Re: [O] new link parameters and link abbreviations

Great! I'd think that shall do. Thank you for this fast fix! On 2016-08-23 Tue 07:44, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > John Kitchin writes: > >> I can confirm this happens. I think it happens because the abbreviation >> is not listed in org-plain-link-re, so when

Re: [O] new link parameters and link abbreviations

Thank you for this confirmation of the abbreviation issue. > I would suggest just defining short links ;) Well, there are limits to this approach e.g. file+mnl {mnl = myNewLink}. Furthermore, link definitions then tend to become pretty cryptic :-(. Optimally, the 'org-link-abbrev-alist' could

Re: [O] abbreviations of link-type "file"

Thank your for taking up this quick posting. While writing up the attached 'Exemple Complet Minimal', the parsing turned out to work well. Now only the :help-echo, not being triggered by an abbreviated link, remains still an issue as demonstrated by the ECM below. I shall consider your

Re: [O] [bug] inserting footnotes via org-footnote-action command

On 2016-02-28 Sun 02:23, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Martin Carlé <m...@aiguphonie.com> writes: > >> Well, I wrapped the exporter mechanism into some advice functions that >> allow for many different exports from a single file in such a manner that >>

Re: [O] [bug] inserting footnotes via org-footnote-action command

by tags. This is why, I need to tag the org-footnote-section as well. Best regards, mc On 2016-02-27 Sat 10:16, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Martin Carlé <m...@aiguphonie.com> writes: > >> Keeping the tags is actually crucial to my practice, since I run some >&g

Re: [O] [bug] inserting footnotes via org-footnote-action command

to check for tags assigned to the org-footnote-section and then re-create them as well? Including this feature would be tremendously helpful and shouldn't do harm to anybody else. Best, mc On 2016-02-26 Fri 23:53, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Martin Carlé <m...@aiguphonie

[O] [bug] inserting footnotes via org-footnote-action command

Hello, the outline heading containing footnote definitions (as specified by org-footnote-section) does not accept tags. E.g. if you add a tag to this headline and then try to insert a footnote via the org-footnote-action command, always a new headline without the tag is created and the former

Re: [O] Org Babel resolution of `:var` value reference inconsistent

On 2015-11-04 Wed 14:14, Andreas Leha wrote: > ,--- > | > I'd say it is a bug if the results from evaluation differ between > | > manual evaluation and during export. > | > > | > And even if it is not explicitely

[O] [BUG] COMMENT-ed sections are tangled, if preceded by an org-todo keyword

Hello, sections or subtrees commented with org-comment-string in the headline should not be tangled. This works fine. However, if a tag defined in org-todo-keywords (other than TODO or DONE) precedes the comment (as the official syntax has it), commenting is no longer respected such that

Re: [O] [BUG] COMMENT-ed sections are tangled, if preceded by an org-todo keyword

; "DONEs") | )) `------- Maybe that's the reason why it couldn't be reproduced. Or do I m

Re: [O] Tangling from indirect buffer

Indirect buffers are of immense help but I had the same issue. Can confirm that the hack referring to spec instead to the buffer-file-name and getting the buffer-base-buffer respectively, does the trick. Great! On 2015-09-04 Fri 17:49, Kyle Meyer wrote: > Rainer M Krug

[O] org-comment-string fontification stopped working in sublevel headlines

Hello, guess the commit c27c101f (08/16/2015 04:14 PM) with the title org.el: Fix `org-comment-string' fontification has chosen a bit too harsh 'fixation' method: Since then, the 'org-special-keyword' face for 'COMMENT' is not applied to heading of lower levels any more but only to the top

Re: [O] [bug] fuzzy link not matching commented headlines

relevant to author during writing phase. (Notes in drawers are fine, but cannot be linked up, as far as I know.) All best, mc On 2015-03-26 Thu 22:09, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: Hello, Martin Carlé m...@aiguphonie.com writes: Guess it's a bug that fuzzy links won't match a commented headline

[O] [bug] fuzzy link not matching commented headlines

Guess it's a bug that fuzzy links won't match a commented headline whereas the other internal link types (custom_id and org ID) do. Or is there a special purpose for this specific type of link regarding comments? Just check the following example:

[O] org-special-keyword face not showing in sublevels anymore since commit 69700e1

It appears that by commit 69700e1 [22.04.2014 13:09] a little bug slipped into the codebase, sinc the org-special-keyword face is only shown at the top level in the correct face, but then gets simply overwritten by the respective sublevel face. I guess, this is not intented and would be nice to

Re: [O] [bug] [new exporter] [markdown] spoiled URL containing '=' if using http/s org-links

Dear Bastien, yes, I just checked it against the master branch, and how great, the URL of org-links stays intact now!!! So, that's solved. Yet, there is another minor issue, as any underscore char '_' that is contained in the link description (not the URL part) of an org-link is swallow up and