On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 16:29 +0100, Aliaksandr Autayeu wrote:
> Jörn, to avoid ambiguity in case you addressed me to propose a WSD
> interface. I'd prefer Anthony to come up with a proposal, because he is
> closer to the multiple WSD algorithms that would be nice to include in the
> analysis.
Sorry
Jörn, to avoid ambiguity in case you addressed me to propose a WSD
interface. I'd prefer Anthony to come up with a proposal, because he is
closer to the multiple WSD algorithms that would be nice to include in the
analysis.
Aliaksandr
On 16 February 2015 at 15:19, Joern Kottmann wrote:
> On Sat
On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 11:09 +0100, Aliaksandr Autayeu wrote:
> Since you're perhaps deeper in this that others you seem to be the
> best
> candidate to make a proposal, to check the state of the art algorithms
> and
> devise general enough interface for all or most of them. One way could
> be
> to
Hi all,
the performance of the parser changed a bit. The output of the current
version in 1.6.0 RC2 is different from the output of the 1.5.3 release.
Even tough there shouldn't been any difference as far as I can see.
The question of what caused that difference came up and I started to
bisect it