D] On
Behalf Of David
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 1:10 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] JT65A reports
Barry Garratt wrote:
Hi Dave,
Actually what you describe is EME reports as opposed to Terrestrial reports.
The OOO and RO are used for EME but are als
Hey Barry, Happy New Year..
Where are you camped out now?
Not much new here, still sticking in TXs and stuff like that with Paul PQ...
Will be in AZ next month I think..
Len
:* [digitalradio] JT65A reports
There seems to be a difference btween reporting systems between the US
system and the European system on terrestrial JT65A contacts.
Can anyone explain to me when a contact is 'valid' between two stations
using the two different systems please?
For example, I re
/W7
_
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 9:24 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] JT65A reports
There seems to be a difference btween reporting systems between the US
system
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That was it, no report, not even "OOO"s. I was using what, in the
> guide, says is the European standard of sending the received dB signal
> strength, but the EA station was using the US version, appart from no "OOO".
>
>
Sorry, my mistake, I missread the guide. Se
There seems to be a difference btween reporting systems between the US
system and the European system on terrestrial JT65A contacts.
Can anyone explain to me when a contact is 'valid' between two stations
using the two different systems please?
For example, I received the following today (calls