2009/10/7 Davide Bettio :
> DeviceKit-Power documentation seems to be missing.
> Can you publish it?
Ahh, it got deleted after the freedesktop home 'purge'. I've
re-uploaded it here:
http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/DeviceKit-power/
Thanks.
___
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 07:40:48PM -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> For DKD, don't expect a stable API anytime soon. FWIW, I even doubt that
> it's useful to make the API stable. It's kinda-sorta an API that is
> useful only for the OS vendor to implement a desktop environment or an
What OS
Hi,
> Actually it should. It's not really written down anywhere, but a drive
> in DKD terminology is basically something that is a top-level block
> device and has vendor/model/serial metadata.
Please document it.
Anyway I'd like to know if a device is a physical drive (hardisks, cd
drives) or a s
Hi,
I can't understand what PartitionLabel property is meant to be.
Usually labels are stored in the filesystem and moreover the most common
partition table type hasn't got any support for labels.
I suggest you to rename it to Label or to FilesystemLabel.
Bye,
Davide Bettio.
___
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 14:25, Davide Bettio wrote:
> I can't understand what PartitionLabel property is meant to be.
> Usually labels are stored in the filesystem and moreover the most common
> partition table type hasn't got any support for labels.
> I suggest you to rename it to Label or to File
Hi,
> That the old and stupid MSDOS partitions don't support anything useful
>is no reason not to support partition labels. You might want to read:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GUID_Partition_Table#Partition_entries_.28LBA_2.E2.80.9333.29
We can't suppose that the user is using a GUID parti
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 14:46, Davide Bettio wrote:
>> That the old and stupid MSDOS partitions don't support anything useful
>>is no reason not to support partition labels. You might want to read:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GUID_Partition_Table#Partition_entries_.28LBA_2.E2.80.9333.29
>
> We
Hi,
> These values are just not set for MSDOS part tables, because that old
> stuff does not support it. That's how things work. We don't have any
> ext3 specific uuid properties, just because iso9660 does not have
> uuids. Also partition labels have zero in common with filesystem
> labels, they n
Hi,
HAL used to have storage.cdrom.write_speeds, storage.cdrom.write_speed and
storage.cdrom.read_speed.
it seems that DKD doesn't support any of these properties.
Are you going to implement these missing properties?
Bye,
Davide Bettio.
___
devkit-dev
On Wednesday 7 October 2009 02:02:18 Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> Twas brillig at 19:40:48 06.10.2009 UTC-04 when da...@fubar.dk did gyre
> and gimble:
>
> DZ> Applications (that are not disk utility, partitioning etc. apps)
> DZ> should just be using the GIO API since it's simpler and do what
> DZ
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 07:02 +0700, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> Twas brillig at 19:40:48 06.10.2009 UTC-04 when da...@fubar.dk did gyre
> and gimble:
>
> DZ> Applications (that are not disk utility, partitioning etc. apps)
> DZ> should just be using the GIO API since it's simpler and do what
> DZ>
Twas brillig at 12:24:43 07.10.2009 UTC-04 when da...@fubar.dk did gyre
and gimble:
DZ> FWIW, I think our version numbers should probably be changed so it
DZ> is easier for distros to coordinate this effort. E.g. we should
DZ> probably have
DZ> ..
That'd be nice.
DZ> No, it is public ABI
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 14:46 +0200, Davide Bettio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > That the old and stupid MSDOS partitions don't support anything useful
> >is no reason not to support partition labels. You might want to read:
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GUID_Partition_Table#Partition_entries_.28LBA_2
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 23:46 +0700, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> Twas brillig at 12:24:43 07.10.2009 UTC-04 when da...@fubar.dk did gyre
> and gimble:
>
> DZ> FWIW, I think our version numbers should probably be changed so it
> DZ> is easier for distros to coordinate this effort. E.g. we should
> DZ
On Wednesday 7 October 2009 18:46:45 Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> Twas brillig at 12:24:43 07.10.2009 UTC-04 when da...@fubar.dk did gyre
> and gimble:
>
> DZ> FWIW, I think our version numbers should probably be changed so it
> DZ> is easier for distros to coordinate this effort. E.g. we should
>
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 11:32 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 07:40:48PM -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > For DKD, don't expect a stable API anytime soon. FWIW, I even doubt that
> > it's useful to make the API stable. It's kinda-sorta an API that is
> > useful only
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 18:59 +0200, Kévin Ottens wrote:
> On Wednesday 7 October 2009 18:46:45 Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> > Twas brillig at 12:24:43 07.10.2009 UTC-04 when da...@fubar.dk did gyre
> > and gimble:
> >
> > DZ> FWIW, I think our version numbers should probably be changed so it
> > DZ>
On Wednesday 7 October 2009 19:04:26 David Zeuthen wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 18:59 +0200, Kévin Ottens wrote:
> > On Wednesday 7 October 2009 18:46:45 Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> > > Twas brillig at 12:24:43 07.10.2009 UTC-04 when da...@fubar.dk did gyre
> > > and gimble:
> > >
> > > DZ> FWIW, I
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 19:34 +0200, Kévin Ottens wrote:
> Still, I'm surprised that you'd bump it that often. Twice a year seems a lot
> to me.
I just made "twice a year" up because asking users of the ABI to do
something twice a year isn't that unreasonable. If we never made any
mistakes we'd nev
On Wednesday 7 October 2009 20:14:07 David Zeuthen wrote:
> > Yup, having some headups is the minimum. The trouble is more that distros
> > don't transition at the same time, or don't backport my changes to
> > support the latest version, etc. It's real experience I got from HAL and
> > I end up wi
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 12:32:28PM -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
>
> that DeviceKit-disks is a distro-neutral interface where the obvious
> users are things like GNOME Disk Utility, the GNOME desktop shell (e.g.
> Nautilus) and in the future things like OS installers (which may or may
> not be distr
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 07:24:08AM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 11:47 +0200, gibbo...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > ** What I want : **
> > I want the ability for a simple user to set ANY action
> > automatically done according to device events ...
> > with the "state-of-art"
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:18:37AM +0200, gibbo...@gmail.com wrote:
> $ devkit-disks --show-info /dev/sda7
> devkit-disks-daemon throws :
>
> ** (devkit-disks-daemon:9668): WARNING **: introspection data references
> non-existing property NativePath
> [ ... same message for each property follow .
23 matches
Mail list logo
