Re: [DNSOP] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2016-08-03 Thread Terry Manderson
That works for me. Cheers Terry On 4/08/2016, 8:53 AM, "Wes Hardaker" wrote: >Terry Manderson writes: > >> Hi Spencer, >> >> On 14/07/2016, 12:57 PM, "Spencer Dawkins at IETF" >> wrote: >>> >>>Terry, I like where you're headed, but just to ask the obvious question, >>>are you thinking the dra

Re: [DNSOP] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2016-08-03 Thread Wes Hardaker
Terry Manderson writes: > Hi Spencer, > > On 14/07/2016, 12:57 PM, "Spencer Dawkins at IETF" > wrote: >> >>Terry, I like where you're headed, but just to ask the obvious question, >>are you thinking the draft would, or would not, also contain something >>like "at the time this document was appro

Re: [DNSOP] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2016-07-13 Thread Terry Manderson
Hi Spencer, On 14/07/2016, 12:57 PM, "Spencer Dawkins at IETF" wrote: > >Terry, I like where you're headed, but just to ask the obvious question, >are you thinking the draft would, or would not, also contain something >like "at the time this document was approved, a domain used for this test >was

Re: [DNSOP] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2016-07-13 Thread Spencer Dawkins at IETF
This is Not My Yes, but ... On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:28 AM, Terry Manderson wrote: > Hi Wes, > > Thanks for responding. > > I'll trim to only the the remaining items needing a response, and express > my appreciation at the clarified items. > > On 9/07/2016, 9:53 AM, "iesg on behalf of Wes Hard

Re: [DNSOP] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2016-07-12 Thread Terry Manderson
Hi Wes, Thanks for responding. I'll trim to only the the remaining items needing a response, and express my appreciation at the clarified items. On 9/07/2016, 9:53 AM, "iesg on behalf of Wes Hardaker" wrote: >"Terry Manderson" writes: > > >> s1.2 is https://github.com/ogud/DNSSEC_ALG_Check go

Re: [DNSOP] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2016-07-08 Thread Wes Hardaker
"Terry Manderson" writes: > Abstract: s/outline potential/outlines potential/ Hmm. My version already has that. Yay! > s1.1 > second bullet, perhaps you could just say "not DNSSEC aware" to be > parsimonious with words > third bullet '"middle-boxes" actively'? > fourth bullet "Network c

Re: [DNSOP] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2016-07-08 Thread Wes Hardaker
"Terry Manderson" writes: > In section 4, the second "Note", I urge you to reconsider using the term > "crap-ware", and words "stupid", "crap".. these make this document look > and sound very poor for an IETF published document. Knowing the > intelligence of the authors I can't see how this was t

[DNSOP] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2016-07-05 Thread Terry Manderson
Terry Manderson has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Pl