On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 20:03 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 02:16 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > > 1) More time to catch regressions
> >
> > In theory. In practice, it mostly means more wasted time until a
> > regression
> > is FIXED, i.e., it
On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 02:16 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > 1) More time to catch regressions
>
> In theory. In practice, it mostly means more wasted time until a
> regression
> is FIXED, i.e., it is entirely counterproductive. Many regressions
> are only
> noticed once
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> 1) More time to catch regressions
In theory. In practice, it mostly means more wasted time until a regression
is FIXED, i.e., it is entirely counterproductive. Many regressions are only
noticed once the update goes stable, because that's when most users start
trying i
On 4 November 2015 at 16:41, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote:
>> That's fine, but I think we already knew that? I mean, the suggestion
>> was to disable SELinux entirely (or at least put it in permissive
>> mode) when we added it to begin with. It is also one of the reasons
>> we limited
Josh Boyer wrote:
> That's fine, but I think we already knew that? I mean, the suggestion
> was to disable SELinux entirely (or at least put it in permissive
> mode) when we added it to begin with. It is also one of the reasons
> we limited it to rawhide only. I wouldn't want to ship it in a
> r
On 11/04/2015 09:00 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> According to fedora-review man page:
>
> -p, --prebuilt
> When using -n , use prebuilt rpms in current directory instead of
> building new ones in mock
>
> But if I try:
>
> fedora-review --prebuilt -n python-cycler-0.9.0-1.fc23.noarch.rpm
>
> I
Missing expected images:
Cloud disk raw i386
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Generic boot x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Workstation live i386
Generic boot i386
Kde live i386
Cloud disk raw x86_64
Kde live x86_64
Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151103:
Soas disk raw armhfp
Kde disk raw arm
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Scott Schmit wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 09:50:53AM -0800, Moez Roy wrote:
>> The IPv6 updates are breaking stuff (and probably increasing the
>> attack surface):
>>
>> Bug 1231946 - unbound-anchor ignores net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1
>> in /etc/sysctl.conf
Thanks for stepping up Jared!
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Jared K. Smith
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>
>> So, after almost 10 years, it's time to find someone else to take over
>> the Asterisk packages. If you're interested, reply to the list. I'd
>> pr
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-11-04)
===
Meeting started by ajax at 18:01:11 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-11-04/fesco.2015-11-04-18.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
According to fedora-review man page:
-p, --prebuilt
When using -n , use prebuilt rpms in current directory instead of
building new ones in mock
But if I try:
fedora-review --prebuilt -n python-cycler-0.9.0-1.fc23.noarch.rpm
I get this dialog:
You are attempting to run "mock" which requires
On 04 Nov 2015 09:20:00 -
Toby Goodwin wrote:
> As well as Fedora itself, we need to get the infrastructure IPv6
> ready. My company has developed an IPv6 health checker. Given a
> domain, it tests its nameservers, webservers, and mailservers for
> IPv6 readiness.
>
> Currently fedoraproject
On 04.11.2015 15:22, Pavel Simerda wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Zdenek Kabelac"
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> >
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 1:43:12 PM
> > Subject: Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas
> >
> > Dne 4.11.
On 4 November 2015 at 02:20, Toby Goodwin wrote:
> As well as Fedora itself, we need to get the infrastructure IPv6 ready.
> My company has developed an IPv6 health checker. Given a domain, it
> tests its nameservers, webservers, and mailservers for IPv6 readiness.
>
> Currently fedoraproject.org
On 4 November 2015 at 14:31, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 18:25:32 +
> Jonathan Underwood wrote:
>
>> Mostly agreed. The one legit use-case though is when someone wants to
>> to continue a package submission after a review has gone dead due to
>> the original submitter vanishing. T
- Original Message -
> From: "Toby Goodwin"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 10:20:00 AM
> Subject: Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas
>
> As well as Fedora itself, we need to get the infrastructure IPv6 ready.
Definitely.
On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 18:25:32 +
Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> Mostly agreed. The one legit use-case though is when someone wants to
> to continue a package submission after a review has gone dead due to
> the original submitter vanishing. There's often useful information you
> want to carry throu
On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 09:23:49 +0100
Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 3.11.2015 01:56, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > And with my proposed change to the release
> > policy (slip = unfreeze, sync all updates, refreeze), you could
> > also use the time to get fixes/improvements in that would have
> > otherwise misse
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2015-11-04 18:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets belo
- Original Message -
> From: "Zdenek Kabelac"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 1:43:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas
>
> Dne 4.11.2015 v 13:24 Petr Spacek napsal(a):
> > On 3.11.2015 18:5
Dne 4.11.2015 v 13:24 Petr Spacek napsal(a):
On 3.11.2015 18:50, Moez Roy wrote:
Hi Pavel Simerda,
The IPv6 updates are breaking stuff (and probably increasing the
attack surface):
Bug 1231946 - unbound-anchor ignores net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1
in /etc/sysctl.conf
https://bugzilla.redhat
On 3.11.2015 18:50, Moez Roy wrote:
> Hi Pavel Simerda,
>
> The IPv6 updates are breaking stuff (and probably increasing the
> attack surface):
>
> Bug 1231946 - unbound-anchor ignores net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1
> in /etc/sysctl.conf
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231946
>
On 11/04/2015 12:37 PM, Ian Kent wrote:
> Looks like the compose went ok too, based on the mail I saw.
Yes, looks like everything is properly rebuilt now. Thanks!
--
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of C
On 11/04/2015 06:37 AM, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 06:28 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> On 11/04/2015 01:35 AM, Ian Kent wrote:
I feel this is a better way to handle these issues
> than the bootstrapping option (which will be
> reverted from nfs-utils).
>>> I
On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 06:28 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On 11/04/2015 01:35 AM, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > I feel this is a better way to handle these issues
> > > > than the bootstrapping option (which will be
> > > > reverted from nfs-utils).
> > I think I've addressed these.
> >
> > But
Hey,
On 11/04/2015 01:35 AM, Ian Kent wrote:
>> I feel this is a better way to handle these issues
>> > than the bootstrapping option (which will be
>> > reverted from nfs-utils).
> I think I've addressed these.
>
> But we probably should do one last version bump in fedfs-utils and
> autofs to en
There is ongoing rebuild of Python3.5 in rawhide's side-tag f24-python3.
I would like to ask all maintainers to rebuild their packages (which
depend on python3) within the f24-python3 side-tag.
To rebuild your package simply run:
`fedpkg build --target f24-python3`
You can find all packages that
Compose started at Wed Nov 4 05:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0
As well as Fedora itself, we need to get the infrastructure IPv6 ready.
My company has developed an IPv6 health checker. Given a domain, it
tests its nameservers, webservers, and mailservers for IPv6 readiness.
Currently fedoraproject.org scores 4 out of 9, so there's some room for
improvement!
On Monday, 02 November 2015 at 11:31, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 2 November 2015 at 09:14, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I'm working on bringing libraries/tools for neuroscience and neuroimaging
> > into Fedora[0]. Now I'm packaging ANTs[1] (Advanced Normalization Tools
> > (ANTs)), but w
30 matches
Mail list logo
