Re: nss_myhostname as default in Fedora

On 25.1.2016 17:39, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 25.01.16 17:11, Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) wrote: > >> On 01/25/2016 03:23 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >>> On Mon, 25.01.16 09:08, Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) wrote: >>> > It is intended as a convenient fallback mechani

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

On 2016-01-25, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:34:55PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> A huge list of packages and owners follows. Please consider cleaning up >> your packages if you can. (Yes, I have some on the list, which >> I've fixed already.) Packager

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 16:34 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > beanstalkd (jjh, gnat) removed defattr. --  Nathanael -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: nss_myhostname as default in Fedora

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> >>> It is intended as a convenient fallback mechanism, and is only supposed >>> >>> to have an effect if 'gateway' is not defined in the local DNS (the >>> >>> 'domain' or 'search' zones). Would it help if those limitations were >>> >>> mo

Re: nss_myhostname as default in Fedora

>> >>> It is intended as a convenient fallback mechanism, and is only supposed >> >>> to have an effect if 'gateway' is not defined in the local DNS (the >> >>> 'domain' or 'search' zones). Would it help if those limitations were >> >>> more explicit, e.g. documented in nss-myhostname(8)? >> >> >>

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 06:16:13PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes: > > ZJ> Better to just run a script to fix those overnight, and than deal > ZJ> with any fallout. > > Sure, I could, but I figured it's at least worth informing people. > May

Re: dnf dependency information for koji builds

On 01/23/2016 04:14 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > It would be very helpful to have information on what packages are > pulling in what dependencies in the root.log of koji builds. Is this > possible with dnf? I've quickly hacked a proof-of-concept script to do that: https://gist.github.com/mizde

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

> "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes: ZJ> Better to just run a script to fix those overnight, and than deal ZJ> with any fallout. Sure, I could, but I figured it's at least worth informing people. Maybe there's some use case for this of which I'm not aware. Or perhaps I've made a mi

Re: Fedora Rawhide 20160125 compose check report

On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 12:21 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 15:57 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > > Missing expected images: > > > > Kde disk raw armhfp > > > > No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160124 > > > > Images in Rawhide 20160124 but not this: > > >

Re: dnf dependency information for koji builds

On 01/25/2016 11:37 AM, Michael Schroeder wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 04:26:43PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: >> On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 08:14:44 -0700 >> Orion Poplawski wrote: >> >>> It would be very helpful to have information on what packages are >>> pulling in what dependencies in the root.log o

Re: Needless use of %defattr (in 4464 packages)

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:34:55PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > A huge list of packages and owners follows. Please consider cleaning up > your packages if you can. (Yes, I have some on the list, which > I've fixed already.) Packagers with no owners listed might have been > orphaned or re

[Test-Announce] Planned Outage: Taskotron upgrade - 2016-01-26 @ 15:00 UTC

Planned Outage: taskotron.fedoraproject.org - 2016-01-26 15:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2016-01-26 15:00 UTC, which will last approximately 3 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-01-26

Re: The %license property is now supported in EPEL6 - breaks SCL build

> "RC" == Remi Collet writes: RC> FYI, I just open an issue to have this reverted. RC> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/5071 Well that was not particularly nice. Why can't we work together to fix any bugs? In any case, I can't reproduce the breakage myself using the sp

Re: Fedora Rawhide 20160125 compose check report

On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 15:57 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > Missing expected images: > > Kde disk raw armhfp > > No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160124 > > Images in Rawhide 20160124 but not this: > > Cloud_atomic vagrant virtualbox x86_64 > Cloud_atomic vagrant libvirt x86_6

Re: Debugging practices and hardened packages

On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 19:16:33 +0100, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > so you could well have an update that isn't the current one that has no > debuginfo on mirrors, but you could always get it from koji. If you have only a core file you know build-ids dumped there but not NVRAs. build-id -> NVRA mapping was

