On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 18:14 +0100, Steven J Newbury wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 15:43 +0100, Steven J Newbury wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 20:50 +0800, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Jin, Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Kristian H?gsber
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13391
--- Comment #8 from Ben Gamari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-04-04 16:22:50 PST ---
Hey, sorry about the delayed response. I'm on a i965 now so I may or may not be
able to reproduce the problem. Regardless, I'm just struggling to even get
compiz to
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13409
--- Comment #7 from Ben Gamari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-04-04 16:19:01 PST ---
Sorry about the belated response. It used to happen when compiz segfaulted. I'm
now on an i965 so I may or may not be able to reproduce. Regardless, I'm
struggling
On Friday, April 04, 2008 11:14 am Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Dave Airlie wrote:
> > I'm just wondering if rather than specify all the CACHED and MAPPABLE and
> > SHAREABLE flags we make the BO interface in terms of CPU and GPU
> > operations..
> >
> > So we define
> > CPU_READ - cpu needs to read
Dave Airlie wrote:
> I'm just wondering if rather than specify all the CACHED and MAPPABLE and
> SHAREABLE flags we make the BO interface in terms of CPU and GPU
> operations..
>
> So we define
> CPU_READ - cpu needs to read from this buffer
> CPU_WRITE - cpu need to write to the buffer
> CPU_PO
