On 1/30/19 10:03 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Thursday, 31 January 2019 at 02:29:47 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I came up with this idea based on tempCString, but it doesn't work:
So I don't get why it doesn't work. But if that was fixed, could be a
potential workaround without requiring
On Thursday, 31 January 2019 at 02:29:47 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
I came up with this idea based on tempCString, but it doesn't
work:
So I don't get why it doesn't work. But if that was fixed,
could be a potential workaround without requiring a DIP.
Thats nice! But it doesn't fix the
On 1/30/19 9:20 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Essentially, nothing is different from existing semantics today, when
rvalues are used and provides reference semantics (yes, it's possible,
see tempCString). They live until the end of the statement. It's how
this has to be. It can't be expressi
On 1/29/19 6:52 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
While writing this example:
int[] a = cast(int[]) alloc.allocate(100 * int.sizeof);
if (alloc.reallocate(a, 200 * int.sizeof))
{
assert(a.length == 200);
}
=>
int[] a = cast(int[]) alloc.allocate(100 * int.sizeof);
void[] __temp0 = a;
if
On 1/30/19 3:34 AM, Kagamin wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 January 2019 at 11:52:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Where should the temporary go?
Doesn't D already specify allocation and lifetime of temporaries? AIU
the DIP doesn't invent the notion of a temporary.
My bad, I overloaded the term "te
On Tuesday, 29 January 2019 at 11:52:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Where should the temporary go?
Doesn't D already specify allocation and lifetime of temporaries?
AIU the DIP doesn't invent the notion of a temporary.
On Tuesday, 29 January 2019 at 15:44:02 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 January 2019 at 11:52:40 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
While writing this example:
int[] a = cast(int[]) alloc.allocate(100 * int.sizeof);
if (alloc.reallocate(a, 200 * int.sizeof))
{
assert(a.length == 200
On 1/29/19 10:57 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 January 2019 at 15:48:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/29/19 10:44 AM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
if (auto val = expr(); val) { ... },
Since we don't have these constructs, lowering would need to explain
what happens here.
Nitp
On Tuesday, 29 January 2019 at 15:48:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/29/19 10:44 AM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
if (auto val = expr(); val) { ... },
Since we don't have these constructs, lowering would need to
explain what happens here.
Nitpick, but D has something very similar to th
On 1/29/19 10:44 AM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 January 2019 at 11:52:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
While writing this example:
int[] a = cast(int[]) alloc.allocate(100 * int.sizeof);
if (alloc.reallocate(a, 200 * int.sizeof))
{
assert(a.length == 200);
}
=>
int[] a =
On Tuesday, 29 January 2019 at 11:52:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
While writing this example:
int[] a = cast(int[]) alloc.allocate(100 * int.sizeof);
if (alloc.reallocate(a, 200 * int.sizeof))
{
assert(a.length == 200);
}
=>
int[] a = cast(int[]) alloc.allocate(100 * int.sizeof);
11 matches
Mail list logo