Re: Debugging practices and hardened packages

On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 20:12:44 +0300 Roman Tsisyk wrote: > One more question. > How long debuginfo packages are stored in repositories? > For example, someone may have an old version of package for which > debuginfo already has gone. How to debug in this case? They are kept just like any other sub

Re: Debugging practices and hardened packages

On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 18:12:44 +0100, Roman Tsisyk wrote: > How long debuginfo packages are stored in repositories? > For example, someone may have an old version of package for which debuginfo > already has gone. > How to debug in this case? ABRT retrace server has some storage and infrastructure f

Re: [design-suite] Broken packages

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 25/01/16 11:04 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >> On 24/01/16 14:35 -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga < >>> l...@fedoraproject.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Checking the nightly compose from D

Re: Build root prepared by DNF is way larger

mån 2016-01-25 klockan 18:09 +0100 skrev Marcin Juszkiewicz: > W dniu 25.01.2016 o 17:03, Vít Ondruch pisze: > > So it appears this thread was probably not enough. Which keeps us with > > interesting state where mock by default does not install weak > > dependencies where Koji installs them. It cau

Re: [design-suite] Broken packages

On 25/01/16 11:04 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 24/01/16 14:35 -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote: On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: Checking the nightly compose from Design Suite Lab[1], these packages are currently broken according to root.log[2] : Blender, LuxRender-Blender

Re[2]: Debugging practices and hardened packages

> Saturday, January 23, 2016 9:36 PM UTC from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > : > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 08:12:06PM +0300, Roman Tsisyk wrote: > > > Thursday, January 14, 2016 10:03 AM -06:00 from Michael Catanzaro > > > : > > > > > > > > > 'coredumpctl gdb' is great and you will enjoy it!

Re: Build root prepared by DNF is way larger

W dniu 25.01.2016 o 17:03, Vít Ondruch pisze: So it appears this thread was probably not enough. Which keeps us with interesting state where mock by default does not install weak dependencies where Koji installs them. It causes interesting issues already. mock/koji not installing weak dependenc

Re: hawaii

Hi, On Seg, 2016-01-25 at 13:40 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 22.1.2016 v 21:12 Pier Luigi Fiorini napsal(a): > > 2016-01-22 20:58 GMT+01:00 Kevin Fenzi : > > > On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 19:46:12 - > > > " mastaiza" wrote: > > > > > > > Yes hawaii-shell . > > > > Here on this page > > > > https:

Re: nss_myhostname as default in Fedora

On Mon, 25.01.16 17:11, Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) wrote: > On 01/25/2016 03:23 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Mon, 25.01.16 09:08, Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > >>> It is intended as a convenient fallback mechanism, and is only supposed > >>> to have an effect i

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

Change in package status over the last 168 hours 4 packages were orphaned lexertl [f23, f22, master] was orphaned by jjames Modular lexical analyzer generator https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/lexertl l

Re: nss_myhostname as default in Fedora

On 01/25/2016 03:23 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 25.01.16 09:08, Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) wrote: > >>> It is intended as a convenient fallback mechanism, and is only supposed >>> to have an effect if 'gateway' is not defined in the local DNS (the >>> 'domain' or 'search' zone

Re: Build root prepared by DNF is way larger

Dne 25.1.2016 v 17:03 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Dne 12.1.2016 v 15:18 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): >> Dne 18.8.2015 v 16:26 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Today, I noticed that mock build root prepared by DNF is significantly >>> larger then prepared by YUM (see attached logs). Owners of packa

Re: Build root prepared by DNF is way larger

Dne 12.1.2016 v 15:18 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Dne 18.8.2015 v 16:26 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): >> Hi all, >> >> Today, I noticed that mock build root prepared by DNF is significantly >> larger then prepared by YUM (see attached logs). Owners of packages >> installed into minimal buildroot probably wan

Fedora Rawhide 20160125 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde disk raw armhfp No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160124 Images in Rawhide 20160124 but not this: Cloud_atomic vagrant virtualbox x86_64 Cloud_atomic vagrant libvirt x86_64 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.gi

Re: AWS stuff in EPEL (aka: have I broke bodhi?)

