On Tue, February 22, 2011 04:25, Indan Zupancic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, February 20, 2011 14:21, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> Well, don't start jumping around, yet. These patches are just to rule out
>> some theories. Now: Is it fixed with just the 2nd patch alone or do you need
>> both
>> patches? Th
Hi,
On Sun, February 20, 2011 14:21, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Well, don't start jumping around, yet. These patches are just to rule out
> some theories. Now: Is it fixed with just the 2nd patch alone or do you need
> both
> patches? This is very important, so please test extensively whether there a
On Tue, February 22, 2011 04:25, Indan Zupancic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, February 20, 2011 14:21, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> Well, don't start jumping around, yet. These patches are just to rule out
>> some theories. Now: Is it fixed with just the 2nd patch alone or do you need
>> both
>> patches? Th
Hi,
On Sun, February 20, 2011 14:21, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Well, don't start jumping around, yet. These patches are just to rule out
> some theories. Now: Is it fixed with just the 2nd patch alone or do you need
> both
> patches? This is very important, so please test extensively whether there a
Hi Peter,
The new corruption is "fixed" with daniel's patch from
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/20/25
On Mon, February 21, 2011 05:10, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Indan Zupancic wrote:
>> > Confirm I also have this issue on my X40, but there are other bugs
>> > that are much more significant so I haven't
Indan Zupancic wrote:
> > Confirm I also have this issue on my X40, but there are other bugs
> > that are much more significant so I haven't bothered mentioning this.
>
> What issues?
The one I confirmed is corrupted graphics within Gecko. I haven't had
Xv working for a long time either. Not sure
Hi,
Feel free to ignore this post, it's a it of rambling.
On Sun, February 20, 2011 11:55, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> I've just noticed that one of the patches (the 2nd one) doesn't work
> as advertised. Please retest with the attached one.
I was wondering why that was, so I looked a bit closer:
Ol
Hi,
On Sun, February 20, 2011 14:21, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Well, don't start jumping around, yet. These patches are just to rule
> out some theories.
I know, that's why I said I don't mind testing other patches.
> Now: Is it fixed with just the 2nd patch alone or do you
> need both patches? Thi
Hi Peter,
The new corruption is "fixed" with daniel's patch from
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/20/25
On Mon, February 21, 2011 05:10, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Indan Zupancic wrote:
>> > Confirm I also have this issue on my X40, but there are other bugs
>> > that are much more significant so I haven't
Indan Zupancic wrote:
> > Confirm I also have this issue on my X40, but there are other bugs
> > that are much more significant so I haven't bothered mentioning this.
>
> What issues?
The one I confirmed is corrupted graphics within Gecko. I haven't had
Xv working for a long time either. Not sure
Hi,
Feel free to ignore this post, it's a it of rambling.
On Sun, February 20, 2011 11:55, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> I've just noticed that one of the patches (the 2nd one) doesn't work
> as advertised. Please retest with the attached one.
I was wondering why that was, so I looked a bit closer:
Ol
Hi,
On Sun, February 20, 2011 14:21, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Well, don't start jumping around, yet. These patches are just to rule
> out some theories.
I know, that's why I said I don't mind testing other patches.
> Now: Is it fixed with just the 2nd patch alone or do you
> need both patches? Thi
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 12:19:14PM +0100, Indan Zupancic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Good news:
>
> On Sun, February 20, 2011 11:55, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> > I've created two quick patches to check a few theories, please test them
> >> > (both patches independently and both together). Patches attached.
>
Hi,
Good news:
On Sun, February 20, 2011 11:55, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> > I've created two quick patches to check a few theories, please test them
>> > (both patches independently and both together). Patches attached.
>>
>> Tried with both applied, doesn't change anything.
>
> I've just noticed t
Hi Daniel,
On Sun, February 20, 2011 10:20, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 03:20:15AM +0100, Indan Zupancic wrote:
>> Sorry, I plainly forgot to mention that. I'm on my Thinkpad X40 with gen 2
>> hardware, 855GM.
>
> Ah, craptastic i855gm. Is this with the HIC poke patch?
Yeah, th
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 03:20:15AM +0100, Indan Zupancic wrote:
> > I've created two quick patches to check a few theories, please test them
> > (both patches independently and both together). Patches attached.
>
> Tried with both applied, doesn't change anything.
I've just noticed that one
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 03:20:15AM +0100, Indan Zupancic wrote:
> Sorry, I plainly forgot to mention that. I'm on my Thinkpad X40 with gen 2
> hardware, 855GM.
Ah, craptastic i855gm. Is this with the HIC poke patch?
