+1 binding
Checked:
* Signatures
* Bin distribution:
- NOTICE, README, LICENSE
- Start standalone service and producer/consumer test
* Src distribution:
- NOTICE, README, LICENSE
- Compile and unit tests
- Start standalone service
* Checked staging maven repository ar
+1 (binding)
Follow the "Release Candidate Validation":
- start standalone
- create tenants and namespaces
- publish and consume messages
- cassandra connector
- function and stateful function
Done the performance test, no performance degradation.
Best regards
Penghui
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at
Il Gio 18 Nov 2021, 20:32 Dave Fisher ha scritto:
> I’m making progress here, but I need help getting the pulsarbot GH secret
> into the pulsar-site repository.
>
You have to open a INFRA ticket
Enrico
> If that secret can be shared directly to me then I can fully test before
> adding my PR.
How might the planned move of various components and adaptors out of the main
repository impact the choice to have the docs in the main repository?
> On Nov 17, 2021, at 12:25 PM, Matteo Merli wrote:
>
> I agree with that.
>
> I understand that there are tradeoffs for each approach, though the
PetterIsberg commented on issue #84:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar/issues/84#issuecomment-975717538
@blankensteiner We're grateful that you take time to look into this and I'm
sorry for not helping out on this further.
I'm looking through the code now and can see t
Congratulations! Thanks for all of your hard work to Apache Pulsar and its
community!
Aaron
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 6:37 AM Ran Gao wrote:
> Congrats Jiwei!
>
> Ran
>
> On 2021/11/22 04:35:08 PengHui Li wrote:
> > The Apache Pulsar Project Management Committee (PMC) has invited Jiwei
> Guo
> >
Congratulations!
---
Thanks
Haiting Jiang
On 2021/11/22 04:35:08 PengHui Li wrote:
> The Apache Pulsar Project Management Committee (PMC) has invited Jiwei Guo
> https://github.com/Technoboy- to become a committer and we are pleased to
> announce
> that he has accepted.
>
> Jiwei has joined the c
Hi Enrico,
Thanks for your great work!
We also make some chaos tests for 2.9.0 candidate 4.
We opened a new Pulsar cluster based on 2.9.0-candidate-4 and injected some
chaos experiments by chaos-mesh, such as broker pod failure, kill, and
zookeeper pod failure, in this process, the entire Puls
Congrats Jiwei!
Ran
On 2021/11/22 04:35:08 PengHui Li wrote:
> The Apache Pulsar Project Management Committee (PMC) has invited Jiwei Guo
> https://github.com/Technoboy- to become a committer and we are pleased to
> announce
> that he has accepted.
>
> Jiwei has joined the community for more tha
Congratulations!
Thanks,
Ruguo Yu
On 2021/11/22 04:35:08 PengHui Li wrote:
> The Apache Pulsar Project Management Committee (PMC) has invited Jiwei Guo
> https://github.com/Technoboy- to become a committer and we are pleased to
> announce
> that he has accepted.
>
> Jiwei has joi
+1
Penghui
On Nov 19, 2021, 2:29 AM +0800, Neng Lu , wrote:
> +1 for dropping the schema when a topic is deleted by default.
>
> I previously met a strange error that after creating a topic with the same
> name as previous deleted topic, the "ghost" schema is associated with the new
> topic agai
Hi Enrico,
I think we should cherry-pick the bug fixes, enhancements and test improvements?
Only the new features and document should not cherry-pick release branch.
And, do you see any issues introduced in release branch from the cherry-picking?
Thanks,
Penghui
On Nov 22, 2021, 5:38 PM +0800, E
Congratulations
Thnaks
ZhangJian He
陳智弘 于2021年11月22日周一 下午7:52写道：
> Congratulations！
>
> guo jiwei 於 2021年11月22日 週一 14:17 寫道：
>
> > Thanks to the community and to all the people who have helped me. I will
> > continue to work hard.
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
> >
> >
> > On Mon, No
Congratulations！
guo jiwei 於 2021年11月22日 週一 14:17 寫道：
> Thanks to the community and to all the people who have helped me. I will
> continue to work hard.
>
>
> Regards
> Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 2:07 PM Enrico Olivelli
> wrote:
>
> > Congrats!
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > Il Lun
Hello,
I believe that we should not cherry-pick changes to released branches
(branch-2.x) if there is no strong reason to do it.
I think that the only types of fixes that are eligible for cherry-picks are:
- security issues
- fixes for regressions
- fixes for serious bugs (but the change is not li
15 matches
Mail list logo
