Re: dip1000 state

2018-03-03 Thread carblue via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 3 March 2018 at 02:12:28 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 3/2/2018 10:07 AM, carblue wrote: I generally already used -dip1000 since DConf2017 and it served me well, until about 2 month ago, "by accident" code was committed to std.uni that broke my builds, see issue #17961. I invested

Re: dip1000 state

2018-03-02 Thread carblue via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 18:17:02 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi wrote: On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 18:07:34 UTC, carblue wrote: (It may be absolutely unrelated, but there once was a very productive and knowledgeable compiler et. al. contributor, 9rnsr, Hara Kenji; though not contributing to dmd since

Re: dip1000 state

2018-03-02 Thread carblue via Digitalmars-d
On Thursday, 22 February 2018 at 14:36:10 UTC, Radu wrote: Whould like to know what's the state of dip1000? The fact that it takes 8 days for any reply, doesn't that say something? @safe is a high ranked technical issue in vision papers (in german we say something like "paper is patient"), bu