Jose Amador wrote:
>
>
> For me, the proven offenders can be ATTENDED stations.
Indeed, Jose, this is always possible. Who among us has not on some
erroneous occasion transmitted without listening long ENOUGH, and
instead unintentionally QRMed an innocent QSO? But VERY few of us would
ever d
For me, the proven offenders can be ATTENDED stations.
The past week I was linked to a Winlink station on 40 meters when
somebody started calling on top of us.
I turned on my linear, and he kept on calling. Three options to be
heard: my correspondent,
me, and me and my half gallon linear. An
radio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] (was : Trouble at mill RTTY contesters war
Dave AA6YQ wrote:
>
> No one is beating on Pactor. The objects of mass disgust are
> unattended stations that transmit without listening, thereby QRMing
> other stations. Many of these happen to use Pacto
At 07:29 PM 1/13/2008, you wrote:
>
>John, do you really characterize the innovation that's been driving the
>development of new digital modes as "madness"? Do you really think that the
>explosion of soundcard digital mode users is "the problem".
No I don't Dave.
But I do feel that some have c
Dave AA6YQ wrote:
>
> No one is beating on Pactor. The objects of mass disgust are
> unattended stations that transmit without listening, thereby QRMing
> other stations. Many of these happen to use Pactor III, but that's no
> fault of Pactor III. As I've said here before, we don't ban cars
>
No one is beating on Pactor. The objects of mass disgust are unattended
stations that transmit without listening, thereby QRMing other stations.
Many of these happen to use Pactor III, but that's no fault of Pactor III.
As I've said here before, we don't ban cars because some people drive drunk;
n
Sorry about the bandwidth.
"Stop the madness!" how?
Programmers love changing programs.
As always flames to me, respectful and clean posts to the reflector.
73 ES CUL
==
Mr. John R. Klim II
N3KHK
ARRL LM-0008416263, AMSAT LM-2187, QRPARCI #1
