Aw, pshaw. I am sorry that I hurt your delicate sensitivities,
Bill. Get over it. All this political and administrative bs has
absolutely nothing to do with digitalradio. It is one clique
fighting with another clique. One group is asking for clarification
about the other group's operation.
Jim,
At 03:28 PM 1/13/2008, jgorman01 wrote:
>A couple of answers. One, is that as a service we are self-policing.
>I think if you read the original document establishing this, it
>didn't mean that each individual polices himself but rather that the
>service as a whole polices itself routing out o
Ok, I admit it, I mandated Rick to ask questions.
But seriously, why the concern about asking for clarification? And
yes, it does seem personal.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Chuck Mayfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> At 09:57 AM 1/13/2008, Rick wrote:
> >My preference
A couple of answers. One, is that as a service we are self-policing.
I think if you read the original document establishing this, it
didn't mean that each individual polices himself but rather that the
service as a whole polices itself routing out operations that don't
follow the rules. Part of
