The patch here makes the build system not assume that all arm systems are
using netbsd. This was pulled from the Debian patch set.
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org$Id: 301_not_all_arm_boxes_run_netbsd.diff 834 2003-12-10 07:13:21Z wt $
This patch by Michel Dänzer
The following CVS commit, made by Thomas Dickey, has no indication that
Thomas was either a) not involved at all in the patch or b) that Thomas
found Ralf Habacker's patch and committed a modified version of that patch.
The CVS log message says:
fixes for _XtInherit on cygwin.
The hw/xfree86
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> The following CVS commit, made by Thomas Dickey, has no indication that
> Thomas was either a) not involved at all in the patch or b) that Thomas
> found Ralf Habacker's patch and committed a modified version of that patch.
>
> The CVS log message say
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
The following CVS commit, made by Thomas Dickey, has no indication that
Thomas was either a) not involved at all in the patch or b) that Thomas
found Ralf Habacker's patch and committed a modified version of that patch.
The CVS lo
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> > Your commit didn't mention this either.
>
> Our change log is in our release notes, where the changes were
> attributed to Ralf Habacker:
tsk, tsk: the actual commit on the code change bears only your name.
A casual reader of that commit (and of t
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> XFree86 should be taking care not to steal credit for our patches by
> committing them without proper attribution.
your standards are inconsistent: your committing the change rather than
offering commit access to someone who solved a problem that (ac
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Your commit didn't mention this either.
Our change log is in our release notes, where the changes were
attributed to Ralf Habacker:
tsk, tsk: the actual commit on the code change bears only your name.
A casual reader of that co
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Solaris 2.5.1 x86, XFree86 4.4.0 RC1 (and 4.3.0) won't start, with the
> following error:
> Fatal server error:
> xf86MapVidMem: mmap failure: No such device or address
> as a result of the xf86MapVidMem call in SetResetBIOSVars from
> xc/progr
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
indeed. you have made it onto that select list of people whose patches
I have to scrutinize.
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 01:25:52PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
>The following CVS commit, made by Thomas Dickey, has no indication that
>Thomas was either a) not involved at all in the patch or b) that Thomas
>found Ralf Habacker's patch and committed a modified version of that patch.
>
>The C
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Thomas Dickey wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>Your commit didn't mention this either.
> >>
> >>Our change log is in our release notes, where the changes were
> >>attributed to Ralf Habacker:
> >
> >
> > tsk, tsk:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
XFree86 should be taking care not to steal credit for our patches by
committing them without proper attribution.
your standards are inconsistent: your committing the change rather than
offering commit access to someone who solve
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Your commit didn't mention this either.
Our change log is in our release notes, where the changes were
attributed to Ralf Habacker:
tsk, tsk: the actual comm
On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 11:32, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
>
> > XFree86 should be taking care not to steal credit for our patches by
> > committing them without proper attribution.
>
> your standards are inconsistent: your committing the change rather than
>
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Eric Anholt wrote:
> The only responsible thing for you to do would be to correct the
> ChangeLog to attribute it to the patch's author.
well that's polite enough.
unlike Harold.
no problem.
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
___
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> No, that is not good enough. You should amend your change log entry to
> attribute the patch to Ralf and you should apologize to the X community
> at large for being so sloppy with attributing credit.
yes, you're right. now I'll have to scrutinize
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:02:20PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
>
> > The following CVS commit, made by Thomas Dickey, has no indication that
> > Thomas was either a) not involved at all in the patch or b) that Thomas
> > found Ralf Habacker's patch an
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:02:20PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
The following CVS commit, made by Thomas Dickey, has no indication that
Thomas was either a) not involved at all in the patch or b) that Thomas
found Ralf Habacker's
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Eric Anholt wrote:
The only responsible thing for you to do would be to correct the
ChangeLog to attribute it to the patch's author.
well that's polite enough.
unlike Harold.
I have not been rude in this discussion.
I have repeatedly asked you to attr
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Put Ralf's name in the change log!!!
you first.
Ralf's name is already in our change log, but our change log is not in CVS.
I guess I need to show you that you actively took credit for the patch
again:
The hw/xfree86/CHANGELO
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> If you did get this code directly from Cygwin/X's tree then I'd of
> expected at least the credit to be apportioned to Harold at the very
> least, rather than putting your name against it. Ralf's name could have
> been corrected later, with
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Thomas Dickey wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Eric Anholt wrote:
> >
> >
> >>The only responsible thing for you to do would be to correct the
> >>ChangeLog to attribute it to the patch's author.
