Re: [digitalradio] NBEMS/Flarq Frequencies

2008-01-05 Thread Rick
This rather surprises me as I can normally decode PSK31 stations right next to each other with no problems at all. Even if they are almost touching each other on the waterfall. And that is using a very wide filter, typically voice bandwidth, unless I have some very strong signals that is desens

Re: [digitalradio] NBEMS/Flarq Frequencies

2008-01-05 Thread Andrew O'Brien
While in the shack today, I will be FLARQing on 10137 plus 1000 HZ AF. Andy K3UK FN02hk On Jan 5, 2008 4:02 AM, Rein Couperus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Being so close to another net frequency is not going to work unless you > provide a proper filter. > > Using flarq efficiently you need to > *

Re: [digitalradio] NBEMS/Flarq Frequencies

2008-01-05 Thread Rein Couperus
Being so close to another net frequency is not going to work unless you provide a proper filter. Using flarq efficiently you need to * use a 500 Hz filter or better * use a distance of 500 Hz. We have tried to put 2 pskmail servers on a 250 Hz distance but they qrm'ed each other in such a way t

Re: [digitalradio] NBEMS/Flarq Frequencies

2008-01-04 Thread kh6ty
are you! Skip - Original Message - From: "Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 7:29 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] NBEMS/Flarq Frequencies > Aren't the PropNet operators monitoring their transmissions? Here in the > U.S. beacons are no

Re: [digitalradio] NBEMS/Flarq Frequencies

2008-01-04 Thread Rick
Aren't the PropNet operators monitoring their transmissions? Here in the U.S. beacons are not permitted below the 10 meter band except for the special international beacons. I realize that there are scofflaws (or worse) operating outside the rules, but it does not seem wise to promote this unle

Re: [digitalradio] NBEMS/Flarq Frequencies

2008-01-04 Thread Russell Blair
> I'll be watching 30m now and will be available for > some NBEMS ARQ file > transfers. > > 73, Skip KH6TY > > > - Original Message - > From: "Andrew O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 6:12 PM >

Re: [digitalradio] NBEMS/Flarq Frequencies

2008-01-04 Thread kh6ty
uency. I'll be watching 30m now and will be available for some NBEMS ARQ file transfers. 73, Skip KH6TY - Original Message - From: "Andrew O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 6:12 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] NBEMS/Flarq Frequenc

Re: [digitalradio] NBEMS/Flarq Frequencies

2008-01-04 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I think it might make sense to use the SAME frequencies as Propnet. This may make no sense at all to others, so what do you think. I would not want to interfere with Propnet beacons since they perform a valuable service, but if we are going to beacon, perhaps we should use the same frequency but

Re: [digitalradio] NBEMS/Flarq Frequencies

2008-01-04 Thread Darrel Smith
Ted, I am beaconing on 10.138Mhz (10.137+1Khz) psk63 now. I see there are a couple of Propnet stations beaconing using psk31 on the same frequency. Darrel, VE7CUS On 4-Jan-08, at 6:11 AM, Ted Huf wrote: Where and when is the testing of NBEMS and Flarq going on? I would like to do some