[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #380: METRON-597 Sporadic Failures of Profiler Integr...

2016-12-01 Thread nickwallen
Github user nickwallen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380 Closing this PR. About to open another one with the fix. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #380: METRON-597 Sporadic Failures of Profiler Integr...

2016-12-01 Thread ottobackwards
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380 I think you closed the wrong one --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe

[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #380: METRON-597 Sporadic Failures of Profiler Integr...

2016-12-01 Thread nickwallen
Github user nickwallen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380 I was not happy with #381 . I will reopen it soon once I have a fix that I am happy with. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #380: METRON-597 Sporadic Failures of Profiler Integr...

2016-12-01 Thread JonZeolla
Github user JonZeolla commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380 @nickwallen Sounds reasonable, once #381 gets fleshed out. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #380: METRON-597 Sporadic Failures of Profiler Integr...

2016-12-01 Thread nickwallen
Github user nickwallen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380 I believe that #381 is the real solution to this problem. This PR being simply a work around. I would prefer to push #381 and close this PR. Open to other's opinions though.

[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #380: METRON-597 Sporadic Failures of Profiler Integr...

2016-11-30 Thread dlyle65535
Github user dlyle65535 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380 Probably a dumb question, but doesn't integration-test run Failsafe? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If yo

[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #380: METRON-597 Sporadic Failures of Profiler Integr...

2016-11-30 Thread dlyle65535
Github user dlyle65535 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380 @JonZeolla - oh yeah, totally in agreement there. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not

[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #380: METRON-597 Sporadic Failures of Profiler Integr...

2016-11-30 Thread JonZeolla
Github user JonZeolla commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380 @dlyle65535 while we slightly disagree on semantics, I agree that this should move forward for the short term. I'm primarily indicating that the dev guide needs updated to account for si

[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #380: METRON-597 Sporadic Failures of Profiler Integr...

2016-11-30 Thread dlyle65535
Github user dlyle65535 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380 Alternatively, if you wanted a one-liner, I think you could @Ignore the test class. I didn't see @JonZeolla - add to the [DISCUSS] thread, so I'll answer here- I don't agree tha

[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #380: METRON-597 Sporadic Failures of Profiler Integr...

2016-11-30 Thread ottobackwards
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380 Would it be worth closing/reopening a PASSING PR to see if it too fails? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as wel

[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #380: METRON-597 Sporadic Failures of Profiler Integr...

2016-11-30 Thread JonZeolla
Github user JonZeolla commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380 Doesn't this conflict with the merge requirements on the draft [Coding Guidelines](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=61332235) page? Specifically: * A

[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #380: METRON-597 Sporadic Failures of Profiler Integr...

2016-11-30 Thread cestella
Github user cestella commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380 Agreed, this should be changed in the pom. http://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/inclusion-exclusion.html --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to

[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #380: METRON-597 Sporadic Failures of Profiler Integr...

2016-11-30 Thread ottobackwards
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380 Configuration only change. So, let's say that there is another pr that changes that test, it can do so without worrying about the commented out code etc. not a big deal, really jus

[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #380: METRON-597 Sporadic Failures of Profiler Integr...

2016-11-30 Thread nickwallen
Github user nickwallen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380 Dunno. What are the advantages to doing it that way? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does

[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #380: METRON-597 Sporadic Failures of Profiler Integr...

2016-11-30 Thread ottobackwards
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/380 can this be done in the pom/surefire? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi