Updating package python-feedparser

Hi all, I was wondering if it would be possible, perhaps by a provenpackager, to update the abovementioned package. There already is a bug report for quite some time here [1]. The upstream discussion about this bug is here [2] and I even provided a pull request to make the update even easier. T

Re: packaging of nix

On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 12:52 PM Pratham Patel wrote: > > An update on the efforts: > > Running nix commands like `nix run nixpkgs#hello` works. And that's all that > works from what I've been able to test. Installing Nix software like > `home-manager` fails. You can actually do a `nix run home-m

Re: Update gumbo-parser to 0.12.1/libgumbo SONAME bump

On Fri, 2024-03-01 at 13:27 -0600, Jason Tibbitts wrote: > > > > > > Adam Williamson writes: > > > Honestly, we could really use more automation here, but it's a fairly > > hard thing to do *reliably* and there just isn't anybody specifically > > tasked with it so it doesn't happen. > > So sure,

Re: Update gumbo-parser to 0.12.1/libgumbo SONAME bump

> Adam Williamson writes: > Honestly, we could really use more automation here, but it's a fairly > hard thing to do *reliably* and there just isn't anybody specifically > tasked with it so it doesn't happen. So sure, we could use something but it doesn't have to start out as some complex fu

Re: Update gumbo-parser to 0.12.1/libgumbo SONAME bump

On Fri, 2024-03-01 at 09:34 +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote: > Am Fr., 1. März 2024 um 07:55 Uhr schrieb Ralf Corsépius > : > > > > Hi, > > > > I intend to update gumbo-parser to 0.12.1 in rawhide. > > This comes along with an soname bump libgumbo to libgumbo.so.2 > > > > This requires a rebuilt

Re: libxslxwriter (misspelled package) in zombie state

On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 11:49:06AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > We were discussing this on IRC, so just to bring the topic up on the > mailing list ... > > (1) Package libxslxwriter (note: "xslx") with only automated activity > and no builds: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libxslxwr

Re: packaging of nix

An update on the efforts: Running nix commands like `nix run nixpkgs#hello` works. And that's all that works from what I've been able to test. Installing Nix software like `home-manager` fails. You can actually do a `nix run home-manager/master -- init --switch` and you will get a "barebones" i

Fedora 40 compose report: 20240301.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-40-20240229.n.0 NEW: Fedora-40-20240301.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:15 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:916.85 MiB Size of

Re: Update gumbo-parser to 0.12.1/libgumbo SONAME bump

Am Fr., 1. März 2024 um 11:06 Uhr schrieb Ralf Corsépius : > BTW: f40 also is affected by the FTBFS. > > > How do you test the > > fitz plugin? > > No idea. All I did was to address the FTBFS ;) > > > (BTW: qpdfview needs to remove deprecated patchN, too.) > I know ;) > > I would suggest you to a

libxslxwriter (misspelled package) in zombie state

We were discussing this on IRC, so just to bring the topic up on the mailing list ... (1) Package libxslxwriter (note: "xslx") with only automated activity and no builds: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libxslxwriter/commits/rawhide https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=327

Re: Unresponsive maintainer: petersen / Pandoc package not updated since June 2023: Security vulnerability, CVE-2023-35936 (medium)

Am 01.03.24 um 07:55 schrieb Jens-Ulrik Petersen: On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 8:05 PM Christopher Klooz > wrote: __ The package "pandoc" remains at 3.1.3 in Fedora, but pandoc is already at 3.1.11.1. Among the updates since 3.1.3, there have been two securit

Re: Update gumbo-parser to 0.12.1/libgumbo SONAME bump

Am 01.03.24 um 10:29 schrieb Michael J Gruber: Am Fr., 1. März 2024 um 10:19 Uhr schrieb Ralf Corsépius : Am 01.03.24 um 09:34 schrieb Michael J Gruber: Am Fr., 1. März 2024 um 07:55 Uhr schrieb Ralf Corsépius : Hi, I intend to update gumbo-parser to 0.12.1 in rawhide. This comes along

Re: Update gumbo-parser to 0.12.1/libgumbo SONAME bump

Am Fr., 1. März 2024 um 10:19 Uhr schrieb Ralf Corsépius : > > > > Am 01.03.24 um 09:34 schrieb Michael J Gruber: > > Am Fr., 1. März 2024 um 07:55 Uhr schrieb Ralf Corsépius > > : > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I intend to update gumbo-parser to 0.12.1 in rawhide. > >> This comes along with an soname bu

Re: Update gumbo-parser to 0.12.1/libgumbo SONAME bump

Am 01.03.24 um 09:34 schrieb Michael J Gruber: Am Fr., 1. März 2024 um 07:55 Uhr schrieb Ralf Corsépius : Hi, I intend to update gumbo-parser to 0.12.1 in rawhide. This comes along with an soname bump libgumbo to libgumbo.so.2 This requires a rebuilt of several dependent packages, AFAICT: c

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40

Hi, Here's my contribution to this: error upgrading `flang-devel` https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267221 On 2024/02/21 8:11, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora

Re: Update gumbo-parser to 0.12.1/libgumbo SONAME bump

Am Fr., 1. März 2024 um 07:55 Uhr schrieb Ralf Corsépius : > > Hi, > > I intend to update gumbo-parser to 0.12.1 in rawhide. > This comes along with an soname bump libgumbo to libgumbo.so.2 > > This requires a rebuilt of several dependent packages, AFAICT: > claws-mail > litehtml > mupdf > perl-HTM

SPDX Statistics - Beginning of the year edition

Hot news:     fedora-license-data has Copr project https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/osci/fedora-license-data where new package is built whenever new PR is merged     The last phase is ready for wrangler https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_4 and we will proceed