Re: [steering-discuss] Optional local NGO donation links on download and extension pages

Hi Andre, *, 2011/10/19 André Schnabel : > > this proposal is now recorded as approved by the SC at >    http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/TDF/BoD_Decisions > > So - all we need is someone to implement this :)  Is there someone at the > website team able to take care about this? So the requireme

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

Hi *, On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote: > Ken Springer wrote on 2011-11-02 22:48: >> >> If you prefer your help system to be a forum, that's available through >> the Nabble interface and Gmane. > > sadly, Nabble is not seen as forum at all. Yes, because it is none. > I

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: user forums ?

Hi Augustine, *, On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Augustine Souza wrote: > On 11/8/11, drew wrote: > > en.libreofficeforum.org is not too shabby at all and would serve the purpose. > > If I remember there was some opposition to Google ads featuring > competing software but that's really a non-iss

Re: [tdf-discuss] [announce DRAFT] TDF announces its new Membership Committee

安部さん、 2011/11/10 Takeshi Abe : > 皆様 > > 安部です。 > TDF より新しい Membership Committee のアナウンスがありました。 > 以下のように訳文を用意しております。 > ご確認よろしくお願いいたします。 安部さんの作った翻訳書はいいです。 コメントを一つだけあります。 > --- > TDF は新しい Membership Committee をお知らせします > > The Document Foundation は今日新しい Membership Committe をお知らせできること "今日"はちょっとー　オリギナル

Re: [tdf-discuss] [announce DRAFT] TDF announces its new Membership Committee

Hi *, 2011/11/11 Takeshi Abe : > On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 17:34:53 +0100, Christian Lohmaier > wrote: > (snip) >> >> If the announcement is to be sent out today or tomorrow, I guess >> keeping the "today" is just fine - but I would find it awkward to read >&g

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [tdf-discuss] Re: Please do not submit Bug reports concerning 3.5 Beta0

Hi Petr, *, On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Petr Mladek wrote: > Pedro Lino píše v Čt 15. 12. 2011 v 23:15 +: >> The builds available for Linux at >> http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/ >> are only 2.3Mb in size... > > Could you please provide more information? Which file size

Re: [tdf-discuss] Can we replace "Floppy Disk"

On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Although not paying sufficient homage to the brilliant Umberto Eco, it would > seem that having good tool tips would matter for both the icons (which are > often quite tiny) and for accessibility reasons.  And the > internationalizat

Re: [tdf-discuss] Suggestion: Open to last edited page

Hi Volker, *, On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Volker Merschmann wrote: > > I remember we have had this feature in a former OOo-version, but I do > not remember why it has been dropped. Because it has not been dropped. It behaves just as in OOo: When the data in user-data doesn't match the data

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [tdf-discuss] Italian user list seems to be broken or in busy state: what's the matter?

Hi *, On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote: > Carlo Strata wrote on 2012-01-12 13:34: > >> Italian user list (us...@it.libreoffice.org) seems to be broken or in >> some "busy state": what's the matter? >> It may be since about January the 4th. > [...] > I just checked, and t

Re: [tdf-discuss] LibOCon proposals

Hi Andreas, *, On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Andreas Mantke wrote: > Am Freitag, 3. Februar 2012, 14:08:58 schrieb Jesús Corrius: >> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Florian Effenberger >> wrote: > (...) >> > I am open for discussion, of course, but I wonder that you seem to have a >> > differe

[tdf-discuss] Question/Request for Zaragoza team: more travel details please (how to get to Zaragoza)

Hi *, I was approached with a plea to bring up the travel topic to the list, so straight to the point: * It would be nice if Zaragoza's team could elaborate more on how to get to Zaragoza (by plane) It should not be a huge problem, given that it already held some international conferences, but n

