Re: Reducing JIRA spam

2011-02-21 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
I agree with Martin - I've fixed several, especially while releases are being voted on, so the current "unreleased" version is actually already closed, and new things should go in the next one, but someone puts it in the one that is being voted on. On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Martin Grigoro

Re: [vote] release wicket 1.5-rc2

2011-02-21 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Do we still include the Doug Lea concurrent library? I though we removed that with our migration to Java 5? If so, we should remove the license and notice from our distribution Martijn On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote: > This vote is to release wicket 1.5-rc2 > > Branch: htt

Re: [vote] release wicket 1.5-rc2

2011-02-21 Thread Juergen Donnerstag
+1 Juergen On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Peter Ertl wrote: > +1 > > Am 21.02.2011 um 16:03 schrieb Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail: > >> +1 >> >> Also some quick testing on wicket-examples >> >> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Martin Grigorov >> wrote: >> >>> +1 to release it >>> >>> Tested

Re: [wicketstuff] core pom - not used dependencies

2011-02-21 Thread Erik van Oosten
Hi Atilla, You seem to have covered it. I think you know what you are doing. Regards, Erik. Op 21-02-11 09:23, Attila Király wrote: Hi Attila, Are you sure they are not used? They could be used transitively. No, I am not sure that's why I am asking. I searched the poms, the java files a

Re: Reducing JIRA spam

2011-02-21 Thread Martin Grigorov
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Martijn Dashorst < martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: > It appears that we can reduce the amount of spam JIRA sends to our > commits list by telling it not to send notifications when the fix-in > version is modified. I'd like that feature to be enabled... > I'm -0

Re: Reducing JIRA spam

2011-02-21 Thread Martin Grigorov
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Pedro Santos wrote: > fine by me also, can hudson integration messages be disabled also? > done. I have stopped those for 1.5.x few months ago, now they are stopped for 1.4.x too > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Martijn Dashorst < > martijn.dasho...@gmail.com

Re: [vote] release wicket 1.5-rc2

2011-02-21 Thread Martin Grigorov
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Andrea Del Bene wrote: > Hi Igor, > > I think you've missed jar wicket-core.jar in artifacts. I can't find it in > lib folder. > > Yep, confirmed. It is in https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewicket-031/org/apache/wicket/wicket-core/1.5-rc2/

Re: [vote] release wicket 1.5-rc2

2011-02-21 Thread Andrea Del Bene
Hi Igor, I think you've missed jar wicket-core.jar in artifacts. I can't find it in lib folder. Bye. This vote is to release wicket 1.5-rc2 Branch: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.5-rc2/ Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~ivaynberg/wicket-1.5-rc2/dist Maven repo:

Re: [vote] release wicket 1.5-rc2

2011-02-21 Thread Peter Ertl
+1 Am 21.02.2011 um 16:03 schrieb Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail: > +1 > > Also some quick testing on wicket-examples > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote: > >> +1 to release it >> >> Tested : >> - create quickstart from the staging repo, >> - checkout the branch from sv

Re: [vote] release wicket 1.5-rc2

2011-02-21 Thread Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail
+1 Also some quick testing on wicket-examples On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote: > +1 to release it > > Tested : > - create quickstart from the staging repo, > - checkout the branch from svn and build > - test most of the wicket-examples > > and I didn't found a single issu

Re: [vote] release wicket 1.5-rc2

2011-02-21 Thread Martin Grigorov
+1 to release it Tested : - create quickstart from the staging repo, - checkout the branch from svn and build - test most of the wicket-examples and I didn't found a single issue just one minor thing: the version is 1.5-rc2 (lower case 'rc'), while the previous was 1.5-RC1. This confused me in t

Re: 1.4.16 - adding methods to IBehavior

2011-02-21 Thread Johan Compagner
why not just introduce that interface and the impl in component? So why also alter abstract behavior? Because that would mean that suddenly almost all the behaviors that are used are suddenly also IComponentConfigurationBehavior And 99.9% of them don't do anything. On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 04:17,

Re: [wicketstuff] core pom - not used dependencies

2011-02-21 Thread Attila Király
Hi! 2011/2/21 Erik van Oosten > Hi Attila, > > Are you sure they are not used? They could be used transitively. > No, I am not sure that's why I am asking. I searched the poms, the java files and "mvn dependency:tree" reports but none of them contained the examples I mentioned before. > > Any

Re: [wicketstuff] core pom - not used dependencies

2011-02-21 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi Attila, Feel free to improve these projects however you find appropriate. Some of us watch the activity in wicketstuff-core and we will comment if we see anything suspicious. There is also Hudson build that will tell you if you break something. martin-g On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Attila