[O] bug#21818: 24.5; org-set-tags-to indentation problems when called programmatically

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> After a quick glance, I think you are right: invisible characters are >> not treated the same way in both cases. I'll investigate deeper soon. > > Fixed in d5767ad. Closing this bug report,

Re: [O] bug#21818: 24.5; org-set-tags-to indentation problems when called programmatically

Emanuel Evans writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> I don't consider it to be a bug. >> >> `org-element-interpret-data' produces a string, which is expected to be >> syntactically correct, but doesn't guarantee aesthetics. In particular, >>

Re: [O] bug#21818: 24.5; org-set-tags-to indentation problems when called programmatically

Hello, Emanuel Evans writes: > Hi! It looks like it's fixed for `org-insert-link', but I ran across a > similar bug with `org-element-interpret-data' that seems to be not > entirely fixed: > > (defun good-indent () > (interactive) > (insert

Re: [O] bug#21818: 24.5; org-set-tags-to indentation problems when called programmatically

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > I don't consider it to be a bug. > > `org-element-interpret-data' produces a string, which is expected to be > syntactically correct, but doesn't guarantee aesthetics. In particular, > `org-element-headline-interpreter' tries to align tags as

[O] bug#21818: 24.5; org-set-tags-to indentation problems when called programmatically

Hello, Emanuel Evans writes: > Great, is there anything else I should do from my end to make sure it > gets to the org mailing list? (I looked for the original post there and > didn't see it.) You report reached the Org mailing list. Thank you. After a quick glance, I

[O] bug#21818: 24.5; org-set-tags-to indentation problems when called programmatically

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > After a quick glance, I think you are right: invisible characters are > not treated the same way in both cases. I'll investigate deeper soon. Fixed in d5767ad.

Re: [O] bug#21818: 24.5; org-set-tags-to indentation problems when called programmatically

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Fixed in d5767ad. Awesome, thanks for looking at this!

[O] bug#21818: 24.5; org-set-tags-to indentation problems when called programmatically

Glenn Morris writes: > Nope, just a mailing list AFAIK. Assigning something to the debbugs > org-mode package (which I already did for this report) sends stuff there. Great, is there anything else I should do from my end to make sure it gets to the org mailing list? (I looked for

[O] bug#21818: 24.5; org-set-tags-to indentation problems when called programmatically

Eli Zaretskii writes: > Org mode has its own bug tracker, AFAIR. OK, I'll submit there. Thanks! > P.S. Your email bounces, so sending me a private email is not very > wise... Oops, sorry about that and thanks for the heads up.

[O] bug#21818: 24.5; org-set-tags-to indentation problems when called programmatically

Apologies if this is a dupe; I think some of my posts aren't getting through to the list (I just subscribed, so hopefully that will help). Glenn Morris writes: > Nope, just a mailing list AFAIK. Assigning something to the debbugs > org-mode package (which I already did for this

[O] bug#21818: 24.5; org-set-tags-to indentation problems when called programmatically

Apologies if this is a dupe; I think some of my posts aren't getting through to the list (I just subscribed, so hopefully that will help). Glenn Morris writes: > Nope, just a mailing list AFAIK. Assigning something to the debbugs > org-mode package (which I already did for this

[O] bug#21818: 24.5; org-set-tags-to indentation problems when called programmatically

Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Org mode has its own bug tracker, AFAIR. Nope, just a mailing list AFAIK. Assigning something to the debbugs org-mode package (which I already did for this report) sends stuff there.

[O] bug#21818: 24.5; org-set-tags-to indentation problems when called programmatically

> From: Emanuel Evans > Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 10:14:33 -0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Are you sure this isn't a problem with Org mode? If not, can you tell > > why you think so? > > Oh, I think it could definitely be a problem with Org mode, I