Re: [tdf-discuss] LibOCon proposals

Hi Juan, *, On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Juan Pradas wrote: > > thanks for your remarks and questions about the flight connections. Thank you very much for the detailed response. > [...] > In your case, for example, I would probably get a flight from Munich to > Barcelona, Madrid or Bilbao,

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Security Advisories

Hi NoOp, On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:56 AM, NoOp wrote: > On 03/22/2012 06:31 PM, Italo Vignoli wrote: >> NoOp wrote: >> >>> It would be nice if someone 'official' (ala TDF) could post the >>> CVE-2012-0037 notice on both the user and announce lists. The public was not supposed to know of this CVE

Re: [tdf-discuss] Mail Merge to Email in Writer

Hi *, I know I'm late to this thread, but anyway. On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote: > On 13/04/2012 14:40, Cor Nouws wrote: >> >> Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote (13-04-12 15:35) >> >>> Yes, but that is what an email client does, not a word processor >> >> Then how to

Re: [tdf-discuss] AskLibO blitzes

Hi Marc, *, On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Marc Paré wrote: > Would it be a good idea to organize a monthly call for a AskLibO blitz? > > I think this would solve some of the outstanding unanswered questions queue. > We could all agree on maybe a 2-day spree where we could all check in and > an

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: AskLibO blitzes

Hi Rainer, *, On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > Pedro schrieb: > >> The main problem with AskLibO is that there are few people answering >> questions on a regular basis. > > The job there is frustrating. Many of the questions are lousy, but that also > might be a Help pro

Re: [tdf-discuss] Version 3.6.0 is Recommended???

Hi Steven, *, On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Steven Shelton wrote: > On 8/11/2012 4:26 AM, Cor Nouws wrote: >> Pedro wrote (10-08-12 21:03) >>> [...] >> Something we have to keep in mind too for the 3.5.6 version, in RC2 at > the moment... Disabled the "Recommended" string yesterday. Did not a

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Reply settings on this list have changed

Hi Volker, *, On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Volker Merschmann wrote: > 2012/8/14 Marc Paré : >> Le 2012-08-13 15:47, Johnny Rosenberg a écrit : >>> >>> So I click ”Reply to all” (which requires a click more than just >>> replying), In my version of gmail (in chromium browser), there is no di

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Reply settings on this list have changed

Hi Stefan, *, On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Stefan Weigel wrote: > Am 14.08.2012 19:13, schrieb Christian Lohmaier: >> [...] >> They don't want to have to be subscribed (since they already >> receive enough mail to deal with). They want to be able to send a >

Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice Portable

Hi Pedro, On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Pedro wrote: > Hi all > > Is TDF in some way related to LibreOffice Portable? Only insofar that Portable versions are hosten on our mirror infrastructure and are advertized/available on our download pages. They are not produced by TDF itself. > Should

Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice Forums Categories Proposal

Hi *, On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Marc Paré wrote: > Please note that > the categories and forums shown on the page[2], at this point, are only > suggestions and may be modified (some may be removed or added) after we have > discussed this as a group. OK, my 0,02€ :-) Where's the differenc

Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice Forums Categories Proposal

Hi Joel, *, On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Joel Madero wrote: > On 09/27/2012 05:11 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Marc Paré wrote: > [...] Not sure wether I like the creation of an off-topic area right from the start... > [...] >> For

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: LibreOffice Forums Categories Proposal

Hi Marc, *, On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Marc Paré wrote: > Le 2012-09-27 08:11, Christian Lohmaier a écrit : >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Marc Paré wrote: > > Users who have problems with installs generally do not come to a forums/list > with the idea that th

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: Forums Proposal

Hi Charles, *, On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > > But the discussion was started about users forums. Anything besides that > would require the interested teams to have been consulted before. This thread (or these threads, as they have gone to various lists, the "interes

Re: [tdf-discuss] Macro Difficulties

Hi Charles, *, On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Charles Jenkins wrote: > dim dummy() ' Empty array of parameters > > starDesktop = createUnoService("com.sun.star.frame.Desktop") > url = ConvertToUrl( ExcelPath ) > doc = starDesktop.loadComponentFromURL( url, "_blank", 0, dummy )

