On 10.2.2012, at 16.55, David L Wetzell wrote:
>> But I'd argue that to make our two-party system work better, we need to
>> provide a constructive role for 3rd parties in it. This wd be accomplished
>> by the use of 3-seat LR Hare in state reps elections. If the Hare quota is
>> used in the
Hi Kristofer,
I am very interested in PR multiwinner methods, especially those that
use ER-Bucklin.
However, I have a hard time following your logic.
Would it be possible to work out a relatively simple example using a 3
winner election, a Droop-like quota of 25% (just to make things easy),
and
On 02/10/2012 11:02 PM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:
We can add a candidate C_k to PC if there exists a subset (coalition)
that supports at least k+1 candidates, where k is the cardinality of the
intersection of PC and that coalition, and that coalition also contains
C_k.
Oops, seems I reused
Earlier I mentioned that I had found a way of making my Bucklin
multiwinner method more managable - more sequential. I did not, however,
say exactly how I had done that.
So why not do that here?
Consider my previous version of the Bucklin multiwinner method (for
which I still haven't found a
Jameson:
I'd said:
> Say my sincere ratings are:
>
> x: 100
> y: 90
>
> (other candidates considerably lower)
>
> Your sincere ratings are:
>
> y: 100
> x: 90
>
> (other candidates considerably lower)
>
> x and y are similar, but different enough to be supported by
> different factions.
>
> This
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:10 PM, <
election-methods-requ...@lists.electorama.com> wrote:
> Send Election-Methods mailing list submissions to
>election-methods@lists.electorama.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
> http://lists.electorama.com/listinfo.cgi/elec