On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 13:52:31 +0100 Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > Hello, > > I'm speaking about the following two bodhi updates: > > - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-49246e36a3 > - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-c576a00844 > > Both seems to

Re: nss_myhostname as default in Fedora

On Mon, 25.01.16 09:08, Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) wrote: > > It is intended as a convenient fallback mechanism, and is only supposed > > to have an effect if 'gateway' is not defined in the local DNS (the > > 'domain' or 'search' zones). Would it help if those limitations were > > more e

Re: nss_myhostname as default in Fedora

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/22/2016 01:06 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 01/21/2016 11:18 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > >> PS - There is some other discussion around "mymachines" which seems much >> more problematic. I'd like to just focus on myhostname for now. The >> gl

Re: nss_myhostname as default in Fedora

On Fri, 22.01.16 19:06, Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) wrote: > On 01/21/2016 11:18 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > PS - There is some other discussion around "mymachines" which seems much > > more > > problematic. I'd like to just focus on myhostname for now. The glibc > > maintainer ha

Re: Python naming guidelines clarification

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek schrieb am Do., 21. Jan. 2016 um 16:50 Uhr: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 02:36:00PM +0100, Jan Včelák wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Robert Kuska wrote: > > >> And what is the best current practice if the library contains some > > >> utilities. Should the ut

AWS stuff in EPEL (aka: have I broke bodhi?)

Hello, I'm speaking about the following two bodhi updates: - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-49246e36a3 - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-c576a00844 Both seems to be in both testing and pending testing status. How I did it? - Create the bodhi up

Re: hawaii

Dne 22.1.2016 v 21:12 Pier Luigi Fiorini napsal(a): > 2016-01-22 20:58 GMT+01:00 Kevin Fenzi >: > > On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 19:46:12 - > " mastaiza" mailto:mastaiza...@gmail.com>> > wrote: > > > Yes hawaii-shell . > > Here on this page > > https://fe

Re: keepassx 2.0?

On 13/01/16 11:07 +0200, Kari Koskinen wrote: It is not too late. The point of updates testing is to catch problems before they land in stable. Dealing with occasional downgrade is part of running up dates testing. At this point it seems clear that updating KeepasX to version 2 on Fedora 22 would

Re: [design-suite] Broken packages

On 24/01/16 14:35 -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote: On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: Checking the nightly compose from Design Suite Lab[1], these packages are currently broken according to root.log[2] : Blender, LuxRender-Blender, Synfig, Calligra-Krita synfig-0.64.3-8.fc24.x8

Re: dnf dependency information for koji builds

On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 04:26:43PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 08:14:44 -0700 > Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > It would be very helpful to have information on what packages are > > pulling in what dependencies in the root.log of koji builds. Is this > > possible with dnf? > >

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: Micro Bit

On 17/01/16, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > How does this relate to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113915? micro:bit MicroPython is a port with some key differences. No filesystem , everything is in one file appended to the end of the firmware, few extra modules like 'microbit'

Re: The %license property is now supported in EPEL6 - breaks SCL build

Le 24/01/2016 14:02, Remi Collet a écrit : >> epel-rpm-macros was added to the buildroot and buildsys-build group in comps >> which defines the macros FYI, I just open an issue to have this reverted. https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/5071 Remi. -- devel mailing list devel@l

F24 System Wide Change: Langpacks Using RPM Tags

= Proposed System Wide Change: Langpacks Using RPM Tags = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LangpacksInstallationWithRPMWeakDependencies Change owner(s): * Parag Nemade * Jan Silhan Langpacks installations is re-designed using language metapackages langpacks- and RPM weak dependencies (Sup

Re: nss_myhostname as default in Fedora

On 01/22/2016 10:45 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 07:06:26PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> On 01/21/2016 11:18 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> >>> PS - There is some other discussion around "mymachines" which seems much >>> more >>> problematic. I'd like to just