On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 01:33:22PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> cduce-0.5.3-3.fc13.i686 requires ocaml(runtime) = 0:3.11.1
Still not much happening upstream here.
> why-2.23-1.fc13.i686 requires ocaml(Types) =
> 0:c36604dc5d4202662cfca61be96c3303
I rebuilt this one today -- it sho
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 08:19:58PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today I've rebased parted to parted-2.1, this means that the libparted
> soname has changed, and all libparted using packages need to be rebuild:
>
> [h...@localhost ~]$ sudo repoquery -q --whatrequires
> 'libparted-1.9.so.
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 11:04:41AM -0600, Alan Dunn wrote:
[...]
I'd not realized that all the Fedora mailing lists had moved ...
> My first build of why in a while seems to have broken deps in Rawhide:
>
> why has broken dependencies in the development tree:
> On x86_64:
>why-2.23-1.fc1
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-postgresql/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31492
Modified Files:
ocaml-postgresql.spec
Log Message:
* Mon Jan 11 2010 Richard W.M. Jones - 1.12.3-3
- Ignore bogus thread module Provides which the automatic
ichard W.M. Jones - 0.3.3-3
+- Remove BR ocaml-camlidl. No longer required to build this.
+
* Wed Dec 30 2009 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.3.3-2
- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.2.
___
ocaml-devel mailing list
ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
$ make lint
rpmlint mingw32-freetype-2.3.11-1.fc13.src.rpm x86_64/*-2.3.11-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
(none): E: error while reading x86_64/*-2.3.11-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm:
'x86_64/*-2.3.11-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm'
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
This package is noarch, so it shouldn't be l
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:06:11AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> rjones:BADURL:expat-2.0.1.tar.gz:mingw32-expat
> rjones:BADURL:mingwrt-3.15.2-mingw32-src.tar.gz:mingw32-runtime
> rjones:BADURL:PDCurses-3.4.tar.gz:mingw32-pdcurses
> rjones:BADURL:w32api-3.13-mingw32-src.tar.gz:mingw32-w32api
> rjones
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 02:04:16PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> ocaml-camlimages-3.0.2-1.fc13.i686 requires ocaml(Image_intf) =
> 0:f81d11976accf8db51fbce0ac90013cb
A bug .. now fixed.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
libguestfs let
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 05:36:18PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 04:21:08PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:06:11AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > rjones:BADURL:expat-2.0.1.tar.gz:mingw32-expat
> > > rjones:BA
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:26:11PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> cduce-0.5.3-3.fc13.i686 requires ocaml(runtime) = 0:3.11.1
I just nudged upstream about this one again.
> 1:libguestfs-1.0.81-1.fc13.i686 requires /usr/lib/libxtables.so.2
Unannounced soname bump ... I've kicked off a
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 01:59:47PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> 1:libguestfs-1.0.81-2.fc13.i686 requires /usr/lib/libplybootsplash.so.2
Another unannounced soname bump (different from yesterday).
Rebuilding again ...
Even after rebuilding libguestfs will be uninstallable unless you
manual
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 02:09:57PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> 1:libguestfs-1.0.81-3.fc13.i686 requires /lib/libntfs-3g.so.71
Long story, but I've fixed this upstream now. It should be fixed in
Rawhide by tomorrow (not today).
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:19:49PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> Hello,
> In Fedora 12 several daemons (e.g. dhclient) were modified to drop
> unnecessary capabilities, most importantly the "dac_override"
> capability, allowing the daemon to ignore file permission bits. This,
> in combination wit
Is there better documentation on how multilib works and how to resolve
multilib problems than
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MultilibTricks ? I
understand that it uses various heuristics before it corrupts files,
but those don't seem to be documented.
