>
> There is so much work involved in writing a fool-proof program with a good
> user interface that having to also write the encoding / decoding interface
> would make sure projects unfeasible for a single programmer who codes in his
> spare time.
>
> Simon HB9DRV
>
>
I can second that :)
- Original Message -
From: "f6cte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> However, you can directly use the code without understand it but it is
> not the way I do because it is without interest.
One main reason why PSK became so popular was that source code was made
available early on. Many have implem
Hello Demetre and all,
> writers who although they allow everyone to use their program, they
> keep their code to themselves. Of course it is everyone's right to
> protect their code and I do not blame anyone here, I am just stating a
> fact.
As I belong to this category (Multipsk author), here i
single packet transmission was received without noise.
Of course this is Pactor 1 only.
Howard K5HB
- Original Message
From: Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 10:04:45 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Licens
Do you really know if Pactor was licensed to others? If SCS actually
fully licensed the mode, it would seem to me that they would insure that
the memory ARQ would have been included. Only the SCS modems seemed to
have this feature. That is why they worked better between SCS modems
than between