> >
> >
> > well that's polite enough.
> > unlike Haro
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Alan Hourihane wrote:
Thomas,
If you did get this code directly from Cygwin/X's tree then I'd of
expected at least the credit to be apportioned to Harold at the very
least, rather than putting your name against it. Ralf's name could have
been corrected
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Eric Anholt wrote:
The only responsible thing for you to do would be to correct the
ChangeLog to attribute it to the patch's author.
well that's polite enough.
unlike Harold.
I have
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
No, that is not good enough. You should amend your change log entry to
attribute the patch to Ralf and you should apologize to the X community
at large for being so sloppy with attributing credit.
yes, you're right.
Thanks.
n
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Eric Anholt wrote:
> I see only minor inconsitency on his part, that the original commit of
> that code didn't attribute it to its author in the CVS logs, while at
> least some other commits do note authors of patches. However, he didn't
> explicitly take credit for it, like
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Put Ralf's name in the change log!!!
you first.
(hmm - that's an appropriate pun).
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> >>been corrected later, with a follow email from Harold.
> >>
> >>It's a simple change to put that right in the CHANGELOG. So I'll do that.
> >
> >
> > I had that on my next set of commits.
>
> Then why not say so earlier?
There was no point in doing
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
a lot of words.
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
been corrected later, with a follow email from Harold.
It's a simple change to put that right in the CHANGELOG. So I'll do that.
I had that on my next set of commits.
Then why not say so earlier?
There was no point in doing s
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
a lot of words.
The modus operandi of Thomas Dickey:
1) Stick head in sand
2) ???
Harold
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Sure there was: you would not have exposed yourself as a hypocrite by
> doing exactly that which you denounce on your home page (pointed out by
> Daniel Armburst). You lambast those "egotistical plagiarists" that
yes, I can imagine that you admire t
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Eric Anholt wrote:
[snip]
announcement of new packages with those changes reflects the author
correctly. I don't see Harold Hunt asking for his name to be on the
patch in any way, only the patch's author's name (the "members of the
Cygwin/X community" i
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 05:34:46PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
>>Sure there was: you would not have exposed yourself as a hypocrite by
>>doing exactly that which you denounce on your home page (pointed out by
>>Daniel Armburst). You lambast those "egot
Thomas, as a casual observer of your behavior in respect to Harold, your last name
would describe you better if it were shortened to "Dick".
Here is a Quote from Mr. Dickeys webpage where he is whining about not getting credit
for patches he wrote:
"This is a collection of some of the patches w
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Armbrust, Daniel C. wrote:
I've seen your postings before, and have no use for your opinions.
(that seems to be a common trait of Harold's friends - I don't have to
address each one of them).
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
David Dawes wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 01:25:52PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
The following CVS commit, made by Thomas Dickey, has no indication that
Thomas was either a) not involved at all in the patch or b) that Thomas
found Ralf Habacker's patch and committed a modified version of th
Wow, your still so pissed off about being wrong, now you are attacking all of Harold's
friends. Boy, you're a big powerful man. Let me bow before you.
#1. I do not know Harold. All I know about him is what I have learned by following
this list for about a year.
#2. I don't know you. All I
I didn't follow all of the discussion and I am not a friend of Harold,
but I would be happy to become his friend in the future. Harold seems to
be a really nice guy spending his free time on the Cygwin X development.
Dickey seems to be a really dick as somebody already noted, or a really
dangerous
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Alec Mihailovs wrote:
> I didn't follow all of the discussion and I am not a friend
> of Harold, but I would be happy to become his friend in the
> future. Harold seems to be a really nice guy spending his
> free time on the Cygwin X development.
Agreed.
> Dickey seems to be
I was going to announce this after Christmas, but maybe today is
better.
I'm proposing to add a Credits section to the Release Notes for
the XFree86 4.4 release. I have a sample/draft at:
http://www.xfree86.org/~dawes/pre-4.4/RELNOTES5.html
Remember this is a sample only, it is intended to gi
On Tuesday 23 December 2003 06:48 PM, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Armbrust, Daniel C. wrote:
>
> I've seen your postings before, and have no use for your opinions.
> (that seems to be a common trait of Harold's friends - I don't have to
> address each one of them).
heh, pointing ou
For the via driver you might also want to put VIA too since they
actually wrote most of the code, Alan just worked it into shape.
Alex
--- David Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was going to announce this after Christmas, but maybe today is
> better.
>
> I'm proposing to add a Credits sectio
43 matches
Mail list logo