I just spent half a day tracki
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 02:08:10PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> - If the file in both packages is identical, installation is allowed
> and the file is written
> - If the file in both packages is an ELF binary, the file used is the
> file in the package for the primary architecture
> - If the
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:35:19PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> ...except looking at libguestfs-1.0.75-1.fc12, it *has* been built with
> internal dependency generator, and it gives:
>
> Preparing...###
> [100%]
> file /usr/bin/lib
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 06:43:35PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Note that rpm < 4.6.0 did behave differently here: packages with
> conflicting files were allowed to be installed in the same transaction but
> not if installed separately, leading to strange situations. So if there's
> a chance
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 05:18:33PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> 1:libguestfs-1.0.81-5.fc13.i686 requires /usr/lib/libxtables.so.4
> 1:libguestfs-1.0.81-5.fc13.i686 requires /usr/lib/libip6tc.so.0
> 1:libguestfs-1.0.81-5.fc13.i686 requires /usr/lib/libip4tc.so.0
> 1:libgues
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 04:52:28PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 22:10:13 +0100
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 01:58:56PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:46:08AM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> 1:libguestfs-1.5.2-4.fc14.i686 requires /lib/libxtables.so.4
> 1:libguestfs-1.5.2-4.fc14.x86_64 requires /lib64/libxtables.so.4
Unfortunately qemu isn't installable at the moment so I can't rebuild
this. The error is:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 11:01:45PM +0100, M A Young wrote:
> What is the policy on creating private branches under fedpkg/git? Can it
> be done by anyone with acl commit or do you need special permissions?
>
> My interest is that I had a private branch of the kernel package under CVS
> which I u
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 03:14:05PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 06:21:00PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:46:08AM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> > > 1:libguestfs-1.5.2-4.fc14.i686 requires /lib/libxtables.so.4
> >
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:25:42AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> fedpkg push (this step could be skipped with "fedpkg commit -p")
Is there any essential difference between 'fedpkg push' and plain
'git push'?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjone
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:39:02AM -0700, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 09:12 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > But I guess git
> > will be storing a lot of redundant stuff and forcing extra pulls if you
> > work
> > that way. :-(
>
> It looks like the current implementation of "fe
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 06:16:52PM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello All!
>
> I'm currently in process of automatic enlisting of all ~10K Fedora Git
> repos at Ohloh. Right now roughly 7% of repositories were added and
> overall process will be finished in a 20-30 hours (it takes me about
> 5-1
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:20:51PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> (Sorry about the length of this email)
>
> Python 2.7 deprecated the PyCObject API in favor of a new "capsule" API.
> http://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/2.7.html#capsules
> (b) try to fix the ones that are self-contained; send f
Thanks for the tip. It's sort of annoying that this new API is not in
Python < 2.7, necessitating a bunch of #ifdef's in the code. This is
the patch I came up with:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2010-August/msg00053.html
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http:
Last year I had the same error:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2009-October/039845.html
Now I'm getting it again:
fedpkg update
[...]
Creating a new update for libguestfs-1.4.2-1.fc13
libguestfs-1.4.2-1.fc13 not tagged as an update candidate
What does this error mea
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:01:06AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 8/17/10 10:48 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > Last year I had the same error:
> >
> > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipe
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 07:05:18PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> The working could be better ...
'wording' even.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a
live C
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 01:10:29PM +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
> Fedora Engineering Services
> (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Engineering_Services) received
> request to get rid of file requires outside of the primary paths
> (https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-engineering-services/ticket/31).
>
>
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 08:02:13AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> I am a libguestfs user and I'm complaining. It means I have to schlep
> down a bunch of extra info on every update of libguestfs and that sucks
> on my bandwidth.
This is basically a hard problem to solve. We rely on copying files
dire
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:43:16PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trie
This one too:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radix_tree
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compi
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 07:29:35PM -0700, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 22:43 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 08:02:13AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > > I am a libguestfs user and I'm complaining. It means I have to schlep
>
Is it OK to use 'git rebase -i' to compress my mistakes together into
a single working Fedora git commit? (Provided I don't push things in
between or otherwise try to rewrite public history)
I'm a bit confused by whether 'fedpkg commit', 'fedpkg build', 'fedpkg
push' etc are doing magic that will
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 04:42:17PM +, Branched Report wrote:
> 1:libguestfs-1.5.2-4.fc14.i686 requires /lib/libxtables.so.4
This seems to be a warning about an older version than what's
currently in F14:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=190165
https://admin.fedorapro
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:20:52PM +0200, Christof Damian wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 23:06, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Till Maas wrote:
> >> If they like a faster bootup, then yes, they will. And I as a
> >> workstation user like it.
> >>
> >
> > [citation needed]
> >
> > I
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 01:38:00PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> Anyway, I've always read the boot time thing as just a bit of fun had by
> those who probably notice it the most. I've yet to be convinced it
> really matters to everyone else any more,
libguestfs cares (and you'll care if you're waiti
I just upgraded 'man' on one of my rawhide machines, and this
has obsoleted the old man package and installed man-db.
This appears to have changed how 'less' processes man page (nroff) files.