Re: [tdf-discuss] Macro Difficulties

Hi Charles, *, On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Charles Jenkins wrote: > > Now if only I can find a way to convert my tab-separated .txt file to a > comma-separated .csv file, I think all would be golden. Hmm. Either I'm completely missing the point here, or you do :-) With the properties, you

Re: [tdf-discuss] Macro Difficulties

Hi Charles, *, On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Charles Jenkins wrote: > > You're right. My attempt to fool with options didn't work at first because I > misidentified the file's character set, so I thought the "csv" in the filter > name was significant and embarked on the quest to convert to C

Re: [tdf-discuss] NMake vs MinGW

Hi Jonathan, *, On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > Rainer what i want to understand is why use an external build tool when > there is an equivalent to make built directly into visual studio. You are completely missing the point here. The default build /does/ use Visual S

Re: [tdf-discuss] How I could search queries in the archives of this list?

Hi Guillermo, *, On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Guillermo Molleda Jimena wrote: > How I can search the archives of this list? > In http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ > I not see a search engine. Yes, those archives are simple archives, but the ones hosted at TDF are only o

Re: [tdf-discuss] Libre Office for Android

Hi Gordon, *, On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote: > Can anyone say how this is coming on? The latest I can find on the web was > about this time last year... Development is ongoing, but no end-user ready stuff yet. snapshot-builds are available, but let me stress: D

Re: [tdf-discuss] Can't Locate LibreOfffice 4.0.4

Hi *, On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 4:48 PM, CVAlkan wrote: > I'm currently running version 4.0.3.3 (Build ID: > 0eaa50a932c8f2199a615e1eb30f7ac74279539) on the 64bit Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, and > for the past several days I've been getting the notification that version > 4.0.4 of LibreOffice is available fo

Re: [tdf-discuss] curiously wondering ...

Hi *, On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:44 PM, anne-ology wrote: >... and testing; >are my e-mails getting through to the lists? At least this one made it through to the discuss@documentfoundation list. >I have heard nothing from the last e-mails I sent to the list - >

Re: [tdf-discuss] where is debian help ?

Hi, Fulano Diego Perez schrieb am Sa., 04.06.2016, 13:05: each time selecting LO help, this link wants to load: https ://

Re: [tdf-discuss] need help off this list - need Linux package choice help

Hi, Tim---Kracked_P_P---webmaster schrieb am Mo., 24.10.2016, 5:11: What I need is a real easy, and fast, video file splitter for Ubuntu. Fast and easy to use unfortunately kind of contradict themselves when it comes to video editing.(or rather with the fast tools there's a learning curve.)

Re: [tdf-discuss] outdated LibreOffice Portable (MS Windows)

Hi *, On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:02 AM Florian Effenberger wrote: > Edmund Laugasson wrote on Wed, 17 Oct 2018 > 18:12:02 +0300: > […] > thanks for pointing out! John from PortableApps has created 6.1.2 and it > will be available on our mirrors soon. :-) And now is :-) Skipping 6.1.1 should have

Re: [tdf-discuss] outdated LibreOffice Portable (MS Windows)

Hi Edmund, *, On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:36 AM Edmund Laugasson wrote: > > Sounds like MS Windows version of LibreOffice Portable is not maintained > (or very slowly...)? […] Portable windows version is still maintained by John Haller from portableapps - he made 6.2.2 available to TDF last wee

Re: [tdf-discuss] linux download deb availabe?

Hi Uwe, *, On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Uwe Brauer wrote: > > At the moment there are only rpms available which I could > convert to deb via alien, but I would prefer native debs. They are online, just the website only lists the rpms currently. > Any idea when this will happen? Until the w

Re: [tdf-discuss] Explanation . . . ?

