在 2013年12月10日星期二 UTC+8下午5:28:21,Chris Pearce写道:
> Hi All,
>
> Can we start using C++ STL containers like std::set, std::map,
> std::queue in Mozilla code please? Many of the STL containers are more
> convenient to use than our equivalents, and more familiar to new
> contributors.
>
> I underst
On 22 April 2015 at 12:51, David Anderson wrote:
> To get some feedback on AsyncPanZoom we are enabling it on tonight's
> nightly, for Windows only. It will be re-disabled in the next nightly.
>
> For those unfamiliar, APZ makes scrolling responsive by pre-rendering more
> content than what is vi
Enabled it manually and this is so much nicer... Can't wait for this to be
the default :) Some odd behaviour I've noticed already, on Facebook.com the
site seems to occasionally layout as if the scroll-bar wasn't there (so
underneath it), and it seems to flip randomly as you scroll, for a while.
On
HTML5 spec suggests the style of and is:
abbr[title], acronym[title] { text-decoration: dotted underline; }
http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/rendering.html#phrasing-content-0
However, we still use:
abbr[title], acronym[title] { border-block-end: dotted 1px; }
Our style has trouble with some fonts w
Actually, forget just facebook, I'm seeing this on lots of sites. It
exhibits quite badly on wiki.mozilla.org too, for example.
--Chris
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Christopher Lord
wrote:
> Enabled it manually and this is so much nicer... Can't wait for this to be
> the default :) Some od
Bustage is not in any dictionary, breakage is.
On 2015-04-22 03:58, dev-platform-requ...@lists.mozilla.org wrote:
Send dev-platform mailing list submissions to
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.mozilla.org/list
On 22/04/2015 01:26, Mike Hommey wrote:
Here are a few crude stats, gathered over the last 25271 changesets,
assuming my pattern matching worked properly:
- 1438 changesets were backed out (~5.7%)
Thank you for some stats, which is clearly better than no stats at all!
(Like everyone else who
Le 22/04/2015 13:13, Gijs Kruitbosch a écrit :
> On 22/04/2015 01:26, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> Here are a few crude stats, gathered over the last 25271 changesets,
>> assuming my pattern matching worked properly:
>>
>> - 1438 changesets were backed out (~5.7%)
>
> Thank you for some stats, which is cl
Thanks for the feedback Kevin. I've tweaked the wording and provided
options for the cases where the respondent isn't the author of the
script/program/etc.
On 22 April 2015 at 05:29, Kevin Brosnan wrote:
> This form has some issues. There are required sections of "Downloading
> with scripts and
On 2015-04-22 8:02 AM, Julien Wajsberg wrote:
Inbound bustage should not happen. Try is not a waste of time. The time
you wait for your build result... well you can do something else during
that time, right? If you're really confident your work won't break
anything then you'll likely only wait a
On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 10:51:58 PM UTC-4, David Anderson wrote:
> We're interested in any significant behavior changes with APZ, and especially
> any situations in which we can't pre-render content fast enough. In this case
> you might see blank white areas of the screen while scrolling (a
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Masayuki Nakano wrote:
> HTML5 spec suggests the style of and is:
>
> abbr[title], acronym[title] { text-decoration: dotted underline; }
> http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/rendering.html#phrasing-content-0
>
> However, we still use:
> abbr[title], acronym[title] { bord
2 files summing to 90 MB of binary data (a Firefox installer) were checked
into fx-team a few hours ago.
While Mercurial (and Git) can handle binary files of this size,
transferring excessively large files adds overhead to systems and is a
barrier to contributors on slow connections. We therefore
Should we have a hook to catch this kind of thing?
-Jeff
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> 2 files summing to 90 MB of binary data (a Firefox installer) were checked
> into fx-team a few hours ago.
>
> While Mercurial (and Git) can handle binary files of this size,
> transf
Yes and there is now bug 1157367 for that.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Jeff Muizelaar
wrote:
> Should we have a hook to catch this kind of thing?
>
> -Jeff
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> > 2 files summing to 90 MB of binary data (a Firefox installer) were
> ch
On 2015/04/22 22:15, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Note that it's not just the turn around time that can become an issue.
For me personally the reasons I choose to not use the try server are:
1) If I have ~20 unlanded patches in my queue (which is normal for my
workflow on an average day), I need to jug
On 2015-04-21 1:29 PM, Kevin Brosnan wrote:
This form has some issues. There are required sections of "Downloading with
scripts and other programs" that only make sense for developers of the
script or download tool.
- Which protocols do you use ? (no idea whatever mozregression uses)
- P
On Wednesday, April 22, 2015 at 3:58:17 AM UTC-4, James May wrote:
> On 22 April 2015 at 12:51, David Anderson <@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > To get some feedback on AsyncPanZoom we are enabling it on tonight's
> > nightly, for Windows only. It will be re-disabled in the next nightly.
> >
> > F
Bobby Holley schrieb:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Nick Fitzgerald
wrote:
And this can surely be done via private channels, without public shaming
and the potential negatives people have listed elsewhere in the thread,
right?
How, exactly?I want the ability to see where I match up a
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Christopher Lord wrote:
> That sounds like a nice idea, though I wonder how you'd specify the duration
> of the application of the stylesheet via a media query?
I would put it in the stylesheet somehow I think. Putting yet more
style in markup as this proposal doe
On 23/04/2015 01:44, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> 2 files summing to 90 MB of binary data (a Firefox installer) were
> checked into fx-team a few hours ago.
>
> While Mercurial (and Git) can handle binary files of this size,
> transferring excessively large files adds overhead to systems and is
> a bar
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Christopher Lord wrote:
> down. I'm not a huge fan of all aspects of their proposal, so I've made my
> own: http://chrislord.net/?p=273&preview=1&_ppp=0afe20d87f
>
Seems the link is outdated?
___
dev-platform mailing li
22 matches
Mail list logo