism for making sure that
every document LCF *thinks* got there, actually does. It even uses a mechanism
akin to a 2-phase commit to make sure that its internal records a
This is an unresolved old topic.
http://www.mail-archive.com/lucene-net-u...@incubator.apache.org/msg00872.html
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Andrzej Bialecki [mailto:a...@getopt.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 12:32 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: .Net, Lucene and IKVM
Hi all,
Hi all,
I'm glad to report that I was able to compile Lucene branch_3x with a
recent snapshot of IKVM, and after trying out the Lucene demo apps both
the IndexFiles and SearchFiles applications appear to run flawlessly.
Environment is WinXP/SP2, .Net CLR 2.0, 3.0, 3.5, and IKVM downloaded
from htt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870846#action_12870846
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2413:
-
By the way, one idea could be to make benchmark
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> I'm happy to announce that the PMC has accepted Andrzej Bialecki as
> Lucene/Solr committer!
>
> Welcome aboard Andrzej,
An enthusiastic jet lagged +1 ;-)
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870843#action_12870843
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2413:
-
{quote}
contrib/benchmark's NewShingleAnalyzerT
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870842#action_12870842
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-2413:
-
contrib/benchmark's NewShingleAnalyzerTask depe
Indexing a doc won't be as fast as raw disk IO. But you won't be doing
just raw disk IO to guarantee acceptance. And that will have a cost and
complexity that really makes me wonder if its worth the speed advantage.
For very large documents with complex analyzers...perhaps. But its not
going to
Hi Karl,
what are you describing seems to be a good usecase for something like
a message queue where you push a document or record to a queue which
guarantees the queues persistence. I look at this from a little
different perspective, in a distributed environment you would have to
guarantee delive
Hi Mark,
Unfortunately, indexing performance *is* of concern, otherwise I'd already be
committing on every post.
If your guess is correct, you are basically saying that adding a document to an
index in Solr/Lucene is just as fast as writing that file directly to the disk.
Because, obviously,
On 5/24/10 3:10 PM, karl.wri...@nokia.com wrote:
Hi all,
It seems to me that the “commit” logic in the Solr updateRequestHandler
(or wherever the logic is actually located) conflates two different
semantics. One semantic is what you need to do to make the index process
perform well. The other sem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2458:
Attachment: LUCENE-2458.patch
updated patch that cuts over the remaining two qps: the flexible que
Hi Bill,
Would you know what the equivalent mingw gcc flag for MSVC's /implib:foo.lib
flag is ?
This overrides the default name and location that the linker uses to produce
a DLLs' import library.
I added some linking tricks on Windows and Linux for supporting the new
--import funtionality
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870761#action_12870761
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2455:
I will document it in CHANGES under API section.
Oops :z = 3x
Shai
On Monday, May 24, 2010, Shai Erera wrote:
> So do we want to just remove the 1x indexes from :z and 2x from trunk?
> Or do we also want to remove the live migration code? How can one
> start with that for example? Are there constants to look for for
> example?
>
> Shai
>
> On
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870743#action_12870743
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2455:
bq. With that behind us, did some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870735#action_12870735
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2455:
Ahh, I knew we must be talking past each other :)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870724#action_12870724
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2455:
Sorry -- for each major release,
So do we want to just remove the 1x indexes from :z and 2x from trunk?
Or do we also want to remove the live migration code? How can one
start with that for example? Are there constants to look for for
example?
Shai
On Monday, May 24, 2010, Mark Miller wrote:
> On 5/24/10 11:25 AM, Michael McCan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870688#action_12870688
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2455:
I'm not sure about the live migration, Mike. Firs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870633#action_12870633
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1622:
-
{quote}
We'd then need an AutomatonWordQuery -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870631#action_12870631
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-1852:
---
Also, Mark mentioned to me he had concerns about 'ind
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870628#action_12870628
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-1852:
---
bq. now this has been in trunk longer, do you feel an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870629#action_12870629
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1622:
---
In my opinion, we should also have a very s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870624#action_12870624
]
Peter Wolanin commented on SOLR-1852:
-
now this has been in trunk longer, do you feel an
Welcome Andrzej!
simon
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Welcome Andrzej! I am glad to have you finally on the Team :-)
>
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870619#action_12870619
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1622:
bq. For other reasons, including
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi updated LUCENE-2286:
---
Fix Version/s: 3.1
according to CHANGES.txt, this fix is in branch_3x as well.
> enable Def
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870605#action_12870605
]
Yuval Feinstein commented on LUCENE-2091:
-
@Vinay - I have this suggestion. I am u
We us an autocommit with Solr and I've had this worry too - apparently
if you get a hard crash Solr will roll back the not-yet-committed
docs.
I don't think it's happened more than once in a year, but still possible.
-Peter
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 9:10 AM, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It seems to me t
Hi all,
It seems to me that the "commit" logic in the Solr updateRequestHandler (or
wherever the logic is actually located) conflates two different semantics. One
semantic is what you need to do to make the index process perform well. The
other semantic is guaranteed atomicity of document rec
I talked to some people that need another sorting-option as well.
At the moment, it is not possible to sort custom out-of-the-box.
I don't need such a feature right now, but it would be a nice-to-have.
If there is some more interest on the mailing list, I will register at the
JIRA and open an is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870593#action_12870593
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1622:
-
bq. There are tricky tradeoffs of index time vs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870588#action_12870588
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1622:
Here's the dev thread that lead t
On 5/24/10 11:25 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
Yes, I think we can remove support for 1.9 indexes as of 3.0:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BackwardsCompatibility
So starting with 3.0 the oldest index we must support are those written by 2.0.
Mike
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Sh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2471:
---
Fix Version/s: 3.1
4.0
> Supporting bulk copies in Directory
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870560#action_12870560
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2471:
I think this issue makes sense, s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870559#action_12870559
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2474:
Should we rename this to "CloseEv
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870551#action_12870551
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2272:
Thanks Peter -- this looks import
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870549#action_12870549
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2455:
bq. Backwards support should be m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870548#action_12870548
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2455:
Patch looks great! So awesome se
Welcome Andrzej! I am glad to have you finally on the Team :-)
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 11:34 AM
I'm happy to announce that the PMC has accepted Andrzej Bialecki as
Lucene/Solr committer!
Welcome aboard Andrzej,
Mike
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene
But as of 3.0.0 it still supports those indexes :-) So wanna remove in 3.1?
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 20
Yes, I think we can remove support for 1.9 indexes as of 3.0:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BackwardsCompatibility
So starting with 3.0 the oldest index we must support are those written by 2.0.
Mike
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm working on adding su
54 matches
Mail list logo
