Re: [digitalradio] New Digital Mode Winmor

2008-08-27 Thread Alan Barrow
Hello all, For the curious the winlink web site has a snapshot of the program running: < http://www.winlink.org/node/341 > There are other tidbits that have surfaced in the winlink forums Very little hard data has surfaced, just some tidbits in the winlink forums. Based on past comments, I

Re: [digitalradio] New Digital Mode Winmor

2008-08-27 Thread Don Rand
Andy, I may have misread something in the original notice. That being the "proceedings" of TAPR DC will be offered for sale by ARRL. I don't remember a mention that the software would be for sale. Been completely wrong before (and often). Don KA5DON Steinar, I do not know the individua

Re: [digitalradio] New Digital Mode Winmor

2008-08-27 Thread Andrew O'Brien
Steinar, I do not know the individuals concerned, they are probably good hams. The undercurrent however, is the view of some, that the SCAMP, WINLINK, AIRMAIL , TELPAC, system is not as "open" as radio amateurs usually desire. When when one contrasts the openness of PSK31, MMTTY, NEMBS, MT63,

Re: [digitalradio] New Digital Mode Winmor

2008-08-27 Thread Steinar Aanesland
What is the connection to the Winmor protocol here?? 73 de LA5VNA Steinar Charles Brabham wrote: > The article mentions WinLink developer Rick Muething. > > Rick Muething installed the WinLink HF and VHF stuff in our area. > > That was when we first noticed the new "packet node" with no call

Re: [digitalradio] New Digital Mode Winmor

2008-08-27 Thread Charles Brabham
The article mentions WinLink developer Rick Muething. Rick Muething installed the WinLink HF and VHF stuff in our area. That was when we first noticed the new "packet node" with no callsign and the alias "OFF". - Illegal as you can get. The "OFF" node cleverly screws up TheNet nodes so that th

RE: [digitalradio] New Digital Mode Winmor

2008-08-26 Thread Rud Merriam
age- > From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of "John > Becker, WØJAB" > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 6:25 PM > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New Digital Mode Winmor > > > Licensing

Re: [digitalradio] New Digital Mode Winmor

2008-08-26 Thread John Becker, WØJAB
Licensing helps pay for all that R&D (research and development) that could very well run into the millions. doing otherwise would not be good for any business. At 12:37 PM 8/26/2008, you wrote: >I really hope the code or at least a DLL is made available. Anything to get >rid of PACTOR III has my

Re: [digitalradio] New Digital Mode Winmor

2008-08-26 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I agree with Simon. The questions is HOW MUCH will it cost ? On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Simon Brown (KNS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I really hope the code or at least a DLL is made available. Anything to get > rid of PACTOR III has my vote (I do not like the licencing issues inv

Re: [digitalradio] New Digital Mode Winmor

2008-08-26 Thread Simon Brown (KNS)
I really hope the code or at least a DLL is made available. Anything to get rid of PACTOR III has my vote (I do not like the licencing issues involved). Simon Brown, HB9DRV www.ham-radio-deluxe.com - Original Message - From: "Bob Donnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Looks interesting. I wo

RE: [digitalradio] New Digital Mode Winmor

2008-08-26 Thread Bob Donnell
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Maguire Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 9:05 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: [digitalradio] New Digital Mode Winmor http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2008/08/26/10284/?nc=1

[digitalradio] New Digital Mode Winmor

2008-08-26 Thread Jon Maguire
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2008/08/26/10284/?nc=1