On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> Yeah
> How we detect what keyboard is present?
Wouldn't you be better of using xkeys or what ever gtk uses and they
you don't need to what keyboard is present, it would just work.
Peter
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Walter Bender
>
james wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 01:04:06AM -0400, Raul Gutierrez Segales wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 21:33 -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Gonzalo Odiard
> > > wrote:
> > > > Yeah
> > > > How we detect what keyboard is present?
> >
> > http:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 01:04:06AM -0400, Raul Gutierrez Segales wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 21:33 -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> > > Yeah
> > > How we detect what keyboard is present?
>
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Firmware_q3a44 m
On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 21:33 -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> > Yeah
> > How we detect what keyboard is present?
>
> You can possible to detect the XO 1, which guarantees a membrane
> keyboard. And a non-OLPC machine, which guarantees a non-mem
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> Yeah
> How we detect what keyboard is present?
You can possible to detect the XO 1, which guarantees a membrane
keyboard. And a non-OLPC machine, which guarantees a non-membrane
keyboard. It is the XO 1.5 that is at issue. I'll look into it
Yeah
How we detect what keyboard is present?
Gonzalo
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Paul Fox wrote:
> > i'd like to bring this discussion to a conclusion.
> >
> > i'm starting to be a fan of this proposal of bert's -- it's very
> > simpl
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Paul Fox wrote:
> i'd like to bring this discussion to a conclusion.
>
> i'm starting to be a fan of this proposal of bert's -- it's very
> simple, keeps the keys the same in sugar and in gnome, and on
> membrane and non-membrane keyboards, it's backwards compatibl
i'd like to bring this discussion to a conclusion.
i'm starting to be a fan of this proposal of bert's -- it's very
simple, keeps the keys the same in sugar and in gnome, and on
membrane and non-membrane keyboards, it's backwards compatible
with existing use on XO-1, and the volume/ brightness key
On 17.07.2010, at 09:31, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Thu, 15-07-2010 a las 23:08 -0400, Paul Fox escribió:
>> i think everyone (except
>> apple, i'm learning tonight) agrees this is the correct setup
>> when not in sugar.
>
> Lenovo also seems to be switching to the Apple layout:
>
> http://ww
El Thu, 15-07-2010 a las 23:08 -0400, Paul Fox escribió:
> i think everyone (except
> apple, i'm learning tonight) agrees this is the correct setup
> when not in sugar.
Lenovo also seems to be switching to the Apple layout:
http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/thinkpadedgepost1
daniel wrote:
> On 15 July 2010 18:26, Walter Bender wrote:
> > Presumably there is a way to detect which keyboard is installed in the
> > machine? While I love Gonzalo's use of the F5-F8 keys, the need for
> > Frame and Journal keys on the non-membrane keyboards is more important
> > in my e
On 15 July 2010 18:26, Walter Bender wrote:
> Presumably there is a way to detect which keyboard is installed in the
> machine? While I love Gonzalo's use of the F5-F8 keys, the need for
> Frame and Journal keys on the non-membrane keyboards is more important
> in my experience.
Yes, let's limit
> This is a regression. It used to (2007) return keycodes.
>
> May be. Where is the keyboard definition?
Gonzalo
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> May be it's too late, but i was modifying Paint to use the slider keys
> (F5,F6,F7,F8) to change the size of the brush. I know there aren't other
> uses of slider in Sugar, but I think it's useful and expressive to have keys
> to enlarge or
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> May be it's too late, but i was modifying Paint to use the slider keys
> (F5,F6,F7,F8) to change the size of the brush. I know there aren't other
> uses of slider in Sugar, but I think it's useful and expressive to have keys
> to enlarge or
May be it's too late, but i was modifying Paint to use the slider keys
(F5,F6,F7,F8) to change the size of the brush. I know there aren't other
uses of slider in Sugar, but I think it's useful and expressive to have keys
to enlarge or reduce the brush, the fonts,etc.
If we need F5 and F6 to the jou
On 15 Jul 2010, at 23:59, Tim McNamara wrote:
> On 16 July 2010 10:50, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Under non-sugar environments (e.g. GNOME), myself and Paul are in
> agreement that in order to change brightness and volume, you should
> press e.g. Fn+F9 (to decrease brightness).
>
> This matches beha
On 16 July 2010 10:50, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Under non-sugar environments (e.g. GNOME), myself and Paul are in
> agreement that in order to change brightness and volume, you should
> press e.g. Fn+F9 (to decrease brightness).
>
> This matches behaviour of "normal" laptops, including the Dell that
18 matches
Mail list logo