> > I've created two quick patches to check a few theories, please test th
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 12:19:14PM +0100, Indan Zupancic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Good news:
>
> On Sun, February 20, 2011 11:55, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> > I've created two quick patches to check a few theories, please test them
> >> > (both patches independently and both together). Patches attached.
>
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 03:20:15AM +0100, Indan Zupancic wrote:
> Sorry, I plainly forgot to mention that. I'm on my Thinkpad X40 with gen 2
> hardware, 855GM.
Ah, craptastic i855gm. Is this with the HIC poke patch?
> > I've created two quick patches to check a few theories, please test th
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 03:20:15AM +0100, Indan Zupancic wrote:
> > I've created two quick patches to check a few theories, please test them
> > (both patches independently and both together). Patches attached.
>
> Tried with both applied, doesn't change anything.
I've just noticed that one
Hi,
Good news:
On Sun, February 20, 2011 11:55, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> > I've created two quick patches to check a few theories, please test them
>> > (both patches independently and both together). Patches attached.
>>
>> Tried with both applied, doesn't change anything.
>
> I've just noticed t
Hi Daniel,
On Sun, February 20, 2011 10:20, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 03:20:15AM +0100, Indan Zupancic wrote:
>> Sorry, I plainly forgot to mention that. I'm on my Thinkpad X40 with gen 2
>> hardware, 855GM.
>
> Ah, craptastic i855gm. Is this with the HIC poke patch?
Yeah, th
Hi Peter,
On Sun, February 20, 2011 04:51, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Confirm I also have this issue on my X40, but there are other bugs
> that are much more significant so I haven't bothered mentioning this.
What issues? If it's backlight related, try my patch at:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/16/447
O
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Please provide the usual details about your system (especially what gpu
> this is on). Also, screenshots of what typical corruptions look like can
> help a lot in tracking down such things.
Confirm I also have this issue on my X40, but there are other bugs
that are much more
Huh, no idea why it didn't go to Daniel the first time, Squirrelmail never
did that before.
On Sun, February 20, 2011 03:20, Indan Zupancic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, February 19, 2011 19:25, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> Hi Indan,
>>
>> Please provide the usual details about your system (especially what
Hi,
On Sat, February 19, 2011 19:25, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi Indan,
>
> Please provide the usual details about your system (especially what gpu
> this is on). Also, screenshots of what typical corruptions look like can
> help a lot in tracking down such things.
Sorry, I plainly forgot to mentio
Hi Peter,
On Sun, February 20, 2011 04:51, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Confirm I also have this issue on my X40, but there are other bugs
> that are much more significant so I haven't bothered mentioning this.
What issues? If it's backlight related, try my patch at:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/16/447
O
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Please provide the usual details about your system (especially what gpu
> this is on). Also, screenshots of what typical corruptions look like can
> help a lot in tracking down such things.
Confirm I also have this issue on my X40, but there are other bugs
that are much more
Hi Indan,
Please provide the usual details about your system (especially what gpu
this is on). Also, screenshots of what typical corruptions look like can
help a lot in tracking down such things.
I've created two quick patches to check a few theories, please test them
(both patches independently
Huh, no idea why it didn't go to Daniel the first time, Squirrelmail never
did that before.
On Sun, February 20, 2011 03:20, Indan Zupancic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, February 19, 2011 19:25, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> Hi Indan,
>>
>> Please provide the usual details about your system (especially what
Hi,
On Sat, February 19, 2011 19:25, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi Indan,
>
> Please provide the usual details about your system (especially what gpu
> this is on). Also, screenshots of what typical corruptions look like can
> help a lot in tracking down such things.
Sorry, I plainly forgot to mentio
Hi Indan,
Please provide the usual details about your system (especially what gpu
this is on). Also, screenshots of what typical corruptions look like can
help a lot in tracking down such things.
I've created two quick patches to check a few theories, please test them
(both patches independently
Hello,
Since 2.6.38-rc I get screen corruption (mostly horizontal grabage stripes on
the right side of the screen). After a long time bisecting the offending commit
ends up being:
commit a00b10c360b35d6431a94cbf130a4e162870d661
Author: Chris Wilson
Date: Fri Sep 24 21:15:47 2010 +0100
drm
Hello,
Since 2.6.38-rc I get screen corruption (mostly horizontal grabage stripes on
the right side of the screen). After a long time bisecting the offending commit
ends up being:
commit a00b10c360b35d6431a94cbf130a4e162870d661
Author: Chris Wilson
Date: Fri Sep 24 21:15:47 2010 +0100
drm
34 matches
Mail list logo
