On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 07:22:40PM +0200, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> That's true. It seems that checkpatch script is getting a false
> positive. Just trying to do checkpatch happy.
Also the old code was better than new code so leave it alone.
regards,
dan carpenter
_
On Thu, 2016-09-15 at 19:22 +0200, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> That's true. It seems that checkpatch script is getting a false
> positive. Just trying to do checkpatch happy. Sorry for inconvenience.
Keeping the style consistent instead of taking the simplest path
to quiet the checkpatch messages
That's true. It seems that checkpatch script is getting a false
positive. Just trying to do checkpatch happy. Sorry for inconvenience.
I'll be careful with Changelog stuff from now. Thanks for advice.
Cheers,
Sergio Paracuellos
El 2016年09月15日 a las 16:51, Greg KH escribió:
On Thu, Sep
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 04:29:54PM +0200, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Sergio Paracuellos
> ---
> drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_card.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_card.c
> b/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_c