On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 11:48 AM Nick Lamb wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 13:27:59 -0700
> Wayne Thayer via dev-security-policy
> wrote:
>
> > I'd like to ask for input from the community: is this a requirement
> > that we should add to the Mozilla policy at this time (effective
> > September 1, 202
Hi Clint,
The content of your email, the blog post and the Apple root policy all say
something a little different and may leave some room for interpretation by
the CAs. As it stands, things are a bit confused. Here's why:
Your mail is a little light on the details. While you say this is an
"up
Thanks Arvid! I think these are good starting points for discussion!
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 8:48 AM Arvid Vermote
wrote:
> When I initially raised the topic I had two things in mind:
>
> -What if a facility can’t be audited?
>
> -If main key management facilities are down can Web
On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 13:27:59 -0700
Wayne Thayer via dev-security-policy
wrote:
> I'd like to ask for input from the community: is this a requirement
> that we should add to the Mozilla policy at this time (effective
> September 1, 2020)?
If Mozilla adds this as a policy requirement it should also
When I initially raised the topic I had two things in mind:
-What if a facility can’t be audited?
-If main key management facilities are down can WebPKI CA meet SSLBR
4.9.1.2?
As for the inability to audit, a few things come to mind based on the previous
shared thoughts:
-
5 matches
Mail list logo