Mark Thomas wrote:
> Anas Ahmed wrote:
>
>> hello all,
>> must i have cygwin to compile tomcat on windows environment ??
>> since i have exception with "ant download" command when download JDT.
>>
>
> Nope. It works for me.
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> --
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
The methods on the interface are custom to a specific implementation.
And the backup manager for example, doesn't need these, nor does it use them
So not entirely intentional, just legacy that lives on.
Filip
Ian Darwin wrote:
While running an automated code testing tool of my own design I fou
While running an automated code testing tool of my own design I found
that a few of the accessors on this class are incorrect, or at least,
"setter silently ignored, getter returns hard-coded value".
Can anybody please tell me if this was intentional, or just something that's
not used anyway?
Anas Ahmed wrote:
> hello all,
> must i have cygwin to compile tomcat on windows environment ??
> since i have exception with "ant download" command when download JDT.
Nope. It works for me.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-