Hi Bernhard, *, 2010/10/1 Bernhard Dippold : > Jon Hamkins schrieb: >> On 10/01/2010 11:31 AM, Bernhard Dippold wrote: >>> Kürti László schrieb: >> [...] > > It might be possible, that they plan to keep investing in OpenOffice.org, > but this has not been stated here. ..and not to mention that if

Re: [tdf-discuss] New name

Hi Mirek, *, On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Mirek M. wrote: > > I'm really excited about the project, but I'm a bit concerned about the > name. What concerns me is that one can't tell how to pronounce the name. > Some pronounce it "librehoffice", some (including me) "leeberoffice", som e > may

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: PPC Mac, Solaris and windows x86_64 Releases

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 8:13 AM, jonathon wrote: > On 10/26/2010 07:17 PM, Carlo Strata wrote: > >> - MacOSX 64 bit on both PPC and X86-64 platforms (I don't know if it >  exists a MacOSX PPC 64 bit OS...); > > Mac OS X is intrinsically 64 bits. That is not true. Only with Mac OSX 10.6 Server ver

Re: [tdf-discuss] Compiling in Windows

Hi *, On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 4:22 PM, plino wrote: > > I'm not a programmer but something is puzzling me: why is LibreOffice > compiled with MS VC++ compiler? This forces the installer to include the > VC++ runtimes... > > Wouldn't it make more sense to use the FOSS compiler MinGW? Well - while

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java dependency

Hi Cedric, * On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 15:32 -0500, T. J. Brumfield wrote: >> Can we get a list of all the components that require Java that would need to >> be reimplemented? > > To start a list we could add: > [...] >  + Base HSQLDB backend

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Java dependency

Hi *, On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 5:19 AM, jonathon wrote: > On 11/03/2010 12:08 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > >>>  + Base HSQLDB backend > >> That would mean: ship a different database with by default, > > SQLite could easily be added. > >> would still need t

Re: [steering-discuss] Fwd: Re: LibO Drupal site

Hi Flo, *, On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote: > Forwarding in agreement with James to this public list > What are your thoughts on this? Well - nothing against giving appropriate credit - but the question is what does he think is appropriate? The problem I personally ha

Re: OOoCon 2010 Talk (was: Re: [tdf-discuss] FreeDesktop Bugzilla)

Hi Christoph, *, On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Christoph Noack wrote: > > [1] Video (approx. 700 MB!) > http://users2.ooodev.org/~ooocon2010/01_september/FT_409/18.15_charles_schulz_mechtilde_stehmann.flv 120MB http://users2.ooodev.org/~cloph/videos/10-09-01_FT_409_18.15_charles_schulz_mech

Re: [tdf-discuss] Content of Beta3 Windows Install-Packages

Hi Stefan, *, On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Stefan Weigel wrote: > Hi, > > * Which languages are included in LibO_3.3.0_Win_x86_install_multi.exe ? > > * Which languages are included in > LibO_3.3.0_Win_x86_install_all_lang.exe ? I forwarded/posted the same question to the libreoffice develo

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Communication in Mailinglist

Hi Larry, *, On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > [...] > Gmail very capable for mailing lists. Except for the very one drawback you just demonstrated: When changing the subject, gmail will break the thread (start a new one) as it will remove the references from the reply. cia

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Communication in Mailinglist

Hi Friedrich, *, On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote: > Christian Lohmaier schrieb: >>On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Larry Gusaas > wrote: > > [...] > >>> Gmail very capable for mailing lists. > >>Except for the very one drawback

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Communication in Mailinglist

Hi Larry, *, On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > On 2010/11/23 11:58 AM  Christian Lohmaier wrote: > > 2. I didn't change the subject, Friedrich Strohmaier changed it. Oh yes, it was changed (but according to usual etiquette, thus was very likely done by gmane i

Re: [tdf-discuss] Download torrent files - Which ones?

Hi Alan, *, On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 4:45 PM, alan c wrote: > I think that one way I can possibly contribute to the project just now is to > seed a number of torrents for others to download. > > I found a large number of torrents, including many libraries I think, when I > looked, seeded some of t

Re: [tdf-discuss] the distortion in chinese font in writer

Hi ! On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Jih-Yao Lin wrote: > when i select one line of my chinese font article, there will be some > distortion at the beginning and the end of the high light line. Please file a bugreport and provide a screenshot, and if possible an export to PDF and the original d

Re: [tdf-discuss] deb installer - have to manually modify link

Hi *, On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Stefan Weigel wrote: > Am 06.12.2010 21:59, schrieb Friedrich Strohmaier: >> Stefan Weigel schrieb: >>> Am 06.12.2010 12:21, schrieb Sebastian Spaeth: On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:52:25 +0100, Stefan Weigel wrote: > Try the other download page > http:

Re: [tdf-discuss] deb installer - have to manually modify link

Hi Stefan, *, On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Stefan Weigel wrote: > Am 06.12.2010 12:21, schrieb Sebastian Spaeth: > [...] I have been > told that my script causes too much server load (which I can´t prove > or disprove), No, you misunderstood/misinterpreted. I was telling that I want a solutio

Re: [tdf-discuss] deb installer - have to manually modify link

Hi Stefan, *, On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Stefan Weigel wrote: > Am 07.12.2010 01:54, schrieb Christian Lohmaier: > [...] > And generally, is caching really so important? Aren´t there > trillions of pure php-server-based solutions out in the web? Well, I cannot tell yet, as the

Re: [tdf-discuss] deb installer - have to manually modify link

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:23 AM, David Nelson wrote: > Hi, :-) > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 02:54, Stefan Weigel > wrote: >> Well, someone just changed http://www.test.libreoffice.org/download/ >> and made downloading again very inconvenient. >> >> The convenient script can still be found here >> ht

Re: [tdf-discuss] deb installer - have to manually modify link

Hi David, *, On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 2:39 PM, David Nelson wrote: > Hi, :-) > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 20:58, Christian Lohmaier > wrote: >> Stefan already pointed out that it is not a /test/ site. It is the >> site under construction. > > It's a "test&quo

Re: [tdf-discuss] deb installer - have to manually modify link

Hi David, On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:26 PM, David Nelson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 22:04, Christian Lohmaier > wrote: > [...] >>> By the way, could you fix that problem about the missing CSS style >>> sheet(s) I mentioned in the ohter thread? > [...] > htt

Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice rc2 torrent download?

Fi Frank, *, On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Frank Esposito wrote: > Is there a torrent download for the latest release candidate? Sure - http://tracker.documentfoundation.org:6969/index.html?search=rc2 (just append ".torrent" to any http://download.documentfoundation.org download link) ciao

Re: [tdf-discuss] A better idea for a download package.

Hi Christophe, *, On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Christophe Strobbe wrote: > At 21:03 30/11/2010, Charles Marcus wrote: >> >> (...) >> >> The current size problem as compared to OOo is because all of the >> language packs are included... and this situation is only temporary >> until storage is n

Re: [tdf-discuss] Forums bi-directionally cooperating with extant mailing lists?

On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:52 PM, J.B. Nicholson-Owens wrote: > RGB ES wrote: >> >> https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/forums/ The forum module on the website is meant for user-registration/user-profile management. > Will the forums be bi-directional where forum posts are echoed on the > appro

Re: [tdf-discuss] [Forum]How will the forum be organized?

Hi Sophie, *, On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Sigrid Carrera wrote: > >  PS: If I have written complete nonsense, then I'm sure, that one of > the founders / administrators will correct me. ;) No, your explanation was totally correct - the forum is only meant to allow people to create an accou

Re: [tdf-discuss] Download libreoffice button in new LibreOffice website

Hi Jan, *, On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Jan Parttimaa wrote: > > I just wondering how can I add new 'download LibreOffice 3.3' button > in finnish site? (text on button will be in finnish) "use the source" :-) Download LibreOffice 3.3 ciao Christian -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to

Re: [tdf-discuss] [libreoffice-website] [Forum] How will the forum be organized?

