As an exercise I scanned the top few (highest numbered) PRs to assess
their commitability from MY personal point of view, found one
immediately committable and did, the rest are:
#1482 still open question if it should revert to previous bad behaviour.
#1481 work in progress
#1478 improvement
On 2017-04-28 06:35 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
...
Geany is almost entirely an interactive application, so until
interactive tests are possible I don't think technical tests like
these will add a great deal to the committability of PRs.
If the tests just test functions, all it needs is to get
...
>>
>> Geany is almost entirely an interactive application, so until
>> interactive tests are possible I don't think technical tests like
>> these will add a great deal to the committability of PRs.
>
>
> If the tests just test functions, all it needs is to get Geany started up,
> then the
On 2017-04-28 05:35 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
On 29 April 2017 at 09:55, Matthew Brush wrote:
On 2017-04-28 02:35 PM, Thomas Martitz wrote:
Am 27.04.2017 um 22:51 schrieb Vasiliy Faronov:
Hi all,
From discussions elsewhere, such as [1], it sounds like one of the
things
On 29 April 2017 at 09:55, Matthew Brush wrote:
> On 2017-04-28 02:35 PM, Thomas Martitz wrote:
>>
>> Am 27.04.2017 um 22:51 schrieb Vasiliy Faronov:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> From discussions elsewhere, such as [1], it sounds like one of the
>>> things holding back Geany
On 2017-04-28 02:35 PM, Thomas Martitz wrote:
Am 27.04.2017 um 22:51 schrieb Vasiliy Faronov:
Hi all,
From discussions elsewhere, such as [1], it sounds like one of the
things holding back Geany development right now is a need for more
testing.
Helping to test PRs is truly needed, and much
Am 27.04.2017 um 22:51 schrieb Vasiliy Faronov:
Hi all,
From discussions elsewhere, such as [1], it sounds like one of the
things holding back Geany development right now is a need for more
testing.
Helping to test PRs is truly needed, and much appreciated.
However, I do think that Geany