David wrote:
> Hi All..as this petition only has to do with Hams in the USA i would
> suggest that argument from both sides be taken to a group especially for
> the subject and not be put on the other many Hams outside the
> USA.this petition has already engendered some very bad slanging
>
able. For this, I am very opposed as being not in
the spirit of ham radio.
Michael
_
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 7:13 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] FCC: &q
Michael,
I was initially licensed in 1963. There were many fewer hams here in the
U.S. back then I can assure you. Many fewer. I would not take the
position that we are going to have fewer hams worldwide either. So your
claim may be misplaced.
You are correct that CW has declined as a casual m
I too, agree with the petition! There NEEDS to be some reining back of some,
if not A LOT of the HF, as well as VHF & UHF band operators!
I'm NOT a fan of Internet Radio (IRLP or Echolink). Internet is NOT Radio!
A LOT of these IRLP and Echo link nodes are oblivious to the fact that ther
adio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] FCC: "Petition to Kill Digital Advancement"
Read the "Petition to Kill Ham Radio Digital Advancements"
click here:
http://hflink. <http://hflink.com/fcc/FCC_RM11392.pdf>
com/fcc/FCC_RM11392.pdf
File your comments against &qu
Hi All..as this petition only has to do with Hams in the USA i would
suggest that argument from both sides be taken to a group especially for
the subject and not be put on the other many Hams outside the
USA.this petition has already engendered some very bad slanging
between the 2 opposing
ateurs.
Barry VE3CDX/W7
_
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of expeditionradio
Sent: Tuesday, December 25, 2007 10:57 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] FCC: "Petition to Kill Digital Advancement"
Read the "Petitio
- Original Message -
From: "W2XJ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I will be responding in support of the petition. I do not believe these
> digital modes will be effective in a true national emergency. I do
> believe that they use a disproportionate amount of bandwidth for no real
> advantage. Emai
I will be responding in support of the petition. I do not believe these
digital modes will be effective in a true national emergency. I do
believe that they use a disproportionate amount of bandwidth for no real
advantage. Email at less than 2400 baud is not cutting edge technology.
In a real n
Read the "Petition to Kill Ham Radio Digital Advancements"
click here:
http://hflink.com/fcc/FCC_RM11392.pdf
File your comments against "proceeding RM-11392"
click here:
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi
Can we can get at least one hundred hams to oppose it?
Please do your part.
10 matches
Mail list logo