Previously, doing:
less foo.1
would automagically process the file through:
(echo ".pl 11i"; cat f
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 03:14:12PM +, Branched Report wrote:
> 1:libguestfs-1.5.5-1.fc14.i686 requires febootstrap >= 0:2.8
> 1:libguestfs-1.5.5-1.fc14.x86_64 requires febootstrap >= 0:2.8
Yup, this is a cock-up.
I pushed libguestfs and febootstrap on the same day to testing
(libg
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:25:29AM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> Quote from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_acceptance_criteria:
>
> All other updates must either:
> · reach the criteria laid out in the previous section OR
> · reach the positive Bodhi karma threshold specifie
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 07:24:58PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> I need to make a minor edit to one of the sources of a package. I want the
> sources on my machine in a state so that emacs will recognize the files are
> under git control and act accordingly, so I can do my edits and use emacs
> v
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 10:44:27AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> "Richard W.M. Jones" writes:
>
> > For libguestfs I'm doing it manually. I have my own git repo which is
> > a clone of the upstream libguestfs git repo. In that git repo I have
> > t
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 12:23:01PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> mingw32-OpenSceneGraph-2.8.2-4.fc14.noarch requires
> mingw32(libpng-3.dll)
I've asked the maintainer about this, but no response so far. See also:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=51#c8
> mingw32-libvi
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 06:11:21PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 05:06:20PM +0100, Robert Spanton wrote:
> > I've recently had to link a fair amount of my work statically so that
> > it'll run on a cluster of RHEL machines. Unfortunately, I am just a
> > user of these machi
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 06:32:20PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones píše v Čt 16. 09. 2010 v 17:19 +0100:
> > There are times when static linking is a useful. Robert clearly
> > describes one in his original post.
> Static libraries solve the "unprivilege
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 01:51:03AM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> 2010/9/21 Toshio Kuratomi :
> > As the concept of using third party repositories (both as packagers and as
> > users) grows, this interdependence will grow.
>
> Ok, so maybe it's time to setup Fedora "backports" repo for these th
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:58:53PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> 2010/9/20 Michał Piotrowski :
> > 2010/9/21 Toshio Kuratomi :
> >> As the concept of using third party repositories (both as packagers and as
> >> users) grows, this interdependence will grow.
> >
> > Ok, so maybe it's time to setu
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:07:24PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:24 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> > This is reasonably easy to fix: we should do some testing and withhold
> > packages from Rawhide if they don't pass some basic sanity check
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 02:06:12PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:58:53PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> >> 2010/9/20 Michał Piotrowski :
> >> > 2010/9/21 Toshio Kuratomi
I should add that whether this testing happens in Koji or in AutoQA
isn't material. AutoQA is probably better. *Provided* that if the
basic sanity tests fail they must prevent the packages from going into
the Rawhide compose.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 09:22:21AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:24:38 +0100,
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> >
> > I use Rawhide on my laptop and one of my servers, so I'll tell you the
> > answer to this: because cri
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 04:22:45PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:13 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > It isn't going to be perfect, but it'll definitely be better than what
> > > we have now.
> >
> > I'm still not going to use rawhide. Ther
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:01:16PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Is it really necessary to include entire package change logs in the
> rpm changelog? What is wrong with referencing either the included
> changelog or a URL to a changelog that people can go and reference. I
> remember this being dis
If you've been following updates to F14 alpha/beta, you'll undoubtedly
have been hit by:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638091
which makes everything segfault and is unrecoverable without a live CD
and a lot of manual intervention.
A simple "does it boot" test in fact wouldn't have
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 02:00:46PM +0100, Tim Waugh wrote:
> In system-config-printer I try to get it to modify the firewall to allow
> in the various network query responses that we expect, [...]
I should note, although it's not your fault, that this breaks
libvirt networking.
libvirt needs to a
F14 seems to have acquired a misfeature where if you mistype a command
or a command is not found, it prints "Command not found." then pauses
for some time, then (sometimes, not always) displays some sort of
error[1].
How do I permanently disable this behaviour?
Rich.
[1] I think it was a yum o
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 02:17:49AM +0200, Dennis J. wrote:
[...]
I asked Dan Berrange to join this thread since he's most knowledgable
about the exact problem and requirements from the libvirt side.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-df l
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 01:04:40PM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Mike McLean wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626209
> > Reported against F13, but I've encountered it in F14 Beta.
