Dan Davison writes:
> Sebastian Rose writes:
>
>> Carsten Dominik writes:
> org-install would figure out where org.el is, add to .emacs and query
> for compilation. This wouod make things independent from make and
> other tools.
Yes I wondered about making something like t
Sebastian Rose writes:
> Carsten Dominik writes:
org-install would figure out where org.el is, add to .emacs and query
for compilation. This wouod make things independent from make and
other tools.
>>>
>>> Yes I wondered about making something like that yesterday (would it make
>
Carsten Dominik writes:
>>> org-install would figure out where org.el is, add to .emacs and query
>>> for compilation. This wouod make things independent from make and
>>> other tools.
>>
>> Yes I wondered about making something like that yesterday (would it make
>> sense to have emacs do everyth
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Sep 27, 2010, at 11:00 AM, Dan Davison wrote:
>
>> Carsten Dominik writes:
>>
>>> On Sep 26, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
>>>
I think that the documentation concerning installation should be
made
more user-friendly.
[...]
I suggest w
On Sep 27, 2010, at 11:00 AM, Dan Davison wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
On Sep 26, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
I think that the documentation concerning installation should be
made
more user-friendly. My impression is that the Org manual makes all
this
sound much harder than it
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Sep 26, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
>
>> I think that the documentation concerning installation should be made
>> more user-friendly. My impression is that the Org manual makes all
>> this
>> sound much harder than it needs to be, and I suspect that this is a
Rémi Vanicat writes:
> Richard Riley writes:
>
>> You have no idea how pleased I am to hear you say that ... I sometimes
>> wondered if I should go back to notepad ;) When asking the #emacs irc it
>> seemed I was the only one in the world that constantly had issues. Of
>> course mentioning "Debi
Richard Riley writes:
> You have no idea how pleased I am to hear you say that ... I sometimes
> wondered if I should go back to notepad ;) When asking the #emacs irc it
> seemed I was the only one in the world that constantly had issues. Of
> course mentioning "Debian" immediately saw me get the
On Monday 27 September 2010 02:52 am, Dan Davison wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Richard Riley writes:
> > Dan Davison writes:
> >> I think that the documentation concerning installation should be made
> >> more user-friendly. My impression is that the Org manual makes all this
> >> sound much harder t
Dan Davison writes:
> OK, so we're agreed. But your points below don't seem to describe a less
> technical route. Could you describe the less technical version of the
> instructions for the method that you are advocating?
Installing is something technical and I'm a tech-head, so you're asking
som
Achim Gratz writes:
> Dan Davison writes:
>
>> I think that the documentation concerning installation should be made
>> more user-friendly. My impression is that the Org manual makes all this
>> sound much harder than it needs to be, and I suspect that this is an
>> entry-barrier for new Org use
Dan Davison writes:
> I think that the documentation concerning installation should be made
> more user-friendly. My impression is that the Org manual makes all this
> sound much harder than it needs to be, and I suspect that this is an
> entry-barrier for new Org users. For example, the first th
Dan Davison writes:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Richard Riley writes:
>
>> Info files are the issue. The addition to the infopath of the new info
>> files is frequently an issue too. I say that because emacs info is my
>> nemesis : I have never *properly* understood the way dir files work and
>> frequentl
On Sep 26, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
Hi Richard,
Richard Riley writes:
Dan Davison writes:
I think that the documentation concerning installation should be
made
more user-friendly. My impression is that the Org manual makes all
this
sound much harder than it needs to be, a
Hi Richard,
Richard Riley writes:
> Dan Davison writes:
>
>> I think that the documentation concerning installation should be made
>> more user-friendly. My impression is that the Org manual makes all this
>> sound much harder than it needs to be, and I suspect that this is an
>> entry-barrier
Dan Davison writes:
> I think that the documentation concerning installation should be made
> more user-friendly. My impression is that the Org manual makes all this
> sound much harder than it needs to be, and I suspect that this is an
> entry-barrier for new Org users. For example, the first th
16 matches
Mail list logo
