Thanks, they should all be on the staging site now.
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Deron Eriksson
wrote:
> and maybe:
> ? systemml-0.10.0-incubating.pom.md5
>
> Also, the previous release had sha1 checksums. Do we need those too or is
> that overkill?
>
> Deron
>
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1
and maybe:
? systemml-0.10.0-incubating.pom.md5
Also, the previous release had sha1 checksums. Do we need those too or is
that overkill?
Deron
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Deron Eriksson
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noticed that
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Deron Eriksson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that not all the artifacts at
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.10.0-incubating-rc1/
> have md5 checksums.
>
> Also, the previous release (see
>
> https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/sys
good catch Deron - and I agree, adding the checksums should be fine.
Regards,
Matthias
From: Deron Eriksson
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 05/24/2016 08:42 PM
Subject:Re: missing release candidate checksums?
In my opinion, I don't think restarting the vo
In my opinion, I don't think restarting the vote is needed for this.
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Deron Eriksson
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noticed that not all the artifacts at
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/inc
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Deron Eriksson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that not all the artifacts at
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.10.0-incubating-rc1/
> have md5 checksums.
>
> Also, the previous release (see
>
> https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/sys
Hi,
I noticed that not all the artifacts at
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.10.0-incubating-rc1/
have md5 checksums.
Also, the previous release (see
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/systemml/systemml/0.9.0-incubating/)
featured sha1 checksums but the current r