> >
> > Seems like more folks ought to be impacted by this bug t
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 11:40:50AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 09:51:31 +0100, Richard wrote:
>
> >
> > F14 seems to have acquired a misfeature where if you mistype a command
> > or a command is not found, it prints "Command not found." then pauses
> > for some time, then
The errors below happen several times during the yum update.
Assuming that they must be generated by RPM %post scripts, I had a
look at the affected packages (control-center, evolution-data-server,
cheese, seahorse) and I suspect it's a problem with the
update-mime-database command.
Rich.
Upd
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 01:54:55PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Montag, den 04.10.2010, 11:58 +0100 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
> > The errors below happen several times during the yum update.
> >
> > Assuming that they must be generated by RPM %post scripts, I
Seems quite complex. What's wrong with a directory:
/etc/iptables.d/
where RPMs like libvirt just drop the required additional rules (in a
separate chain if you like) and restart the iptables service? It's
low-tech but simple and it's all that libvirt needs.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtual
I installed and played with Ubuntu 10.10 over the weekend (in a VM),
and I have to say that their installer is very smooth indeed. It's
starting to make anaconda look distinctly clunky.
Some of the things it does which are IMHO better:
- starts disk formatting / copying / installing in paralle
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 09:51:41AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> I would like to see you create a Fedora Remix spin with this change to
> illustrate the benefits. That way we can evaluate feasibility and
> overall value add before we dive head first into it across the whole
> project.
Proving what?
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:37:15AM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> On 10/11/2010 10:21 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 09:51:41AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> I would like to see you create a Fedora Remix spin with this change to
> >> illustrate
As the subject says.
The yubikey still works fine for logging to FAS at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/
My regular FAS password works fine at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/
Is yubikey supposed to work on these other sites?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat ht
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:49:39PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> You can reproduce the bug like this:
> curl -o iputils-20071127-10.fc13.x86_64.rpm --range 1384-1400
> ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/releases/13/Fedora/x86_64/os/Packages/iputils-20071127-10.fc13
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 04:21:11PM +0300, Marius Andreiana wrote:
> How can Fedora work out of the box with apps requiring env variables like
> JAVA_HOME, M2_HOME ?
>
> Today, even though fedora provides java & maven, one still has to manually
> set these vars. Should Fedora java/maven packages se
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 04:50:43PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 15:40 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, James Antill said:
> > > Putting my really old sysadmin hat on, one other reason for
> > > having /tmp, /var and /usr as separate mount points was so that you
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 07:24:05PM +0100, Paul F. Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm still trying to get to the bottom as to why mono is failing to build
> on koji as either a scratch build or as a live build and I've come
> across this on the x86 build - can anyone shed any light on it as it's
> about
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:28:55AM +0200, nodata wrote:
> The default behaviour is that a user must know and supply a passphrase
> in order to mount an encrypted volume. This is good: know the
> passphrase, you get to mount the volume.
>
> What I am concerned about is that the volume is mounted
[Sorry for the late reply, best to CC me in]
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:21:18AM +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> I've recently been trying to package laby[1]
>
> In the middle of building it in mock, I come across this error:
>
> > DEBUG: + make -j2
> > DEBUG: ocamlfind: Package `lablgtk2' not found
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:44:52PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 10/28/2010 01:11 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> * #480 F15Feature - RemoveSETUID (
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RemoveSETUID ) (nirik,
> 19:15:16)
> * AGREED: the feature is approved. (nirik, 19:26:46)
>
>
> Th
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 02:24:02AM -0400, Jon Stanley wrote:
> I noticed on my Fedora 13 box that in the RPM macro %__global_cflags
> that -frecord-gcc-switches is missing, which is a nifty compiler
> feature that will record the flags passed to gcc in a section in the
> object file, thus aiding in
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:27:16AM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> collectd-snmp-4.10.0-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.20()(64bit)
I just started a new build, should be fixed tomorrow.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-df list
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 07:19:15PM +, Paul Howarth wrote:
> Any suggestions?
We've encountered some funny things about tmpfs before: It doesn't
support O_DIRECT at all, for example, necessitating workarounds in
libguestfs/qemu. Just speculating, but maybe it doesn't support
extended attribute
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/
is missing dist-f14-build-current ...
