GitHub user spyhunter99 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/129
MPDF-81 merging in the needed doxia modules required for copyright ovâ¦
â¦errides, Add property based overrides for the copyright headers. Most of
the real changes were in FoAggregatedS
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/163
@shafiullas
Please rebase your branch.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/163
@shafiullas
Register in Jira and open issue in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE. The message of the commit and
GitHub issue should be renamed to something like:
[SUREFI
Github user Tibor17 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/163#discussion_r137895395
--- Diff:
maven-surefire-report-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/surefire/report/AbstractSurefireReportMojo.java
---
@@ -34,13 +27,21 @
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/143
@surli
You have not answered my questions yet. Let's do it now about making
releases. Register in Jira and open issue in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE. The message of th
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/141
@britter
I think this was forgotten. Should I process it?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/159
@andrew-j-cohen
We do not have rights to close this issue. Please close it!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/114
@Fuud
This branch was rebased and pushed to master. Please close it.
Thx for contributing.
---
-
To unsubscribe,
On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 22:31:55 +0200, Tibor Digana
wrote:
Releasing 3.0 is not possible within one month.
It can be only 3.0-M1. It's not about new API only however old 3.0 branch
exists, we plan to introduce Extensions, break backwards compatibility
with
Maven/System Properties and introduc
Releasing 3.0 is not possible within one month.
It can be only 3.0-M1. It's not about new API only however old 3.0 branch
exists, we plan to introduce Extensions, break backwards compatibility with
Maven/System Properties and introduce JUnit5.
I think we can think of version 2.0 for Jigsaw.
Robert
Hi,
based on my earlier request in INFRA ticket[1] a new schema is already
there cause there were things not the best for example having an entry
"Question" which often lead people to use JIRA as a user forum..which is
now no possible anymore...
From my point of view this schema only needs t
AFAIK the scheme still has to be created and verified, this is just
another part of that.
I don't think it's worth voting for every (little) change, especially not
now there's no final scheme yet.
Robert
On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 17:46:13 +0200, Tibor Digana
wrote:
Does it mean that we have
Does it mean that we have to post new Vote on separate Maven Scheme?
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Robert Scholte
wrote:
> This is part of the scheme in Jira.
> Since there's a proposal to make a separate Maven Scheme, this request
> should be added as well.
>
> Robert
>
>
>
> On Fri, 08 Sep
Hi,
from the opensourcedesign we've received a couple of messages from
designers wanting to help us on this topic.
We've decided to create a separate issue for it on the github project of
opensourcedesign[1].
This will make it easier to communicate with each other.
We've chosen for their iss
On top of that I'd like to do a 2.20.1-jpms (or 2.20.1-jigsaw) release.
This has the same fixes as 2.20.1, but adds to support to run modular
projects with the module path.
It can't be part of the same release, because I had to push the Java
version for source/target to 1.7
For surefire I thin
This is part of the scheme in Jira.
Since there's a proposal to make a separate Maven Scheme, this request
should be added as well.
Robert
On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 08:53:31 +0200, Anders Hammar
wrote:
I agree, it's for us as committers to decide.
/Anders
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Mi
16 matches
Mail list logo
