Re: gdc is in

2017-10-08 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
On 10/8/17 10:38 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote: On 7 October 2017 at 19:42, Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Friday, 6 October 2017 at 15:21:05 UTC, jmh530 wrote: I would think this would be bigger news...I mean LDC isn't even on 2.076 yet... I very much so agree. This is fantastic news! Are t

Re: gdc is in

2017-10-08 Thread Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d
On Sunday, 8 October 2017 at 19:30:48 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: On 10/08/2017 10:49 AM, Jack Applegame wrote: On Sunday, 8 October 2017 at 08:38:15 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: Donating for the upkeep of our infrastructure is also welcome. ;-) How to do this? You can donate to the foundation: h

Re: gdc is in

2017-10-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp via Digitalmars-d
I've had to add more swap because CI builds for mips, ppc and sparc started failing due to hitting the oomkiller. Donating for the upkeep of our infrastructure is also welcome. ;-) This might be worthwhile. It is highly likely that when GDC is in GCC it will become the default D comp

Re: gdc is in

2017-10-08 Thread Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d
On 10/08/2017 10:49 AM, Jack Applegame wrote: On Sunday, 8 October 2017 at 08:38:15 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: Donating for the upkeep of our infrastructure is also welcome. ;-) How to do this? You can donate to the foundation: https://dlang.org/foundation.html This is the donation page:

Re: gdc is in

2017-10-08 Thread Jack Applegame via Digitalmars-d
On Sunday, 8 October 2017 at 08:38:15 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: Donating for the upkeep of our infrastructure is also welcome. ;-) How to do this?

Re: gdc is in

2017-10-08 Thread Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
On 7 October 2017 at 19:42, Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Friday, 6 October 2017 at 15:21:05 UTC, jmh530 wrote: >> >> I would think this would be bigger news...I mean LDC isn't even on 2.076 >> yet... > > > I very much so agree. This is fantastic news! > > Are there any beta (alpha|beta|rc

Re: gdc is in

2017-10-07 Thread Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
On 7 October 2017 at 20:31, jmh530 via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Saturday, 7 October 2017 at 17:15:13 UTC, Joakim wrote: >> >> >> Most people don't follow gdc development closely. If you say that there's >> a newer version available and you'd like help packaging it, someone might >> step up. Aft

Re: gdc is in

2017-10-07 Thread jmh530 via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 7 October 2017 at 17:15:13 UTC, Joakim wrote: Most people don't follow gdc development closely. If you say that there's a newer version available and you'd like help packaging it, someone might step up. After all, it's much easier to package the compiler than to keep it up to d

Re: gdc is in

2017-10-07 Thread Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 6 October 2017 at 15:21:05 UTC, jmh530 wrote: I would think this would be bigger news...I mean LDC isn't even on 2.076 yet... I very much so agree. This is fantastic news! Are there any beta (alpha|beta|rc)-builds available for download?

Re: gdc is in

2017-10-07 Thread John Colvin via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 7 October 2017 at 16:46:44 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: On 7 October 2017 at 15:00, jmh530 via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Saturday, 7 October 2017 at 10:24:38 UTC, Joakim wrote: [...] Also, maybe it will be easier to get people to help him if they know that it's up-to-date. Why woul

Re: gdc is in

2017-10-07 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 7 October 2017 at 16:46:44 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: On 7 October 2017 at 15:00, jmh530 via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Saturday, 7 October 2017 at 10:24:38 UTC, Joakim wrote: I understand that you've been very busy with getting gdc into gcc and that there's not much manpower helping

Re: gdc is in

2017-10-07 Thread Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
On 7 October 2017 at 15:00, jmh530 via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Saturday, 7 October 2017 at 10:24:38 UTC, Joakim wrote: >> >> >> I understand that you've been very busy with getting gdc into gcc and that >> there's not much manpower helping you out, but we're suggesting that you >> release a bina