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages. http://et.redhat.com/~rj
Here's another problem:
Prelink erases file-based capabilities.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456105
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 04:10:31PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> If the maintainer is not responding to reports or not acting as the link
> to upstream ( that if he's not upstream himself ) for the component he's
> responsable for in Fedora I ask you this why are those components in
>
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 02:11:22AM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> Interesting move: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/551
>
> Has anyone looked into bringing Wayland to Fedora? If not this might be the
> right time getting involved in the discussion.
>
> http://wayland.freedesktop.
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 09:28:53AM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> Compose started at Fri Nov 5 08:15:13 UTC 2010
>
> Broken deps for x86_64
> --
> 3Depict-0.0.2-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.6.0)(64bit)
etc.
Is it saf
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 12:07:30PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:57:56AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 02:11:22AM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> > > Interesting move: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/55
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 03:16:11PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) said:
> > > Has anyone looked into bringing Wayland to Fedora? If not this might be
> > > the
> > > right time getting involved in the
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:36:43AM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 11/06/2010 12:21 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 03:16:11PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >> Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) said:
> >>>> Has anyone looke
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 09:20:08AM +, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> > If I wanted to step back to the pre-net era, I'd run Windows.
>
> I wonder if there will be someone saying (when all the apps are native
> Wayland apps) "If I wanted to step back to the pre-stetic* era, I'd
> run X"
>
> I get the
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 11:51:37AM +, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> > Is Fedora for developers or what?
>
> If it is exclusively for developers with the exclusion of general
> purpose features such as web browsing, photo management, and
> multimedia consumption then I'll have to find a more general p
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 01:51:32PM +, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> > I believe it is possible to do photo management, web browsing and
> > watching video, even on the current version of Fedora.
>
> Indeed. It's not the point that it's possible or not. I could do much
> of that on a Windows 3.11 mach
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 03:07:04PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le samedi 06 novembre 2010 à 10:57 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
>
> > Is Fedora for developers or what?
> >
> > We want to ditch extremely useful, ground-breaking features because of
> >
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 03:14:57PM +, Pierre Carrier wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 13:51, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> >> With virtualization I have more Linux machines than ever (about 50 in
> >> active use at last count). All on my local 1GB network. Consequently
> >> I use X to them and to ot
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 04:52:02PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le samedi 06 novembre 2010 à 14:21 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
> >
> > Why throw away everything just so we can make input better?
>
> Because those are just the examples I know where X11 has been bl
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 05:28:08PM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> First I think you should probably head over to the Wayland mailing list and
> get involved there. That's something I also recommend to Richard because if
> you want certain features to be present now is a good time to make y
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:57:03AM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> I create a new package.
> At install, we need to ask for some quesitons to the user to
> preconfigure the application.
As others have said, this is a bad idea and not permitted for Fedora.
Personally I think it's a misfeature of apt
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:25:04PM -0500, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
> Calling it a misfeature is a mistake. Just because you don't want to use it
> doesn't mean it shouldn't be there.
I'm perfectly capable of configuring priorities and frontends in dpkg,
thanks for your concerns. However it's n
Good timing! I have a related BTRFS / Fedora 16 question.
I have used the "btrfs" Anaconda option, and I get btrfs appearing as
a choice in the menus. However if I just change the root filesystem
to btrfs, then I would get:
/boot /dev/sda2
PV
VG
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 09:13:56AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Well it should be more like
>
> /boot/dev/sda1
> swap/dev/sda2
> btrfs
Maybe I don't understand this. Is btrfs on /dev/sda3, or are the swap
and root filesystems somehow combined on /dev/sda2? And if the
latter, how does one
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 03:06:33PM +0100, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> On 07/14/2011 03:03 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 09:13:56AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> >>Well it should be more like
> >>
> >>/boot/dev/sda1
> >>swap/d
I have a package that supplies translated man pages (only in Ukrainian
strangely enough). They are installed by the upstream under:
%{_mandir}/uk/man1/
%{_mandir}/uk/man3/
Maybe my Google-fu is failing me, but I can't find any guidelines on
how to package these for Fedora. Should I create
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:09:21AM +0200, Andreas Bierfert wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 08:57 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I have a package that supplies translated man pages (only in Ukrainian
> > strangely enough). They are installed by the upstream under:
> >
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 02:46:30PM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> This article recommends ending /etc/sysconfig
>
> http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/on-etc-sysinit.html
I'm sympathetic to Lennart's arguments, but really this should be
discussed and decided in the context of a real, open forum, drawi
1 - 100 of 3293 matches
Mail list logo
