OK, thank you! We will focus on 0.8.0.
On 2017-08-17 18:58, moon soo Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 0.7.3 is a maintenance release, so in terms of new feature, I prefer to
> ship it in 0.8.0, so we can keep 0.7.3 as a stable release.
>
> We have a discussion thread for release 0.8.0 [1]. And I think we
OK, thank you! We will focus on 0.8.0.
On 2017-08-17 18:58, moon soo Lee mailto:m...@apache.org>>
wrote:
> Hi,>
>
> 0.7.3 is a maintenance release, so in terms of new feature, I prefer to>
> ship it in 0.8.0, so we can keep 0.7.3 as a stable release.>
>
> We have a discussion thread for r
Hi,
0.7.3 is a maintenance release, so in terms of new feature, I prefer to
ship it in 0.8.0, so we can keep 0.7.3 as a stable release.
We have a discussion thread for release 0.8.0 [1]. And I think we can
discuss there, more about 0.8.0 release which includes all the new
functionalities.
Does i
Hi, Moon!
Is there any possibility to include in 0.7.3 some critical functionality (for
Tinkoff) out of security scope? It will help us to upgrade our platform in more
stable mode. Now we are forced to use unstable version built from development
snapshot in production.
On 2017-08-16 18
Hi,
An issue for Release 0.7.3 [1] has created and some security issues are
linked. Please take a look and let us know if you have another security
issue need to be included.
Thanks,
moon
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2864
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:58 AM Yanbo Liang wrote:
Hi All,
Recently we sent some security features/fixes to Apache Zeppelin. Do you
have plan to release a new version in near future? Then we can upgrade our
Zeppelin to use these new features.
Thanks
Yanbo