h each other and tolerate those who
are into different facets of this great hobby.
Jim - K6JM
- Original Message -
From: "John Becker, WØJAB"
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 2:17 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Why does the ARRL c
Sorry to both of you.
In the last week my mind has been elsewhere after my check up with
my cancer doctor. Really need testing to be sure but right now he
thinks that it may have return. But to answer both. No it is not needed.
And if I may add that I only use it when connected to a BBS. Makes t
John, I asked you the same question, but you did not answer mine. :-(
Just as I thought, the only reason to allow Pactor-III on 60m is for
Winlink's benefit. Let's file comments to the FCC to allow any modes 500
Hz wide or less so at least 4 or 5 stations can use the channel for QSO
and Emcomm
At 06:27 PM 5/10/2010, you wrote:
>Another question was whether Pactor III's bandwidth was really necessary for
>live keyboard to keyboard QSOs. I guess that was an anti-Pactor III question,
>but that one also never got answered.
Jim to answer that I really would have to say that
for keyboard
On May 10, 2010, at 7:26 PM, Chris Jewell wrote:
> Rick Ellison writes:
> "recommending that instead of authorizing only PSK-31 and Pactor-III,
> that the FCC instead permit all publicly-documented data modes "
>
>
So, has Pactor III every been publicly-documented???
Dave
K3DCW
Real radio b
is a renewed interest among military,
agency and NGOs), it is nice to have a dog in the hunt." That may help explain
the ARRL's action, I guess.
Jim - K6JM
- Original Message -
From: "John Becker, WØJAB"
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, Ma
Rick Ellison writes:
...
> This just makes no sense to me why you would push Pactor III on a
> channelized frequency setting..
A good question: I was thinking of sending in a comment on that NPRM,
recommending that instead of authorizing only PSK-31 and Pactor-III,
that the FCC instead permit a
d or recive any messages.I type about 65
wpm. Any advice or instruction as what I should do.I have run out of things to
try.Thanks Hugh kd4txp.73
From: KH6TY
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, May 10, 2010 3:19:58 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Why does th
ohn Becker, WØJAB""
To:
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 12:49 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Why does the ARRL continue to push for Pactor
III support...
>I can clearly see that this anti Pactor rant will Never end.
>
> John, W0JAB
>
>
I don't know Skip.
Tell us. You seem to have an answer for everything and everyone.
after thinking about that, don't tell us.
I really don't care what you are others think about pactor.
I like it and will operate it.
John, W0JAB
> ESP - There is a difference between typing and "touch" typing. Google it.
I did. "Touch typing is typing without using the sense of sight to find
the keys."
*"Typing* is the process of inputting text into a device, such as a
typewriter , cell phone , computer
, or a calculator , by pressin
At 03:12 PM 5/10/2010, you wrote:
>John,
>
>I was specifically asking only about Pactor-III keyboard-to-keyboard QSO's,
>not Pactor-II or Pactor I.
Skip, just because you are anyone else "can't" copy
P2 or P3 does not mean it does not happen. Belive me, it happens !
most of my keyboard to keyb
John,
I was specifically asking only about Pactor-III keyboard-to-keyboard
QSO's, not Pactor-II or Pactor I.
> As for a typing. touch typing is a thing of the past.
How do you personally carry on a keyboard-to-keyboard conversation
without typing?
73 - Skip KH6TY
John Becker, WØJAB wrot
Often, very often. All pactor modes.
As for a typing. touch typing is a thing of the past.
At 02:19 PM 5/10/2010, you wrote:
>John,
>
>How frequently do you use Pactor-III, keyboard to keyboard?
>
>How fast do you touch type?
John,
How frequently do you use Pactor-III, keyboard to keyboard?
How fast do you touch type?
73 - Skip KH6TY
John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
So my friend I do think WINLINK has a lot to do with it
when even a keyboard to keyboard QSO get's phone calls
from some lid. But I guess, I'll look
I would belive that if it was not for that fact that shortly
after a PACTOR QSO the phone has rang telling me what
orifice I should shove my pactor equipment into. Leaving no
guessing what so ever about it. Then not even giving me
time to say I was in a 2 person QSO. That my friend was
the last
>>>AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of "John Becker, WOJAB"
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 12:50 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Why does the ARRL c
I can clearly see that this anti Pactor rant will Never end.
John, W0JAB
What it means is that the channel will be dominated with "personal"
Winlink Pactor-III traffic, completely filling it up, with no sharing,
or any space left for truly narrowband modes like PSK31 - all in the
name of emergency communications. It has proven impossible for a
Pactor-III ARQ station
live the Queen
David
KD4NUE
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Rick Ellison
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 7:36 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Why does the ARRL continue to push for P
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 02:53:16PM +0100, Ian Wade G3NRW wrote:
> From: Andy obrien
> Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 Time: 08:08:41
>
> >and
> >2K80J2D (which is generally known as
> >PACTOR-III) ??? are popular narrowband data modes.
>
> Since when was Pactor III a narrow-band mode?
In comparison to
From: Andy obrien
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 Time: 08:08:41
>and
>2K80J2D (which is generally known as
>PACTOR-III) – are popular narrowband data modes.
Since when was Pactor III a narrow-band mode?
--
73
Ian, G3NRW
When did Pactor-III (up to 2200 Hz wide, I think), suddenly become a
"narrowband" data mode?
73 - Skip KH6TY
Andy obrien wrote:
It seems odd to me too Rick.
However, i do note...
means of on-off keying (emission designator 150HA1A) continues to be
used by amateur stations because
of i
It seems odd to me too Rick.
However, i do note...
means of on-off keying (emission designator 150HA1A) continues to be used by
amateur stations because
of its reliability in difficult propagation conditions. ARRL also states
that the other requested emission
designators – 60H0J2B (which is gener
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-76A1.pdf
This just makes no sense to me why you would push Pactor III on a
channelized frequency setting..
73 Rick N2AMG
www.n2amg.com
25 matches
Mail list logo
