On 02/08/2017 10:45 PM, John Levine via dmarc-discuss wrote (after Jim
Popovitch wrote):
They have an obligation, to everyone, to get it right, irregardless of
sender preferences.
I have to say that it's amusing that someone apparently believes that
every DMARC installation in the world should
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:45 AM, John Levine via dmarc-discuss
wrote:
>>They have an obligation, to everyone, to get it right, irregardless of
>>sender preferences.
>
> I have to say that it's amusing that someone apparently believes that
> every DMARC installation in the world should rewrite their
>They have an obligation, to everyone, to get it right, irregardless of
>sender preferences.
I have to say that it's amusing that someone apparently believes that
every DMARC installation in the world should rewrite their code,
breaking backward compatibility, merely because he can't be bothered
t
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 5:01 AM, Sistemisti Posta via dmarc-discuss
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> how do you manage DMARC in multidomain environment?
>
> Renew the DKIM keys, deal with all DNS record... is not easy.
You could always use CNAMEs back to a few rotated keys.
-Jim P.
__
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 3:13 AM, Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
wrote:
>
>Are you conceding that receivers sending reports may not find your preferences
>terribly important?
They have an obligation, to everyone, to get it right, irregardless of
sender preferences.
> Noting Google's tendency t
Hello,
how do you manage DMARC in multidomain environment?
Renew the DKIM keys, deal with all DNS record... is not easy.
I use OpenDKIM over LDAP for key management and I will try to help me
with this tool:
https://github.com/falon/dmarc-assistant
If you like to see it, I will appreciate
I'd add the the unsubscribe process has the same problem with clicking
the confirmation link, and that using the reply-to-message approach
works here too.
- Roland
On 02/08/2017 04:18 PM, Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss
Jim Popovitch wrote:
You should definitely disregard reports that aren't useful to you.
>>>
>>> I'd actually prefer to work with the sender in order to fully
>>> understand the differences between what they see and what larger
>>> receivers see.
>>
>> Given that feedback is provided on an as-
That's the problem I'm having. It turns out that you can successfully use the
email approach suggested further down the confirmation email instead of
clicking the link.
- Roland
From: dmarc-discuss on behalf of Jim
Popovitch via dmarc-discuss
Sent: Saturday,