Ooops. Good catch Bastian.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Bastian Bloessl
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 09 Sep 2014, at 15:42, Tom Rondeau wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Bastian Bloessl
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > looking at
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Dan CaJacob wrote:
> Does this change affect the recommended block settings to make the magic
> happen?
>
> Very Respectfully,
>
> Dan CaJacob
>
No, this doesn't change the behavior too much. I suspect your settings will
continue to work just fine.
Tom
> On
Does this change affect the recommended block settings to make the magic
happen?
Very Respectfully,
Dan CaJacob
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Bastian Bloessl
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 09 Sep 2014, at 15:42, Tom Rondeau wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon,
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Bastian Bloessl
wrote:
>
> On 09 Sep 2014, at 15:42, Tom Rondeau wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Bastian Bloessl
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > looking at the clock recovery MM code, I wonder if
> d_omega_relative_limit is a relative or absolute deviat
