On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:36:55AM +0300, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> >
> > If you open a bug on fuse-s3fs with the problem you encountered, I'll
> > gladly fix
> > it.
>
> ok,
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732939
>
Thanks, I'll take care of it today.
Neil
>
> >
> > I've tried the
>
> If you open a bug on fuse-s3fs with the problem you encountered, I'll gladly
> fix
> it.
ok,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732939
>
> I've tried the google code s3fs as well, and not had any luck in fixing it up.
> I think thats probably a dead end.
>
I've tried the rpm in th
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:22:42AM -0700, Jorge Gallegos wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:52:42PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 09:33:55AM -0700, Jorge Gallegos wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I opened the pasted review request above because fuse-s3fs (hint: need
> > > spon
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:52:42PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 09:33:55AM -0700, Jorge Gallegos wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I opened the pasted review request above because fuse-s3fs (hint: need
> > sponsor :) wouldn't work in my machine.
> > When I went to the Google code page
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 09:33:55AM -0700, Jorge Gallegos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I opened the pasted review request above because fuse-s3fs (hint: need
> sponsor :) wouldn't work in my machine.
> When I went to the Google code page I saw it had been three years with no
> commit while it never left alpha
Hi,
I opened the pasted review request above because fuse-s3fs (hint: need
sponsor :) wouldn't work in my machine.
When I went to the Google code page I saw it had been three years with no
commit while it never left alpha status, that's why I submitted a new
request for s3fs.
On Aug 23, 2011 4:47
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:12:55AM +0300, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> is this project still active ?
>
Yes, the project is still active.
> if not then fedora should have rpm for the other s3fs project <
> http://code.google.com/p/s3fs
>
> if so then the following lines in the code should be fixed
Th
In data 23/8/2011 10:12:55, Muayyad AlSadi ha scritto:
> is this project still active ?
>
> if not then fedora should have rpm for the other s3fs project <
> http://code.google.com/p/s3fs
Do you see this review request?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725292
--
Mario Santagiuliana
ww
is this project still active ?
if not then fedora should have rpm for the other s3fs project <
http://code.google.com/p/s3fs
if so then the following lines in the code should be fixed
#Set the env correctly
if self.AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID != None: