Hi Tim,
Thank you very much. It worked like a charm :).
It's true, this topic searcher doesn't work, it is almost impossible to find
anything.
Thanks again, I'll be back soon with new questions.
Regards,
Sergio
--
http://restlet.tigris.org/d
I don't think the nested router works the way you expect. You might be able
to tweak it to work, but consider creating a separate authenticator (and
tracer) instance for each guarded resource. I've written this up several
times, but I can never find my old postings when I need them, so I've
created
Hi again,
I want to protect some resources under /apps/{appid}:
/apps/{appId}/object
To avoid flooding I have pasted my code here:
http://pastebin.com/gqc2dbFS
I use the tracer filter to print the details of the request. The requested URI
is:
"Resource URI : http://localhost:8080/apps/1";
W
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Sergio wrote:
> Can I attach the authenticator to only some of the methods of my
> resources? I.e. protect only PUT, POST, and DELETE while keeping GET
> public? Maybe using roles?
>
You can do per-resource or even per-method authorization: Remember that
authenti
Thank you very much for your answer. I think I would use the "classes" approach
using the createInboundRoute as in the book.
How about my second question? Can I attach the authenticator to only some of
the methods of my resources? I.e. protect only PUT, POST, and DELETE while
keeping GET public
5 matches
Mail list logo
