Re: [digitalradio] ANNOUNCE: PocketDigi 1.0.11 released

Good job Vojtech! I don't have a Windows CE machine but I have the i386 version of PocketDigi on my Win2K system and it works very nicely. The RS ID feature, by being incorporated in other software besides MultiPSK, may be one of the best things 2008 will bring. 73 Sholto KE7HPV.

[digitalradio] I'm a new guy

Well at least relatively new. I've been a general since last February, but was operating HF as an Army MARS operator for about 2 years before my upgrade. I signed up here because I've discovered I have a bunch I want to learn about digital modes. I hope this is the right place. My experience so fa

Re: [digitalradio] A weekend of NBEMS: Some questions.

> > 1. Did anyone use it on VHF or UHF this weekend ? It seems that it > would be perfect for these quiet frequency ranges, file transfers at > PSK250 should really be very useful It is designed primarily for VHF in the choice of modes, narrow bandwidth and not handling much QSB so no need fo

[digitalradio] NBEMS experience today

Several of us were around the 10137 frequency earlier today and tried various combinations of modes, including NBEMS. We had at least KH6TY, K3UK, VE5MU, KC7GNM, and WD4KPD. Some attempts at making transfers was done. I sent Skip one of my standard messages which is the Gettysburgh Address. It

[digitalradio] ANNOUNCE: PocketDigi 1.0.11 released

Hi gang. I released PocketDigi 1.0.11 at http://pocketdigi.sourceforge.net. There are following new features implemented: RSID, PSK63F, PSK125, sampling rate conversion, tx delay/tx tail/ats3 preamble/postamble settings, keyboard accelerators, Handheld PC 2000 improvements, Waterfall FFT optimi

[digitalradio] Re: Mode identification

Yes. A radio. No re sparkI even hear CW from time to time! 73, Bill N9DSJ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "jhaynesatalumni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Bill McLaughlin" wrote: > > One I had trouble with the other day, was > > Clover, but had not

[digitalradio] A weekend of NBEMS: Some questions.

So, I had a weekend of playing around with the version of NBEMS that works under Windows (VBdigi and FLARQ 2.6). The feedback from others seems to be that the ARQ file and email transfers seem to work as advertised. There are a few questions about this software package: 1. Did anyone use it on

[digitalradio] Clarification on Winlink

Winlink was a system that used MBOs (Mail Box Operations) around the world that you could connect to with Pactor and Clover II, to send mail to other hams. It was also tied in to the VHF packet structure at one time. The owners then developed an internet based system called Winlink 2000, which

[digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

My attempt at installation failed with NOTE: Now spawning the main Setup program 'Setup1.exe' *** ERROR: Cannot start main setup program! (CreateProcess() returned error code 0x0005H) Did you customize Setup1? Suggestions? 73, Dave, AA6YQ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

Yes, Skip. My bad. You are correct except for the "." at the end of the link Sorry for the qrm... that is little QRM, like psk31 is 73 Chuck AA5J > > > > At 01:02 PM 1/6/2008, Nick wrote: > > > >>Hello Haward, > >> > >>Happy New Year! > >> > >>Sorry, > <http://www.

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

Should be http://www.w1hkj.com/NBEMS. The k and h were transposed. Skip KH6TY - Original Message - From: "Chuck Mayfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 6:38 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M > Try: http://www.w1khj.com/NBEMS > > CHUCK AA5J >

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

Try: http://www.w1khj.com/NBEMS CHUCK AA5J At 01:02 PM 1/6/2008, Nick wrote: >Hello Haward, > >Happy New Year! > >Sorry, http://www.w1khj/NBEMS is not a working link. > >"Server not found >Firefox can't find the server at www.w1khj.com " > >73! > >Sunday, January 06, 200

Re: [digitalradio] 160M PSK activity?

There was some last night on 1807-1810 On Jan 6, 2008 6:26 PM, Gary - N3JPU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Been trolling the low end of 160M for a while, is there any PSK users on > 160M? > > Gary Mitchelson > N3JPU Montgomery Co. MD FM19 > http://www.mitchelson.org/ > > -- An

[digitalradio] 160M PSK activity?

Been trolling the low end of 160M for a while, is there any PSK users on 160M? Gary Mitchelson N3JPU Montgomery Co. MD FM19 http://www.mitchelson.org/

RE: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

In my experience, most users of digital modes beyond RTTY and PSK-31 stay up-to-date with whatever software they are using because 1. they need the defect repairs 2. they want the new features and modes Using CW (or any other "universal mode") for identification does not require registration or

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

Hi Jackboth multipsk and fldigi have a feature where you can monitor your transmit signal..one way to learn what they look like is to turn the feature on and the try transmitting the various modes and learn to see what they look like. there is more than one way of killing the cat as

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

At 08:33 AM 1/7/2008, you wrote: >Hi Dave CW id is not universally understood..i for one have >a hearing problem and CW is very difficult for me to hear let alone >decode...also what about those who are deaf...we do have a number of >them around the world... most are now using digital

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

Dave AA6YQ wrote: IDing in CW has the benefits that its universally understood, requires no decoding software, and is trivial to implement. 73, Dave, AA6YQ -Original Message- *From:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of *Jack Chomley *Sent

RE: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

At 08:18 AM 1/7/2008, you wrote: IDing in CW has the benefits that its universally understood, requires no decoding software, and is trivial to implement. 73, Dave, AA6YQ OK, ask ALL software developers to bury that function in their program.so it can't be switched OFF and

RE: [digitalradio] DXKeeper APP_DXKEEPER_SUBMODE field

There's no rule proposed, Patrick; I think of it as a mode-specific comment. 73, Dave, AA6YQ -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 4:54 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sub

[digitalradio] Re: Mode identification

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Bill McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One I had trouble with the other day, was > Clover, but had not heard it in so long I had forgotten what it > sounded like. > You heard a Clover signal?! What kind of time machine do you have there? Heard any sp

RE: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

IDing in CW has the benefits that its universally understood, requires no decoding software, and is trivial to implement. 73, Dave, AA6YQ -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jack Chomley Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 3:28

[digitalradio] DXKeeper APP_DXKEEPER_SUBMODE field

Hello Dave, >Patrick, the newest version of DXKeeper provides a sub-mode field; >it'd be nice if MultiPSK would log things like the Olivia tone >constellation there: APP_DXKEEPER_SUBMODE. Perhaps Simon and I can >convince the ADIF development community to make this a standard field. Yes it woul

[digitalradio] Updated NBEMS files avialble

http://w1hkj.com/NBEMS/

[digitalradio] Updated NBEMS files avialble

http://w1hkj.com/NBEMS/

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

Jack Chomley wrote: At 04:57 AM 1/7/2008, Rick wrote: >I sure wish more hams would work on solving this problem, rather than >exacerbating the situation and being part of the problem. > >Just a few minutes ago I was trying to have a Q with VE5MU using FAE 400 >around 10137. A Pactor station sta

[digitalradio] Re: Mode identification

Understood; RS ID "tells" the other station the mode and frequency. I think you are correct in that analysis of a signal is difficult. Some modes are very easy to recognize by ear (Throb, for example), others are much more difficult. One I had trouble with the other day, was Clover, but had not hea

[digitalradio] Mode identification

Yes, but the RS ID signal has to be transmitted. I believe that Jack refers to some thing like a function PK-232's had to analyze and identify the mode. Something could be done using MultiPSK Analysis function. But for an example, today I attempted to decode a signal tha APPARENTLY was PSK250

[digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

Hello Jack, In MultiPSK, the "RS ID" provides this function...automatically changes mode and frequency also, when implemented. Not sure of any other software that uses this function but it works very well and can decode mode and center frequency fairly deep into the noise. 73, Bill --- In digit

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

At 04:57 AM 1/7/2008, Rick wrote: >I sure wish more hams would work on solving this problem, rather than >exacerbating the situation and being part of the problem. > >Just a few minutes ago I was trying to have a Q with VE5MU using FAE 400 >around 10137. A Pactor station starting transmitting righ

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

Rick wrote: > > I sure wish more hams would work on solving this problem, rather than > exacerbating the situation and being part of the problem. > > Just a few minutes ago I was trying to have a Q with VE5MU using FAE > 400 around 10137. A Pactor station starting transmitting right over > our

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

It is getting a bit crazy on 30m. I have been seeing a lot of Winlink QRM lately. If anyone doubts this, put your receiver on 10.140 USB and watch the PSK31 QSOs for a while. You can guarantee you won't have to wait very long before some Pactor station & Winlink server switch to Pactor-3 and cover

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

I sure wish more hams would work on solving this problem, rather than exacerbating the situation and being part of the problem. Just a few minutes ago I was trying to have a Q with VE5MU using FAE 400 around 10137. A Pactor station starting transmitting right over our frequency. It is really u

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

Andy, It is an honest attempt to work together to resolve a continuing problem. WG3G has been off the air for months, I believe, so the question is why is his transmitter automatically trying to connect with WG3G. I'll bet he doesn't even know it. Wouldn't you like to know? WG3G is in Trinidad

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

Skip, you don't really mean that! Any witches to burn.. thieves to cut the hands off.. I'll go now and monitor the bands.. woe betide I find a NBEMS signal that interferes another signal.. Andy, DF4WC Original-Nachricht > Datum: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 12:50:52 -0500 > Von: "kh6ty" <

Moderator : Re: [digitalradio] Re: Beacon's ?

Please refrain from generalized statements about professions that one does not like. They can be construed as personal attacks. Andy K3UK On Jan 6, 2008 1:57 AM, Demetre SV1UY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Roger J. Buffington" > > <[EMAIL PROTE