> ant clean clean-jars jar-checksums precommit
I'll check, thanks Kevin.
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 3:53 AM Kevin Risden wrote:
>
> I get changed files on master after running the commands before precommit:
>
> ➜ lucene-solr git:(master) ✗ git status
> On branch master
> Your branch is up to date
I get changed files on master after running the commands before precommit:
➜ lucene-solr git:(master) ✗ git status
On branch master
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/master'.
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add/rm ..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git restore ..." to
Ishan do you get an error with the following?
ant clean clean-jars jar-checksums precommit
This should regenerate any of the checksums. I haven't checked locally but
might help.
Kevin Risden
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 4:48 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No clue why
Welcome Houston!
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 9:58 AM Anshum Gupta wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please join me in welcoming Houston Putman as the latest Lucene/Solr
> committer!
>
> Houston has been involved with the community since 2013, when he first
> contributed the Analytics contrib module. Since the
No clue why licenses are being checked for those jars. Those are test
jars. I never got a precommit failure.
ALso, it seems licenses are not actually tested, but somehow those
sha1 files are generated but not cleaned up. Sigh! I think I have no
clue where to even start looking to solve this issue.
Welcome Houston!
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 3:20 PM Yonik Seeley wrote:
> Congrats Houston!
> -Yonik
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 3:58 AM Anshum Gupta
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please join me in welcoming Houston Putman as the latest Lucene/Solr
>> committer!
>>
>> Houston has been involved wit
Congrats Houston!
-Yonik
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 3:58 AM Anshum Gupta wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please join me in welcoming Houston Putman as the latest Lucene/Solr
> committer!
>
> Houston has been involved with the community since 2013, when he first
> contributed the Analytics contrib module. Sinc
Thanks everyone!
As requested, a brief history of me:
A native Austinite, I went to The University of Texas at Austin. Back in
2013 I lucked into an internship with Bloomberg working on a new Search
Infrastructure team. There I had my first exposure to Solr and built the
first iteration of the An
Congratulations and welcome Houston!
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 9:32 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe
wrote:
> Welcome Houston!
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 9:09 AM Kevin Risden wrote:
>
>> Congrats and welcome!
>>
>> Kevin Risden
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019, 12:05 Jason Gerlowski
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Congratu
Want to raise a JIRA (task?) and put it in the umbrella task? (SOLR-13914)? I’m
trying to keep all these kinds of TODO’s in a place we won’t forget them.
Up to you…
> On Nov 14, 2019, at 11:56 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
>> I didn't realize you could specify a folder name with -p ! I think
>> th
I'll take a look. It was because of SOLR-13662, which passed many,
many tests locally.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 10:41 PM Policeman Jenkins Server
wrote:
>
> Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/25021/
> Java: 64bit/jdk-13 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC
>
> 1 tes
Welcome Houston!
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 9:09 AM Kevin Risden wrote:
> Congrats and welcome!
>
> Kevin Risden
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019, 12:05 Jason Gerlowski wrote:
>
>> Congratulations!
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:58 AM Gus Heck wrote:
>> >
>> > Congratulations and welcome :)
>> >
>> > O
Congrats and welcome!
Kevin Risden
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019, 12:05 Jason Gerlowski wrote:
> Congratulations!
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:58 AM Gus Heck wrote:
> >
> > Congratulations and welcome :)
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:52 AM Namgyu Kim wrote:
> >>
> >> Congratulations and welcome
Congratulations!
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:58 AM Gus Heck wrote:
>
> Congratulations and welcome :)
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:52 AM Namgyu Kim wrote:
>>
>> Congratulations and welcome, Houston! :D
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 1:18 AM Ken LaPorte wrote:
>>>
>>> Congratulations Houston! We
Congratulations and welcome :)
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:52 AM Namgyu Kim wrote:
> Congratulations and welcome, Houston! :D
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 1:18 AM Ken LaPorte wrote:
>
>> Congratulations Houston! Well deserved honor.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from:
>> https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.
> I didn't realize you could specify a folder name with -p ! I think
> that covers the use case I was describing. If the module names we have
> are helpful in an IDE, that's reason enough to keep them
> fully-qualified.
I would opt to change them to reflect folder structure precisely (it's
simpler
Congratulations and welcome, Houston! :D
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 1:18 AM Ken LaPorte wrote:
> Congratulations Houston! Well deserved honor.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Lucene-Java-Developer-f564358.html
>
> ---
I didn't realize you could specify a folder name with -p ! I think
that covers the use case I was describing. If the module names we have
are helpful in an IDE, that's reason enough to keep them
fully-qualified.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:13 AM Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
> Perhaps. I don't use this wra
Congratulations Houston! Well deserved honor.