Hi Michael, *, On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Michael Wheatland wrote: > > Your average end user > will likely never search through mailing list threads, The average end user will not search web-forums either. My personal experience with forums is that they are useless for technical, more co

Re: [tdf-discuss] New year - new listmailfooter

Hi *; On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Michael Wheatland wrote: > > It might be worth placing a link to the appropriate Nabble archive. ie > per post or mailing list. Each message has an Archived-At header pointing to the corresponding message. Not at nabble, but at mail-archive.com ciao Christ

Re: [steering-discuss] relocating mailing lists at libreoffice.org?

Hi *, On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote: > Hm, seems the search doesn't work. It's here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/website@libreoffice.org/msg02999.html well, it does work - you just need to give it a chance to receive and index it :-) there was a increase in processi

Re: [tdf-discuss] Oracle Contributor Agreement and LibreOffice contributions

Hi Christophe, On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Christophe Strobbe wrote: > > 1. Now imagine that I contribute code to LibreOffice and the contribution is > accepted. Is it then still acceptable (from a copyright point of view) to > sign the Oracle Contributor Agreement and submit the same code t

Re: [tdf-discuss] MacOS X install: use native packaging which can be installed without user confirmation?

Hi *, On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 6:02 PM, J.B. Nicholson-Owens wrote: > Is there some way to install LibreOffice and its language packs completely > from the command line? the Installation of languagepacks on mac consists of extracting a tarball included within the dmg - the GUI is only there to fi

Re: [tdf-discuss] Unable to use SCIM to import CJK languages into LibreOffice on 64-bit Ubuntu 10.10

Hi Henri, *, On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 4:39 PM, M Henri Day wrote: > Same problem, of course, when using OOo ; I'm using the latest > (Swedish) 3.3 version in both cases. SCIM works fine with other applications > on Ubuntu, like the gedit text editor or Gmail's compose. As OOo/LO doesn't support G

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Unable to use SCIM to import CJK languages into LibreOffice on 64-bit Ubuntu 10.10

Hi Henri, On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:18 AM, M Henri Day wrote: > 2011/2/21 NoOp >> On 02/20/2011 07:39 AM, M Henri Day wrote: > The thing that surprised me with respect > to Christian's advice above to set SCIM as my «global default» was that I > thought I had already  done so ; i e, I had edited

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Unable to use SCIM to import CJK languages into LibreOffice on 64-bit Ubuntu 10.10

Hi Peter, On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Peter Junge wrote: > On 02/21/2011 04:18 PM, M Henri Day wrote: > > SCIM is AFAIK really outdated. SCIM works fine, worked fine for the past years. > IBus is certainly the better choice. There have been so many "better choices" already that really fu

Re: [tdf-discuss] Libreoffice for Mac

Hi *, On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Olav Dahlum wrote: > On 04/03/11 13:14, Laurence Jeloudev wrote: >> Will libreoffice be supported for future os s on the Mac? >> >> Etc Mac Osx lion? > > As far as I know, it's built on Tiger, but I use the latest Snow Leopard > here. No, it is not necessari

Re: [tdf-discuss] Mail List issues

Hi *, On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:05 AM, NoOp wrote: > [...] > I'm not versed on mailman, so I don't know the answer. However, the > current issue of mail list subscribers not being able to > subscribe/unsubscribe/modify user settings/etc in mlmmj as they can in > mailman is an issue. And it will li

Re: [tdf-discuss] Mail List issues

Hi James, *, On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:50 AM, James Wilde wrote: > On Mar 9, 2011, at 04:05 , NoOp wrote: > [...] We have no way of making public that a message has been moderated, That's just wrong, as the sure hint for that is that it is actually sent to the list subscribers. So when you receiv

