This vote fails.
There is currently one open blocker, so I'll be waiting to prepare the
next RC. That will probably happen after the (US) long weekend.
Committers: *please* triage bugs you're looking at and mark them as
target 2.3.1 / blocker if you think they must be in 2.3.1. Otherwise
we end u
I'd like to bring https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24373 to
people's attention cause it could be a regression from 2.2.
I will leave it to more experienced people to decide whether this should be
a blocker or not.
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Marcelo Vanzin
wrote:
> Sure. Also,
Sure. Also, I'd appreciate if these bugs were properly triaged and
targeted, so that we could avoid creating RCs when we know there are
blocking bugs that will prevent the RC vote from succeeding.
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Xiao Li wrote:
> -1
>
> Yeah, we should fix it in Spark 2.3.1.
> ht
-1
Yeah, we should fix it in Spark 2.3.1.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24257 is a correctness bug. The
PR can be merged soon. Thus, let us have another RC?
Thanks,
Xiao
2018-05-23 8:04 GMT-07:00 chenliang613 :
> Hi
>
> Agree with Wenchen, it is better to fix this issue.
>
> Reg
Hi
Agree with Wenchen, it is better to fix this issue.
Regards
Liang
cloud0fan wrote
> We found a critical bug in tungsten that can lead to silent data
> corruption: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21311
>
> This is a long-standing bug that starts with Spark 2.0(not a regression),
> but s
We found a critical bug in tungsten that can lead to silent data
corruption: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21311
This is a long-standing bug that starts with Spark 2.0(not a regression),
but since we are going to release 2.3.1, I think it's a good chance to
include this fix.
We will also b
+1 Same result for me as with RC1.
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 2:45 PM Marcelo Vanzin wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 2.3.1.
>
> The vote is open until Friday, May 25, at 20:00 UTC and passes if
> at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Releas
Starting with my own +1. Did the same testing as RC1.
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:45 PM, Marcelo Vanzin wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 2.3.1.
>
> The vote is open until Friday, May 25, at 20:00 UTC and passes if
> at least 3 +1 PMC votes are ca
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version 2.3.1.
The vote is open until Friday, May 25, at 20:00 UTC and passes if
at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.3.1
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
To learn more about