Re: gdc is in

2017-10-07 Thread jmh530 via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 7 October 2017 at 10:24:38 UTC, Joakim wrote: I understand that you've been very busy with getting gdc into gcc and that there's not much manpower helping you out, but we're suggesting that you release a binary, even if just a beta like ldc does, and announce it to help change th

Re: gdc is in

2017-10-07 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 7 October 2017 at 09:54:41 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: On 7 October 2017 at 04:46, Joakim via Digitalmars-d wrote: Yes, the gdc downloads page hasn't been updated in 9 months: https://gdcproject.org/downloads By comparison, ldc is at the ddmd 2.074 frontend, which has been downloa

Re: gdc is in

2017-10-07 Thread Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
On 7 October 2017 at 04:46, Joakim via Digitalmars-d wrote: > > > Yes, the gdc downloads page hasn't been updated in 9 months: > > https://gdcproject.org/downloads > > By comparison, ldc is at the ddmd 2.074 frontend, which has been downloaded > 7000 times in the last month since it was released:

Re: gdc is in

2017-10-06 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 6 October 2017 at 20:34:20 UTC, John Colvin wrote: On Friday, 6 October 2017 at 17:04:39 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: On 6 October 2017 at 17:21, jmh530 via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Friday, 6 October 2017 at 15:04:25 UTC, Joakim wrote: I assume you mean ddmd and static foreach, the mai

Re: gdc is in

2017-10-06 Thread Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
On 6 October 2017 at 22:34, John Colvin via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Friday, 6 October 2017 at 17:04:39 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> >> On 6 October 2017 at 17:21, jmh530 via Digitalmars-d >> wrote: >>> >>> On Friday, 6 October 2017 at 15:04:25 UTC, Joakim wrote: I assume you m

Re: gdc is in

2017-10-06 Thread John Colvin via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 6 October 2017 at 17:04:39 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: On 6 October 2017 at 17:21, jmh530 via Digitalmars-d wrote: On Friday, 6 October 2017 at 15:04:25 UTC, Joakim wrote: I assume you mean ddmd and static foreach, the mailing list post linked from my link implies it includes both.

Re: gdc is in

2017-10-06 Thread jmh530 via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 6 October 2017 at 17:04:39 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: Really? Well, maintenance should be rather small now that the patch / diff is relatively tiny for GDC. Rebasing only against dmd/stable branch on a weekly basis or so should help things along also. As long as I've been followi

Re: gdc is in

2017-10-06 Thread Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
On 6 October 2017 at 17:21, jmh530 via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Friday, 6 October 2017 at 15:04:25 UTC, Joakim wrote: >> >> >> I assume you mean ddmd and static foreach, the mailing list post linked >> from my link implies it includes both. > > > I would think this would be bigger news...I mean L

Re: gdc is in

2017-10-06 Thread jmh530 via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 6 October 2017 at 15:04:25 UTC, Joakim wrote: I assume you mean ddmd and static foreach, the mailing list post linked from my link implies it includes both. I would think this would be bigger news...I mean LDC isn't even on 2.076 yet...

Re: gdc is in

2017-10-06 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 4 October 2017 at 05:56:41 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote: On Tuesday, 3 October 2017 at 22:00:51 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote: the gcc tree: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :) I f

Re: gdc is in

2017-10-04 Thread Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d
GCC 8 Dne 4. 10. 2017 8:10 dopoledne napsal uživatel "Suliman via Digitalmars-d" < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com>: > On Tuesday, 3 October 2017 at 22:00:51 UTC, Joakim wrote: > >> On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote: >> >>> the gcc tree: >>> >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-

Re: gdc is in

2017-10-03 Thread Suliman via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 3 October 2017 at 22:00:51 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote: the gcc tree: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :) I found out because it's on the front page of HN right now, where co

Re: gdc is in

2017-10-03 Thread Per Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d
On Tuesday, 3 October 2017 at 22:00:51 UTC, Joakim wrote: On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote: the gcc tree: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :) I found out because it's on the front page of HN right now, where co