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Mail List issues

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 6:17 AM, NoOp wrote: > On 03/09/2011 06:16 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > ... >> And you mentioned that one could have learned from OOo lists: >> Ha, that is a good one. The OOo lists have explicit unsubscribe >> instructions in *every* footer, b

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Mail List issues

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:29 AM, NoOp wrote: > On 03/10/2011 05:09 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 6:17 AM, NoOp wrote: >>> On 03/09/2011 06:16 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > [...] >>> to share your expertise with us, without calling peopl

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Get and appove: recommended Soundfile pronouncing "LibreOffice"

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:26 PM, M Henri Day wrote: > 2011/4/1 dionysien > >> Hi all >> >> We must keep in mind that languages vary enormously with respect non only >> to >> their available vowels and consonants, but also to their possible >> syllables. >> >> The component words of LibreOffice, th

Re: [tdf-discuss] QA - Bug Confirming: Volunteers required

Hi Steve, *, On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Steve Edmonds wrote: > How was the session on triage. "Failure" basically - (or also bad timing, as 3.4beta has not been available, and when it was, it turned out that it wasn't running / there were big problems installing it, so people stayed away)

Re: [tdf-discuss] Forums... again

On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 2:30 PM, RGB ES wrote: > We can discuss up to the end of the time if forums are better or worse > than mailing lists. We can discuss about why people do not use "better > communication methods" (whichever those methods are) or do not RTFM. > > We can discuss everything, but

Re: [tdf-discuss] European Commitee enter talks with MS licences, Please make your action today against it.

Hi *, On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 5:40 AM, Jon Hamkins wrote: > On 04/06/2011 04:54 AM, toki wrote: > >> There are roughly one billion words in the English language. You could >> have a LibO spell checker that contains each of those words. > > Actually, there are only about one million English words

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Forums... again

Hi Augistine, *, On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Augustine Souza wrote: > I have no issues with a forum that is commercial presumably to [b]cover > costs[/b]. As Andy says, the ads are easily blocked (in that I had no need > to take specific steps to block ads from that site). But the point was

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Forums... again

Hi Drew, *, On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:05 AM, drew wrote: > On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 10:44 +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Augustine Souza >> wrote: > [...] > In general I would like to see the ads limited and focused, but out > ri

Re: [tdf-discuss] Question about proposing the creation of a new format

Hi Ben, *, On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote: > On 25/04/11 7:11 PM, drew wrote: >> >> As far as LibreOffice being a display client for ebooks, I would >> agree it is not in scope. >> >> However, should LibreOffice have support for producing documents >> targeted to eReaders? I

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Forums... again

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:13 AM, toki wrote: > On 25/04/2011 08:44, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > >> It is OK if it has a paypal or whatever donate link to explicitly > cover the costs of running the server (but it must be clear that this > > You do realize that the organiza

Re: [tdf-discuss] My application was rejected, ;-(

Hi Jaime, *, On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Jaime R. Garza wrote: > > my application was rejected, apparently I haven't made non-trivial > contributions to the TDF. :-( ...or you failed to list them/did not provide people who can support/verify the claims you have made in the application, or w

Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice Math: "There is no"

Hi Olivier, *, On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Olivier Hallot wrote: > Em 04-05-2011 13:11, M Henri Day escreveu: >> 2011/5/4 Olivier Hallot >>> >>> So, if this symbol get implemented in Opensymbol, it will be trivial to >>> make it show in the Element window Sure, but it won't be compatibil

Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice Math: "There is no"

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:19 PM, M Henri Day wrote: > 2011/5/4 Robert Derman > [...] > (for me at least), it is not the hex code, but rather the decimal code that > must be used to import the glyph ; thus entering «2204» (without the > quotation marks) in the tool gives me the desired ∄, whereas e

Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice Math: "There is no"

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:06 PM, M Henri Day wrote: > 2011/5/4 Christian Lohmaier > [...] > I'm not quite sure I follow you here, Christian ; 089c is the hexadecimal > representation of the number represented by the decimal 2204 Yes, but the 2204 is not a decimal number.

Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice Math: "There is no"

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 7:26 PM, M Henri Day wrote: > > Bernhard, you must have missed my most recent reply to Christian above. My > error was *not* in attempting to «reconvert» a hexadecimal representation to > yet another hexadecimal, Yes, you did... > but rather in simply mistaking a decimal >

[steering-discuss] Re: LibreOffice TSC call minutes, Thur May 12th

Hi *, On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Andras Timar wrote: > [...] > This was the first time when Rainer joined to our call. He does a > tremendous job with bug triaging and QA. He wants to contact most active > bugzilla users and coordinate their work. The problem is that we have > many unconfir

Re: [tdf-discuss] mailing list content disappearance

Hi "e-letter" - a realname would be nice... On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:36 PM, e-letter wrote: > On 13/05/2011, discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org > wrote: >> Topics (messages 6130 through 6131): >> >> [tdf-discuss] Re: Paid Developers >>       6130 - Ian Lynch >>       6131 - ??? > > When can

Re: [tdf-discuss] desktop integration

Hi Bernhard, *, On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 2:57 AM, Bernhard Dippold wrote: > Valentin schrieb: >> >> I tested today the latest LibreOffice builds (beta 5 of 3.4) and  I saw >> the >> better desktop integration in the Ubuntu-Desktop (10.10). Good work! >> But ... since years there is one thing, that

Re: [tdf-discuss] desktop integration

Hi Sean, *, On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Sean Carlos wrote: > > For what its worth, on Fedora 14 64 bit the program icons no longer show up > in the applications menu.  This is a regression in beta 5 relative to beta > 4. Did you install the desktop-integration package? (and which one?) > I

Re: [tdf-discuss] Java Support to Stay or Not?

Hi Marc-André, *, 2011/5/19 Marc-André Laverdière : > I've read somewhere If you cannot even remember where you read it, that source is not very reliable, is it? > that there is discussion on ditching support for > Java in LO. Is this true? No, this is not true. There are no plans whatsoever to

Re: RE : Re: [tdf-discuss] RE: Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice

Hi *, On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Ian Lynch wrote: >> >> I should think there is probably >> broader commercial or legal reason for Oracle to hold on to the copyright >> such as tax relief or just in case it *might* somehow become valuable.

[tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice

Hi Allen, *, On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Allen Pulsifer wrote: > [...] > I don't know what vision IBM has for the project.  I don't know what code > contribution they are going to make--I'm certain they will make some, but I > don't know what they will be.  I don't know what contributions mem

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: RE : Re: RE: Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice

Hi Marvin, *, On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > The Apache Foundation releases software only under the Apache License 2.0. > Other entities may take ASF-released code and bundle it in products licensed > under less permissive terms, including proprietary products and cop

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: RE : Re: RE: Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice

Hi Dennis, *; (sorry to you for mailing twice, I did mean to send it to the list, and not as pm only) On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:26 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Since the third-party stuff is already integrated into LibreOffice, it > doesn't matter whether it passes through the Apache OpenOffi

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice

Man, how I love fullquotes :-/ On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Laurence Jeloudev wrote: > Make a new license agreement for openoffice? With other contributing > companies. Sorry, but what is your point? my point was that it is in my opionon a stupid idea for LO people to sign up as contributors

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: RE : Re: RE: Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice

Hi Sam, *, On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Christian Lohmaier > wrote: > [...] >> It's not even clear whether it will be the current codebase or some >> older version IBM is basing their version on. > > It is the

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice

On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:35:46AM +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote: >> Only Oracle could add another license to the mix, but if everyone >> subscribes to the apache-proposal, and thus shows their support for >> th

  1   2   >