--
Sent from:
https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Lucene-Java-Developer-f564358.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: d
Perhaps. I don't use this wrapper. Knowing the difference and
understanding what you're expressing with both variants is all it
takes, really.
D.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 5:08 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
> Isn’t this why Mark recommended using gdub (gw) so you can run from within
> sub folders?
>
>
Isn’t this why Mark recommended using gdub (gw) so you can run from within sub
folders?
Jan Høydahl
> 14. nov. 2019 kl. 14:22 skrev Dawid Weiss :
>
> Your understanding is incorrect, Michael.
>
> This:
>
>> ./gradlew lucene:lucene-analyzers:lucene-analyzers-nori:test seems to work
>
> runs
Congrats and welcome Houston!
Regards,
Munendra S N
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 6:51 PM Karl Wright wrote:
> Welcome!
> Karl
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 8:17 AM Michael Sokolov
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Houston, welcome!
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 7:23 AM Erick Erickson
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Welcome!
>
Your understanding is incorrect, Michael.
This:
> ./gradlew lucene:lucene-analyzers:lucene-analyzers-nori:test seems to work
runs task 'test' inside module lucene:lucene-analyzers:lucene-analyzers-nori
while this:
> ./gradlew lucene:lucene-analyzers:test
tries to run task 'test' in module luc
Welcome!
Karl
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 8:17 AM Michael Sokolov wrote:
> Hi Houston, welcome!
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 7:23 AM Erick Erickson
> wrote:
> >
> > Welcome!
> >
> > > On Nov 14, 2019, at 5:19 AM, Jan Høydahl
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Congrats and welcome Houston!
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ja
Hi Houston, welcome!
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 7:23 AM Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> Welcome!
>
> > On Nov 14, 2019, at 5:19 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote:
> >
> > Congrats and welcome Houston!
> >
> > --
> > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> >
> >> 14. nov. 2019 kl
OK with some grepping I I found these module names in various places
(looks like they were defined as maven module names, where I guess
maybe it is best practice for every submodule's name to contain the
complete hierarchy of all its ancestor modules??)
./gradlew lucene:lucene-analyzers:lucene-ana
I'm trying to run the tests in the lucene/analysis module (really I'd
like to run tests in lucene/analysis/kuromoji), but I'm having trouble
figuring out the naming convention and/or the project structure. It
doesn't seem to be the same as the directory structure? EG I am able
to run tests in core
Welcome!
> On Nov 14, 2019, at 5:19 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
> Congrats and welcome Houston!
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
>
>> 14. nov. 2019 kl. 09:57 skrev Anshum Gupta :
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please join me in welcoming Houston Putman as
Congrats and welcome Houston!!
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 at 11:54, David Smiley wrote:
> Congrats Houston! Woohoo!
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 3:58 AM Anshum Gupta
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please join me in welcoming Houston Putman as the latest Lucene/Solr
>> committer!
>>
>> Houston has been in
Congrats Houston! Woohoo!
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 3:58 AM Anshum Gupta wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please join me in welcoming Houston Putman as the latest Lucene/Solr
> committer!
>
> Houston has been involved with the community since 2013, when he first
> contributed the Analytics contrib module. Si
Hi all,
In https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8987 we move the website from
CMS (svn/forrest) to a git repo, auto built by Pelican by pushing to master
branch.
We just got the first staging build working and pushed to
https://lucene.staged.apache.org/
Please take a look and report ba
Congrats and welcome Houston!
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> 14. nov. 2019 kl. 09:57 skrev Anshum Gupta :
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please join me in welcoming Houston Putman as the latest Lucene/Solr
> committer!
>
> Houston has been involved with the comm
> org.asciidoctor:asciidoctorj=1.6.0-alpha.5
>
> with
>
> org.asciidoctor:asciidoctor-ant=1.6.2
> org.asciidoctor:asciidoctorj=1.6.2
You don't need to add asciidoctor-ant - it isn't used anywhere as an
explicit dependency.
> If I remove one or both, and try “gw jarChecksums” Bad Things Happen.
I
Hi all,
Please join me in welcoming Houston Putman as the latest Lucene/Solr
committer!
Houston has been involved with the community since 2013, when he first
contributed the Analytics contrib module. Since then he has been involved
with the community, participated in conferences and spoken about
I agree with the removal of LTS designation - there’s no formal commitment from
the community to support this or that release for that long.
Even though in practice bug fixes are often backported to older branches that
are still widely used, there’s no actual contract to do so, and implying ther
Sorry, I am just looking at this now and about to call it a night soon.
I'll try and get to it tomorrow/todayi.e Friday but if you get to it before
I do, please move forward.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 4:26 PM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Anshum et. al. :
>
> It’s been a busy day, never got back to it.
36 matches
Mail list logo