Re: gdc is in

2017-10-03 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote: the gcc tree: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :) I found out because it's on the front page of HN right now, where commenters are asking questions about D. An update, includi

Re: gdc is in

2017-07-06 Thread Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d
Am Wed, 21 Jun 2017 15:11:39 + schrieb Joakim : > the gcc tree: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html > > Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :) > > I found out because it's on the front page of HN right now, where > commenters are asking questions about D. I missed t

Re: gdc is in

2017-06-24 Thread Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote: the gcc tree: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :) I found out because it's on the front page of HN right now, where commenters are asking questions about D. Thanks for all the

Re: gdc is in

2017-06-22 Thread Antonio Corbi via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote: the gcc tree: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :) I found out because it's on the front page of HN right now, where commenters are asking questions about D. Congrats Iain! It'

Re: gdc is in

2017-06-22 Thread Johannes Loher via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote: the gcc tree: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :) I found out because it's on the front page of HN right now, where commenters are asking questions about D. This is really gre

Re: gdc is in

2017-06-21 Thread Johan Engelen via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote: the gcc tree: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :) Congratulations! Great achievement. - Johan

Re: gdc is in

2017-06-21 Thread ANtlord via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote: the gcc tree: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :) I join in the congratulations. Iain, you rock!

Re: gdc is in

2017-06-21 Thread Jonathan Marler via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote: the gcc tree: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :) I found out because it's on the front page of HN right now, where commenters are asking questions about D. Terrific news, con

Re: gdc is in

2017-06-21 Thread Wulfklaue via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote: the gcc tree: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :) Nice job Iain ... Especially after 6 years pushing for it and the whole rewrite.

Re: gdc is in

2017-06-21 Thread Eugene Wissner via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote: the gcc tree: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :) I found out because it's on the front page of HN right now, where commenters are asking questions about D. Many thanks and co

Re: gdc is in

2017-06-21 Thread Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
On 6/21/2017 8:11 AM, Joakim wrote: the gcc tree: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :) I found out because it's on the front page of HN right now, where commenters are asking questions about D. Pretty dazz! Made my week!

Re: gdc is in

2017-06-21 Thread Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote: the gcc tree: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :) I found out because it's on the front page of HN right now, where commenters are asking questions about D. As already mention

Re: gdc is in

2017-06-21 Thread kinke via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote: Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :) +1. Awesome!

Re: gdc is in

2017-06-21 Thread Meta via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote: the gcc tree: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :) I found out because it's on the front page of HN right now, where commenters are asking questions about D. Congratulations in

Re: gdc is in

2017-06-21 Thread Johannes Pfau via Digitalmars-d
Am Wed, 21 Jun 2017 15:44:08 + schrieb Nordlöw : > On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote: > > the gcc tree: > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html > > > > Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :) > > > > I found out because it's on the front page of HN

Re: gdc is in

2017-06-21 Thread Johannes Pfau via Digitalmars-d
Am Wed, 21 Jun 2017 15:11:39 + schrieb Joakim : > the gcc tree: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html > > Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :) > > I found out because it's on the front page of HN right now, where > commenters are asking questions about D. Awesome! A

Re: gdc is in

2017-06-21 Thread Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote: Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :) BTW: Thanks, Ian!

Re: gdc is in

2017-06-21 Thread Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote: the gcc tree: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :) I found out because it's on the front page of HN right now, where commenters are asking questions about D. Which frontend ver

Re: gdc is in

2017-06-21 Thread Kapps via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote: the gcc tree: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :) I found out because it's on the front page of HN right now, where commenters are asking questions about D. Awesome, congratul

Re: gdc is in

2017-06-21 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 15:11:39 UTC, Joakim wrote: the gcc tree: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :) I found out because it's on the front page of HN right now, where commenters are asking questions about D. It's on reddit, to

gdc is in

2017-06-21 Thread Joakim via Digitalmars-d
the gcc tree: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-06/msg00111.html Congratulations to Iain and the gdc team. :) I found out because it's on the front page of HN right now, where commenters are asking questions about D.